*** Official Oklahoma State vs IOWA STATE Game(Day) Thread ***

DrClone

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2009
1,377
747
113
It's not disappointing Omaha is not playing more. He's apparently not ready or he would be. It's great the others are playing so well. It would be disappointing if we had to play him. Hopefully he will stick with it and develop to the point we can't keep him off the floor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yellow Snow

ZRF

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2015
4,392
2,119
113
Just came here to say that Hason Ward has been an absolute stud since returning. I wonder if we beat Va. Tech and/or TAMU with Ward in the lineup.

Ward had been the best player on the floor by leaps and bounds, especially when judged on a per minute basis. That's no disrespect to Lipsey who is (obviously) the other consistent force.

OSU was up against the 8 ball given their circumstances but it still looked like they played with a decent amount of energy. This was probably the best we've looked all year from about the halfway point of the first half on with intensity, ball movement (best I've seen all year), and consistent attacking. There were a few rough possessions but the shot selection was typically outstanding. It was a great teak effort.

Aside from Ward who has been a force, the most positive development has been the evolution of Milan. He's now looking a lot more comfortable against the better athletes and has actually played some very solid defense. He's taking good shots and looking more comfortable with his timing and having to get shots off quicker when being defended by athletes. His rebounding, which was a pretty glaring deficiency is also getting better. He's not just standing there, watching and waiting for the ball to fall in his lap, he's bodying up and or attacking the ball, anticipating how it's coming off the rim. It may not sound like a lot, but that kind of play takes away 2 to 3 extended possessions from the opposition.

It's the best we've looked all year. Hopefully we will be able to take this on the road and perform much better than wr typically have under Otz but we will have to see.

Ward's first half, particularly the last 10 mins, was some of thr best basketball I've seen a Cyclone play. The dude was unstoppable and was dominating in every phase. He's so much fun to watch.
 

ZRF

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2015
4,392
2,119
113
Yes but since then there have been some very good front courts.

Ejim/George
Jackson/Homan
Hubalek/Clark
Brackins/Johnson/Clark

Also let's give Stevie his due. It wasn't all Fizer.

This is probably the only legit front court we've had that's had the combination of size, depth, and some kind of offensive/defensive balance. Some listed were better offensively while others were untraditional front courts that lacked size. Obviously this isn't the most offensively astute version we've had, but it might end up being the best from a depth, size, and balance perspective.
 

ZRF

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2015
4,392
2,119
113
It's not disappointing Omaha is not playing more. He's apparently not ready or he would be. It's great the others are playing so well. It would be disappointing if we had to play him. Hopefully he will stick with it and develop to the point we can't keep him off the floor.

It was disappointing that we didn't use the weak noncon to get him more minutes and give him a CHANCE to be more of a factor during the conference season. Giving 20+ minutes to Pavs, who was never going to be a factor in conference, was a brutal coaching decision. Those minutes would have been better served going to Omaha and Watson.

Now that ship has sailed I don't have a problem with Omaha's usage. But Otz missed an opportunity and I don't really see how one can try to spin that. It is what it is.
 

CRCySpy

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2020
336
762
93
54
Cedar Rapids, IA
Milan if we throw him among the 2023 five-star freshmen is:

- One of five to start every game
- 1st in minutes per game
- 4th in points per game

Not bad for a mere four-star.
Any chance he is one and done? I think he needs another year for the speed and physical play of the NBA, but NBA teams draft on youth and potential. Milan has a high ceiling.
 

psi

Member
Dec 28, 2009
127
19
18
And Paul Shirley was an NBA guy. That team was pretty deep.
Great team, but I wouldn't call it deep. The starting five all averaged well over 30 minutes, and the only other player with significant minutes was the 6th man Shirley.
 

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2012
9,884
9,630
113
Rural U.S.A.
I’d put a decent amount of money on staying unranked. After Houston lost again tonight, not sure if that win still looks as good

Houston will probably still be in top ten. Kansas, Purdue, Tennessee and Arizona all lost as well. Still a top ten win for ISU. I think ISU will be ranked.
 
Last edited:

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2012
9,884
9,630
113
Rural U.S.A.
Any chance he is one and done? I think he needs another year for the speed and physical play of the NBA, but NBA teams draft on youth and potential. Milan has a high ceiling.

He needs to develop more in the "S&Q" and strength categories. Ball handling as well. I'd give him another year or two.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: CRCySpy

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2012
9,884
9,630
113
Rural U.S.A.
Yes but since then there have been some very good front courts.

