If you think this proves something, then ...o wait, never mind.
IOWA STATE TO BIG TEN?!? Dave Wannstedt thinks so.
- Thread starter cyclone4L
- Start date
If you think this proves something, then ...o wait, never mind.
Won’t hurt recruiting in state. The hawkeyes have been shown as being very pathetic coaches and people so we are way ahead there.
All-you-can-eat fire-roasted meat. It's terrific. You don't have to eat for about a week afterwards.
It's rough, but not as bad as having a racist coaching staff and an AD who has cost your university MILLIONS in lawsuits for gender discrimination. Now that's rough.
I understand the grant of rights. I wouldn't take FSU if I were the SEC. Clemson and USC. You are only dealing with one school's grant of rights. Clemson is obviously highly unlikely, but they could do the same thing with OU and Texas and Clemson can say "we aren't planning on renewing in 2035". Let's say 30 mill a year for the 15 years...If Clemson can make 80 mill a year in the SEC (-30 mil for the ACC GoR) results in a net gain of 50 mil. I wouldn't put it past the SEC to do something like that because of the whole SEC small weiner energy thing they have going on.
"the overwhelming consensus among industry sources is that the conference will stand on 12.
But the Hotline endeavors to examine all major issues from every possible angle.
To that end, we imagined an alternate universe in which the Pac-14 was deemed inevitable."
Ok. One "journalist" imagined an alternate universe and decided he wanted Houston as his first choice.
This means " A lot of Pac 12 journalists actually said Houston would be their #1 target " in your mind?
Is that right? His analysis is not particularly impressive, either.
Proof that we reached the point of "throwing anything at the wall to see what sticks" some time ago...
Like I said in my original posts, it’s all speculation. There are a couple of others too but I’m not digging them up because irrelevant click bate like most realignment stuff. We will see what the Big 12 does. My vote is stay at 10 until the 2 traitors leave and then hopefully find a better landing spot.
That’s right up there with the idea that Rutgers would give the Big Ten the NYC market, and at least the Big Ten had a strategy with milking subscription fees for BTN.
No school in the AAC or MWC is going to join Big12/8 without the stability of GOR. An easier solution for Big12/8 would be to go after current independent programs like BYU, UConn or Army. Have them join Big12 for football only if they prefer to stay independent or Big East/MWC in other sports.
At some point in the next 1-2 years, the Big12/8 is going to know whether Big10, Pac12 or SEC invites are forthcoming. At that point, the Big12 can approach AAC or MWC schools and I'm sure everyone in the reformulated Big12 would agree to a GOR (if they prove to be valid after UT/OU testing) for whatever the media contract length.
The key business point that everybody is forgetting: as long as the college playoff stays at 4 teams, the expansion is checkmated, especially for the SEC.
Staying at four teams will slow everything down. Do you think OU and UT want to go to the SEC when there's only four teams in the college football playoff?
