POLL: How much will you contribute to the collective

Annual Contribution Amount

  • $0

    Votes: 196 50.8%
  • $50

    Votes: 22 5.7%
  • $100

    Votes: 68 17.6%
  • $250

    Votes: 40 10.4%
  • $500

    Votes: 32 8.3%
  • $1,00

    Votes: 10 2.6%
  • $5,000

    Votes: 7 1.8%
  • $10,000

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • $50,000

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • $100,000

    Votes: 9 2.3%

  • Total voters
    386

CycloneSpinning

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2022
1,052
1,350
113
44
There are so many things I would put ahead of this (when it comes to giving money) that I can't envision opting in. Even if I was making so much money that I wished people would stop giving me money, I would likely just give to the general fund. As others have said, I don't mind players getting money for name, image, and likeness, but let it come from a special sandwich at Jethro's or George White using them in a commercial.

Let's also not forget that while some of these kids will have career-ending injuries or won't pan out, most that are going to get serious NIL money are likely going to be millionaires in a year or two. You're essentially talking about scrounging together $.50/day...so you can give money to (soon to be) millionaires.
 
Nov 27, 2021
50
74
18
I'll donate some (couple hundred) but I can see both points of view with all of this.

I'd be much more willing to have my kids take a photo with athletes and pay them.
Responding to the 2nd line, I’d imagine that part of the collective will be setting up meet and greets or something similar. It’s NIL, the athlete still needs to actually do something in order to be paid, not just be the student athlete.
 

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,370
7,190
113
This whole thing is so dumb, and it is continuing because so many people believe these athletes have been taken advantage of. Almost every high school athlete in this country dreams of a D1 scholarship, and they work their butts off for the slim chance of getting there. I don't think thousands if not millions of people are busting their ass for years of their lives on the hopes of being exploited. This system has offered plenty back to the athletes as is.

Now this NIL nonsense is going to kill the gravy train, or at least shrink the numbers players at the table. Many will lose out so the rich can get richer.
 
Last edited:

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,157
7,758
113
Dubuque
Will the dollars donated to the collective be tax deductible?
I would assume so.

Not sure that is a good assumption. Have you seen anywhere that contributions to collectives will be tax deductible?

I am no tax to expert, but it would seem if athletes are being compensated for NIL, that is payment for services performed. If collectives have found a loophole, I would think the IRS would close pretty quickly.
 

Tailg8er

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2011
7,891
4,743
113
38
Johnston
Responding to the 2nd line, I’d imagine that part of the collective will be setting up meet and greets or something similar. It’s NIL, the athlete still needs to actually do something in order to be paid, not just be the student athlete.
Yeah, I don't think that's true, though. That's what most of us envisioned NIL to be, but sounds like many players will just get paid to go to a certain school (regardless of how good they perform or if they even stick around).
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: isufbcurt and JP4CY

PickSix

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2013
866
1,370
93
I won’t be donating. I’m all for players getting money, but not like this. If recruiting turns purely into a bidding war rather than choosing schools based on merit, then I’m out. I don’t care to contribute to such a system.

The day is near when I will likely be exclusively following lower level college football, where there’s less money and more kids playing for the love of the game.
 

CycloneErik

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2008
108,158
53,408
113
Jamerica
rememberingdoria.wordpress.com
Zero dollars and zero cents. This isn’t NIL, this is just paying players, which is fine I just don’t think fans should shoulder that burden anymore than they already do.

Just to go further with it: We know that ISU isn't going to bring in enough to be competitive. It's just throwing good money after bad thinking this will keep us in some sort of competitive position.
 

Mr.G.Spot

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 22, 2020
5,770
154
113
60
Just to go further with it: We know that ISU isn't going to bring in enough to be competitive. It's just throwing good money after bad thinking this will keep us in some sort of competitive position.
Maybe that is the best response yet for those on here that are seeking justification for their attitude. Wow.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: aauummm and Cyclad

Cyclones01

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 23, 2008
2,348
1,200
113
Urbandale
After years of talking about how athletes deserve some compensation for all the money they bring in for their schools, it's insane to me that we've arrived at a place where they can receive money from literally anyone EXCEPT the very entity they help bring money in for. The only system that would make any sense to me is for the players to start receiving a percentage of the money that's already coming in. Not relying on the fans to try and create an entirely separate revenue stream, aside from the donations were already making.
 
Last edited:

isuno1fan

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
23,300
4,699
113
Clive, Iowa
This. I expected NIL to be like getting money for doing a camp, autograph signings or collaborations with local businesses. I didn't expect things like collectives boosters basically buying players.
Then you were dumb when the rest of us were trying to explain it to you, but yet the mantra continued it's the right thing to do!
 

pourcyne

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2011
9,930
13,014
113
As much as I give to any other professional or semi-pro sports team: Zippo (and I don't mean the lighter).