I wouldn’t worry too much about Padilla. If he was a better option, I think they would be playing him.I agree. I honestly think Padilla comes in early or may even start. Clones should be game planning for both and I’m sure they are.
I wouldn’t worry too much about Padilla. If he was a better option, I think they would be playing him.I agree. I honestly think Padilla comes in early or may even start. Clones should be game planning for both and I’m sure they are.
I agree.I wouldn’t worry too much about Padilla. If he was a better option, I think they would be playing him.
You haven't met our coach. Sat a Heisman runner-up in favor of Kyle McCann. Sat Stanzi in favor of Christensen. Sat Beathard in favor of Rudock. Not saying Padilla is lights out or even all that much better, but KF has frequently whiffed badly on assessing the talent in our QB room.I wouldn’t worry too much about Padilla. If he was a better option, I think they would be playing him.
That's just fuel for the first 1/4 mile!What time does a person need to show up to find a spot in the free parking lots? The 1-2 mile walk doesn’t bother me, we did that in Norman last year.
Also, are open containers and small gas’s grills allowed in finkbine or Hancher? Would like to cook a couple brats/burgers for the crew while have a beer or two.
OKIn general I think the big concern for Iowa is #1 can the offense score any points at all and #2 will the defense get worn down if they get no rest and you keep putting them in bad situations over and over.
I guess I hadn’t thought about this too much but when you put it that way, yikes. Add that to him doubling down on Brian’s role after a poor season from the offense by giving him the QB coach title along with OC and his general stubbornness to not change much, I get why Iowa fans are so damn frustrated.You haven't met our coach. Sat a Heisman runner-up in favor of Kyle McCann. Sat Stanzi in favor of Christensen. Sat Beathard in favor of Rudock. Not saying Padilla is lights out or even all that much better, but KF has frequently whiffed badly on assessing the talent in our QB room.
Seems as if Dejean and Jacobs played a lot at the same time last game, especially on known passing downs. So will be interesting to see who has to step in due to the absence of Jacobs given that Dejean already played a ton when Jacobs was in.Without Jacobs, Iowa is likely to run a lot more 4-2-5 and only play 2 LBs with Cooper Dejean coming in and playing what they call the Cash position which is sort of a hybrid LB/safety role. We’ve used that coverage a bunch in recent years so it’s not new. I am disappointed Jacobs is out because I think he’s one of our better players but we have lots of good DBs so the pass defense isn’t something I’m super worried about.
In general I think the big concern for Iowa is #1 can the offense score any points at all and #2 will the defense get worn down if they get no rest and you keep putting them in bad situations over and over.
I don't think that is necessarily true. Brock has a much better arm than some give him credit for.
Because last year 8 of the 13 teams they played score 20 or more points on them. We scored 17 and our turnovers gave them at least 13 of their 27. If we would have not forced the FG to try to cut it to one score or continually turned it over or shanked punts, we probably have another 13-17 points right there.I’m starting to think ISU will win this game but I don’t see how so many on here think we’ll score 24+ on that defense. I’m hoping for 10-3 or something like that.
1 & 2 I really don't see happening..This game will come down to execution as Iowa's defense and special teams are ELITE.
So for ISU to win we need to:
- Win the turnover battle. Can't give Iowa's offense the short field
- Our special teams have to perform close to Iowa's.
- Limit Iowa's run game. Make them 1 dimensional.
- Put pressure on Iowa's QB.