Scheelhasse oc

stateofmind

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2007
6,635
4,174
113
Ankeny
The thing is here that Nate will be here a maximum of 3 years I would guess. If it works he will get a HC job. If it doesn't we will probably have a new HC. Hopefully Campbell is still our coach as we will have finally won the conference.
 

cyclone1209

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2010
3,860
2,531
113
Denver
Who has he recruited? I honestly don’t know. I know that “the jimmy and joes are more important than the X’s and O’s“ so I hope he’s a great recruiter, game planning, schemes, adjustments, and feeling the flow of a game are important too (among other things). I was hoping for an outside hire, but hope to heaven this is the best hire ever!
- Dominique Orange (maybe the best high school nose we have gotten in 20 years)
- Jaylin Noel (who has to play better to catch up with his hype)
- Carson Willich (very good young LB if you watched his play this year)
- Deshawn Hannika: our best TE this year and it wasn't close
- Jason Essex: highly rated 3 star TE from Kansas City
- Highly rated 3 star DE Ikenna Ezegou from KC (beat out KSU and a number of schools for)

From a recruiting standpoint I get this. He is an ace and you do need to keep an ACE young coach happy. Only a matter of time before Iowa loses Levar Woods for instance.

From a coaching standpoint. I am neutral on this b/c we have yet to see - is Campbell going to give full reigns and say "this is your chance as a P5 OC, I won't meddle, it is your system". Or does he meddle and make this harder for him? We will see.

I know one thing, I hope he has learned from Tom in that: you don't run 3 TE sets when you have subpar tight ends and a subpar fullback (which Rus was), you don't call 3 yard routes when it is 3rd and 7, you have to be creative in the run game department, and you need to play to the team's strengths. Regardless of who got this job, those are 'quick fixes' for me in that you just cut those out of the offense.

Oh - and it's time to get cutthroat on the Offensive Line Nobody who played last year has a starting role for April, everyone has to compete for jobs, new portal OL, get a juco, create competition b/c that absolutely has to get better.
 

FallOf81

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2017
3,016
4,702
113
Would love to sit down with former S and C coordinator and get his perspective. Would probably be a real eye opener.
 

Drew0311

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2019
9,079
13,758
113
51
Norwalk, Iowa
I don't get it. He may be a great coach. However, can't we afford to get a proven guy who has done it before? I mean we are a major program. Go get a guy with a proven offensive scheme. I mean if you think about it, Nate has been learning from Manning. Do we really want the understudy of the guy we just fired?
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,157
7,758
113
Dubuque
Seems like Campbell saying:
  1. The offense was broke in 2022 but doesn't need an overhaul schematically. I think most people realized that having a ball control offense is part of Campbell's coaching DNA so he wasn't going to go all Mike Leach on us.
  2. It was Scheelhaase's time to become an OC. Either at ISU or another school.
  3. It's 16 days until national signing day and prime portal season, so best not to draw out an OC search out and move on to getting an OL, RB and S&C coach hired.
  4. Campbell's going to climb back up the mountain or take the big fall with the guys he knows and trusts.
 

MyNameEhJeff

Well-Known Member
Apr 2, 2021
1,086
1,736
113
21 Jump Street
I love Scheelhasse, and think he's a great coach and recruiter.

I'm nervous about having a first time coordinator in charge of a unit that was already struggling in game planning, execution, and game management.

It's possible Scheelhasse was getting looks from other schools to be OC, and only way Campbell could keep him is by promoting him. If that's the case, I agree with the move.
Have to imagine Golesh reached out to him shortly after becoming a HC
 

ColoradoClone

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2006
1,049
25
48
When we hired Prohm, I feel TJ was a strong candidate and probably who we wanted but didn’t feel we should offer that stretch and instead let someone else give him the experience while we went with someone that had experience. When the experienced candidate didn’t pan out, We we’re fortunate that TJ wanted to come back. So far it’s working out.

