You're asking a bunch of rhetorical questions that serve nothing but to create meaningless arguments. I'm sure K-State has outdrawn Missouri over the years. K-State's all-time team (Boozer, Beasley, Blackman, Kruger, Richmond, coached by Tex Winter) would demolish Missouri's. K-State's facilities are first-class. Money has never been an issue. Basketball success is about coaching with top-tier Jimmys and Joes, not whether you're located in Ames, Lubbock, or Waco.
That could be a factor. He hired a winning football coach and an experienced baseball skipper. Both with long histories as head coaches. Yes, history suggests Tang would not be Taylor's first choice.
You're missing the point. As I mentioned, Mizzou opening up takes potential candidates away from KSU. It's simply a better job.
Due to conference affiliation, I'd take Maryland if given a choice, but it's close. UConn is one of those homeless schools that's totally dependent on hoops' success, while Maryland gets loads of dough from their B10 football program. Plus, Maryland has a strong basketball tradition as well.
No, I'm not missing your point. I disagree with it. There's nothing in the numbers to suggest that's anything but internet baiting on your part. Quite the opposite is true. At best, Missouri is an equal opportunity.
Homeless school? Uconn is in the Big East, they crush almost, not every, but almost every school in the Country's accolades the last 20 years.
If you're just looking at past success yes. But other numbers will show you Missouri has more resources, fans, etc. For whatever reason you choose to ignore that, because your purple blinders are on, as usual.
I ignore false narrative by internet bullies, yes. Rather, I tend to default to facts and records.
Internet bullies. LOL.
Missouri's Martin $3.0 million
With money being a wash, I'll go with the school who's in the best basketball conference-- K-State.
If he wasn't from Texas he'd probably be courted again.
