Some good points you make here. I may give it another try.Except half of their games are on the SEC Net or B1G Net... which half the people say they dont want for the B12. No casual fan is going to switch to those networks....unless they are specifically a fan of those leagues or seeking one of those games. Our content that would be on a B12 network is on ESPN+ Just like these others have on their networks. Then all the rest of their content is on their streaming platforms, for VB, and Wrestling etc. Like ESPN+ B1G+ etc. All of our extra content is in one place. ESPN+
Do you want a B12 network? Do you want it to look like the PacNet, that is only available on a very select few sources? How much exposure are they getting for the casual fan? Sure the B1Gnet has a lot of subscribers, but how much does their extra content have? How much do the extra games and content on their streaming get seen. I know I never see it. But I see the extra content all over for all the Big 12 and SEC etc on ESPN+ Just like they see ours.
23M subs on ESPN+ up 7M in 1 year. Growing fast. I think a lot of casual fans are seeing the content. That is about 1/3 of the total subscribers for ESPN in the US(about 75M and dropping in '22) But growing. ESPN2,U,News etc have less than half the subs than that of the main channel.
43M subs on Hulu.
Soon ESPN+ will have just as much exposure as what ESPN2,U, and News have, and start to catch the main channel.
I have not seen the problem with the announcers etc that some have, for the most part. I mean sometimes they arent great, but its not like watching terrible B1GNet announcers, or big name national guys that only brag up SEC or B1G people. And I rarely have had any tech issues either. Sure sometimes it could be better product but it is light years better than CyTv was.
And Hey I didnt live in the metro until a few years ago, so I never had the luxury of seeing Iowa State on local TV. Some of you forget that. A few years ago if you didnt live in the metro area, it was pretty hard to see all the games, hell it was impossible. You were lucky to see a few.
Edit: the 75M ESPN main channel subs is for Cable and satellite. I didnt see that it did not include streaming until a second look. Streaming may be harder for them to discern with the combination of Plus in some packages. International numbers for the main channel are around 140M, but I dont know what content is shown in other countries. But the other sub channels like ESPN2, are in the 50Ms total.
As far as the espn+ announcers, they are prolly not that bad. I have in mind the one female pxp person, who I think is not great. But she might not be espn+ even.
I just wish you didn't have to have mulitple subscritions to get all the Cyclones or Big12 content. Until it evolves to something better (?), I still have John and Eric.