This feels like we learned and said “if we really like this guy, let’s be the one one to give him the experience vs hope we can get him back on staff later” . We don’t want to risk possibly losing him for good and regret it.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,370
47,069
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Seems like Campbell saying:
  1. The offense was broke in 2022 but doesn't need an overhaul schematically. I think most people realized that having a ball control offense is part of Campbell's coaching DNA so he wasn't going to go all Mike Leach on us.
  2. It was Scheelhaase's time to become an OC. Either at ISU or another school.
  3. It's 16 days until national signing day and prime portal season, so best not to draw out an OC search out and move on to getting an OL, RB and S&C coach hired.
  4. Campbell's going to climb back up the mountain or take the big fall with the guys he knows and trusts.
Yep. It also seems like none of those 4 should be a surprise.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BACyclone

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,860
24,998
113
I don't get it. He may be a great coach. However, can't we afford to get a proven guy who has done it before? I mean we are a major program. Go get a guy with a proven offensive scheme. I mean if you think about it, Nate has been learning from Manning. Do we really want the understudy of the guy we just fired?

Problem is that there's a lot of schools actively looking for OC's right now. Yes, we are a major program, but there are more major programs with a lot more money to offer that we'd be competing with. So we could have found someone from the outside, but it would likely be a name that's further down our list than we'd like. So if you have a guy in your system that is seen as a up and coming guy, it's a safer bet to go that route than open it up and risk a rough coach search right before signing day.
 

Malty Flannel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2019
1,122
2,803
113
32
Huxley
Initially not excited; was hoping to infuse some outside perspective, and gain someone with past experience as OC to prevent another "learning on the job" experience like we had with Manning. On first glance, this just screams "we want to keep status quo".

Thinking on it more though, I like the *potential* of this hire. I think the comparison to Collin Klein is fair. Young guy, decorated former-QB, and highly thought of in coaching circles. I'll reserve opinion until I see on field results, but I'll give Campbell and Scheelhaase the benefit of the doubt right now and be excited to see how they round out the staff and what's in store for next season.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,860
24,998
113
Initially not excited; was hoping to infuse some outside perspective, and gain someone with past experience as OC to prevent another "learning on the job" experience like we had with Manning. On first glance, this just screams "we want to keep status quo".

Thinking on it more though, I like the *potential* of this hire. I think the comparison to Collin Klein is fair. Young guy, decorated former-QB, and highly thought of in coaching circles. I'll reserve opinion until I see on field results, but I'll give Campbell and Scheelhaase the benefit of the doubt right now and be excited to see how they round out the staff and what's in store for next season.

Based on the success we've seen over the past several years, is that a bad thing? This offensive scheme has shown to work. Just gotta be willing to take a risk at times. Hopefully Scheelhasse will be willing to do that and this offense looks more like it did when it was clicking than it did this year.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,157
7,758
113
Dubuque
I don't get it. He may be a great coach. However, can't we afford to get a proven guy who has done it before? I mean we are a major program. Go get a guy with a proven offensive scheme. I mean if you think about it, Nate has been learning from Manning. Do we really want the understudy of the guy we just fired?

There is nothing wrong with ISU's offensive scheme. It resulted in 30ppg over the 2017 to 2021 period. It's also a scheme that has helped ISU develop a strong defense.

Just because Scheelhaase worked for Manning doesn't mean Scheelhaase is a mirror image of Manning from a scheme standpoint. It also doesn't mean that Scheelhaase would call offensive plays exactly the same. Coaches steal from other coaches that they work with and observe- so I don't feel Nate is boxed in by being a Manning protege.

Obviously, talent can make a coach look great. But I have always felt playing calling is an art and a coach either has it or doesn't. We'll see if Scheelhaase has it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyence

CYCLNST8

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2008
11,368
13,518
113
Urbandale
www.gimikk.com
Personally I like the style we've been trying to establish- which is smash-mouth "power" spread with multiple TEs, large WRs, and powerful running backs, so I'm okay with keeping the system. The offensive line has been holding us back. Best of luck to Myers- can we please, please, PLEASE get an O-line coach (and strength coach) with a proven track record that can finally give us the power we need? The inability to convert in short yardage situations drives me insane. :mccaffery:
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron