Seriously?! Texas too?!The stupid part of that (okay you Bowlsby folks explain this one) is that all 10 teams get a cut of the ESPN + tier 3 package for the 8 teams. That is crap.
Seriously?! Texas too?!The stupid part of that (okay you Bowlsby folks explain this one) is that all 10 teams get a cut of the ESPN + tier 3 package for the 8 teams. That is crap.
Oof. Stew just got murdered here.
I dont think that is correct. The tier 3 ESPN+ deal did not include TX and OU, their deal was separate and paid separate. The deal gave the other 8, I believe $4M each.The stupid part of that (okay you Bowlsby folks explain this one) is that all 10 teams get a cut of the ESPN + tier 3 package for the 8 teams. That is crap.
Except the SEC is not going to Add USF just to add someone. It is not like they dont already have a Florida school. That would be like adding Georgia Southern, just because they cant get Georgia Tech. Or Rice because you cant get Texas Tech.How desperate will Miami and FSU be to get to BIG ASAP? They can’t risk waiting and no longer being valuable enough
A hypothetical- say the ACC GOR is actually prohibitive of schools leaving early. Which has more value, USF if in SEC next 14 years or FSU in ACC?
My guess is USF with the SEC brand and $800 million more than FSU surpasses FSU. Better location for recruiting. They could hire better staff.
Except the SEC is not going to Add USF just to add someone. It is not like they dont already have a Florida school. That would be like adding Georgia Southern, just because they cant get Georgia Tech. Or Rice because you cant get Texas Tech.
Oof. Stew just got murdered here.
Explain how Stew got murdered in this...? I mean I would love for it to be, I'm just not connecting the dots yet.
Ok, I follow, but by my interpretation of that tweet and the article, Warren did not name those schools, "sources" did, that could be anyone.Stew’s been on tilt about how the Big 12 is weaker than the PAC-12 and yadda yadda yadda. This one comment where Warren named names just totally blew that up. There is no way that schools like CU, AZ, UT, ASU can sit around and just wait knowing that the B10 has OU, Wash, and Stanford in their radar.
He was working on the (flawed) premise that the P10 was stable even without the LA schools, and trying to make the B12 out as the “unstable”, ready to be poached conference. There was zero stability in the PAC after the LA schools announced (just like there was no stability in the B12 when Out announced, until the adds).
With this naming of names by the B10 it’s absolutely, 100% over for stew’s ****** hot takes. He done, i predict he will be on to some other crackhead ideas now and will sign off on this little episode with a “I said “probably” and “if” the whole time”. Dude just owned by Kevin the CoVID season Warren lol.
Agree.Stew’s been on tilt about how the Big 12 is weaker than the PAC-12 and yadda yadda yadda. This one comment where Warren named names just totally blew that up. There is no way that schools like CU, AZ, UT, ASU can sit around and just wait knowing that the B10 has OU, Wash, and Stanford in their radar.
He was working on the (flawed) premise that the P10 was stable even without the LA schools, and trying to make the B12 out as the “unstable”, ready to be poached conference. There was zero stability in the PAC after the LA schools announced (just like there was no stability in the B12 when Out announced, until the adds).
With this naming of names by the B10 it’s absolutely, 100% over for stew’s ****** hot takes. He done, i predict he will be on to some other crackhead ideas now and will sign off on this little episode with a “I said “probably” and “if” the whole time”. Dude just owned by Kevin the CoVID season Warren lol.
McMurphy isn’t MHver.Ok, I follow, but by my interpretation of that tweet and the article, Warren did not name those schools, "sources" did, that could be anyone.
I dont know I have read anywhere that the SEC "wants" a 2nd Florida team. I have read that they are interested in FSU. No one says that is because they are the Florida team in the ACC. It is because of the overall value of the program. I have also heard some speculation of Miami to the SEC, but that is purely speculation. But all is about the program value, not specifically about being a "second" Florida team.Well, USF and GSU are not that similar and the SEC wants a second FL team, preferably closer to population than Tallahassee. If not 3rd. Looks like BIG does too
But it’s a hypothetical. Care to answer? Which has more value after 14 years?
The point was, FSU and Miami snd the valuable ACC schools have huge motivation to get out ASAP or risk brand decay
B10 needs schools close to USC and UCLA so that makes Cal and Stanford more valuable in the B10 than they are in the P12.Agree.
But these jackssses just see the fact the big 10 will eventually come back for more PAC as a sign they’re stronger. Both ignoring that leftover realignment strength doesn’t favor conferences with looming departures and the fact two of those are more about the BIG wanting than it is value. The big 10 can afford to spend on nostalgia and bffs, the 3rd super conference can not
I think you are close on most of this. I think on most of these one of each could be flipped or not.my prediction if McMurphy is right:
B1G adds Oregon, Washington, Cal, Stanford
Big 12 adds Arizona, ASU, Utah, Colorado
Mtn West adds Oregon State, Wazzu.
When the ACC GOR ends (or close enough):
B1G adds Miami, Florida State, Notre Dame, Georgia Tech (not that confident about the last pick)
SEC adds Virginia, UNC, Clemson, Louisville
Big 12 adds Pitt, NC State, Virginia Tech, Syracuse
Big East adds Duke (independent football)
American adds Boston College, Wake Forest
Just to be 100% clear, warren mentioned future expansion is possible but didn’t name names. “Sources” named the schools which I have never heard Florida state mentioned once beforeStew’s been on tilt about how the Big 12 is weaker than the PAC-12 and yadda yadda yadda. This one comment where Warren named names just totally blew that up. There is no way that schools like CU, AZ, UT, ASU can sit around and just wait knowing that the B10 has OU, Wash, and Stanford in their radar.
He was working on the (flawed) premise that the P10 was stable even without the LA schools, and trying to make the B12 out as the “unstable”, ready to be poached conference. There was zero stability in the PAC after the LA schools announced (just like there was no stability in the B12 when Out announced, until the adds).
With this naming of names by the B10 it’s absolutely, 100% over for stew’s ****** hot takes. He done, i predict he will be on to some other crackhead ideas now and will sign off on this little episode with a “I said “probably” and “if” the whole time”. Dude just got owned by Kevin the CoVID season Warren lol.
And people wonder why I talk **** about the athletic. It’s pure elitist garbage when it come to NCAA coverage.
It solves a lot of things for the Big 10 to take Cal and Stan. Gives travel partners for USCLA, bridges the west coast from USCLA to ORWA. Appeases California govt, and BoR. Gives more content for Pacific, Just like the mountain schools gives more mountain content for the B12.B10 needs schools close to USC and UCLA so that makes Cal and Stanford more valuable in the B10 than they are in the P12.
Just to be 100% clear, warren mentioned future expansion is possible but didn’t name names. “Sources” named the schools which I have never heard Florida state mentioned once before
He did say the University didn't need to be AAU so I am assuming he was talking about Iowa State as a future member.Just to be 100% clear, warren mentioned future expansion is possible but didn’t name names. “Sources” named the schools which I have never heard Florida state mentioned once before
Not shocked but the fact that North Carolina isn’t mentioned but Miami and FSU were is very odd for whoever this source isNot shocked. Big football brand in the heart of SEC country.