He’s called “Tuco” because the meth addict from Breaking Bad was more sane, more stable, and had more brainpower and thus made better logical arguments than Twocoach has ever made in his life.
Officiating travesty in Lawrence
- Thread starter MartyFine
- Start date
He’s called “Tuco” because the meth addict from Breaking Bad was more sane, more stable, and had more brainpower and thus made better logical arguments than Twocoach has ever made in his life.
Either way, dude's a giant douche who spends all his time trolling an ISU website and acting like he isn't. Just like Surly.
But then this more clear shot looks like there is space. Again, probably OK with it going either way but of course, it is going to be called to KU favor.
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
If this was the only angle they had I don’t know how you argue with their decision. It’s all I remember seeing in TV when they were replaying and couldn’t objectively say it was a really bad call. But that other angle clearly suggests otherwise
Ask him if he thought it affected the outcome of the game. You’ll get what you were expecting.
Yeah I forgot about that one when there were 2 points incorrectly given to KU and 2 taken from ISU that were beyond any argument.
That call should just stay as it is. There was some debate if it was originally called a 3 or not. The other angles show the same too close to know either way.
two weeks ago he was arguing ISU players foul elbows with their chin and now he’s arguing the most inadvertent elbow to chin fouls are automatic flagrant.
That sums it up.
Where did this shot come from? They only showed the overhead one on ESPN, which definitely looks like his toe is on the line. Honestly, I'm not too upset about the 2/3. If we're down to the point where a portion of his shoe is over the line but curves up so it is not actually making contact with the ground, then I am not going to sweat it. I would think technically that would mean a 3, but I don't know if they had access to this type of view. The one from above looks definitive that his toe is on the line.
I'd actually be thrilled if they still **** up these actual close calls and always give KU the benefit of the doubt if they could not blow completely obvious ones like the goaltend.
Not sure if it should make anyone feel better, but I watched a bit of the Duke/Wake Game, and the amount of contact and travelling Duke could commit while Wake was called extremely tight makes me wonder how Duke could ever possibly lose a game. I watched about 8 minutes and it was absolutely brutal.
KU gets every close call, a lot of calls that don't get made, and at times blatantly change the rules of the game. That Homan free throw debacle still pisses me off.
I kind of want to know some of the dark secrets behind CF (history, etc.) but then again maybe I don't. Probably better off this way. I've been a member since '07 but due to rural internet difficulties, never started posting regularly in game threads until maybe 2 -3 years ago (internet a little to a lot better now than back then).
Legit question. I would think that espn might like more cameras, not less, with their remote broadcasts. Either way the number and positions of the cameras should be relatively equal during conference games in the future.
As far as picture quality (and speed) for the remote guys... I'm betting that has to be top tier. But it is espn so.
One of the major reasons for having announcers at televised games - so viewers can "see" and "hear" all of the action, even what occurs away from what the currently active camera is showing - goes out the window when we have announcers who are simply looking at camera feeds.
I asked in another thread but no one answered me. What did twins get banned for?Live lookin at Twins without his CF:
Just kidding, Twins, love ya!