Ejim/George
Jackson/Homan
Hubalek/Clark
Brackins/Johnson/Clark

Also let's give Stevie his due. It wasn't all Fizer.

Don't forget Shirley and Rancik to go along with Stevie Johnson.
 

swiacy

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2009
2,206
2,002
113
Any chance he is one and done? I think he needs another year for the speed and physical play of the NBA, but NBA teams draft on youth and potential. Milan has a high ceiling.
I compare Milan to Gradey **** at KU last year. Both are 6’8”, same type body and shooters that can create a shot and instantly high minute starters as freshman. Gradey went one and done and I have no idea how his career has gone. I don’t think Milan is the pure 3 point shooter that Gradey is and I think Milan is more physical inside and has a better fade shot. Milan is a more all around skilled player who could use another year at this level to grow and perfect his game. But maybe that will happen as this season progresses and some GM throws a boatload of money at him.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Lineup and CRCySpy

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2012
9,884
9,630
113
Rural U.S.A.
Great team, but I wouldn't call it deep. The starting five all averaged well over 30 minutes, and the only other player with significant minutes was the 6th man Shirley.

Richard Evans and Irkel's cousin played quite a bit as well. That faded as March came along though.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,358
47,032
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
OSU getting 12 pts. I'm concerned that this is a classic let down spot for ISU. Just got over a emotional physical Houston game. Not a lot of juice in Hilton due to low attendance and the opponent. Hope we win but 12 pts is too much for me to lay.
Last night was another example of how you should add at least 6 points to the line for the home team if the weather is really REALLY bad
 

Marcelason78

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2022
3,817
4,451
113
Ward had been the best player on the floor by leaps and bounds, especially when judged on a per minute basis. That's no disrespect to Lipsey who is (obviously) the other consistent force.…..
Lipsey leads this team in almost every statistical category. Saying Tamin is not our best player is certainly disrespectful. By leaps and bounds.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,358
47,032
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
I compare Milan to Gradey **** at KU last year. Both are 6’8”, same type body and shooters that can create a shot and instantly high minute starters as freshman. Gradey went one and done and I have no idea how his career has gone. I don’t think Milan is the pure 3 point shooter that Gradey is and I think Milan is more physical inside and has a better fade shot. Milan is a more all around skilled player who could use another year at this level to grow and perfect his game. But maybe that will happen as this season progresses and some GM throws a boatload of money at him.
Gradey is a magnitude of order better athlete than Milan, in terms of explosiveness. He's also listed as 2" shorter and 15# lighter than Milan.

He's on the Raptors roster after being taken with the 13th pick, but he hasn't played much, ~12 minutes a game and has only played in half their games. He's shooting 24% from 3 and 35% from the field.

I think there's very different answers as to whether Milan could get drafted, should go pro, or will. I don't think he will, or should, but it's really hard to predict anything in the current CBB environment
 

MJ271

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 9, 2012
2,123
2,744
113
Atkins
I compare Milan to Gradey **** at KU last year. Both are 6’8”, same type body and shooters that can create a shot and instantly high minute starters as freshman. Gradey went one and done and I have no idea how his career has gone. I don’t think Milan is the pure 3 point shooter that Gradey is and I think Milan is more physical inside and has a better fade shot. Milan is a more all around skilled player who could use another year at this level to grow and perfect his game. But maybe that will happen as this season progresses and some GM throws a boatload of money at him.
I was about to respond, but @bawbie beat me to it. **** is a much better athlete than MM is or ever will be, which makes his ceiling higher as an all-around scorer rather than just a shooter.

Going a little bit further back, I think Doug McDermott is the better overall comparison, at least offensively. McDermott was still able to be a lottery pick, but only after 3 straight years averaging 20+ points on fantastic shooting efficiency (granted, against weaker competition, but still incredible numbers).
 
  • Informative
Reactions: CRCySpy

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,623
79,907
113
DSM
Gradey is a magnitude of order better athlete than Milan, in terms of explosiveness. He's also listed as 2" shorter and 15# lighter than Milan.

He's on the Raptors roster after being taken with the 13th pick, but he hasn't played much, ~12 minutes a game and has only played in half their games. He's shooting 24% from 3 and 35% from the field.

I think there's very different answers as to whether Milan could get drafted, should go pro, or will. I don't think he will, or should, but it's really hard to predict anything in the current CBB environment

He’s not on any mocks that I’ve seen out there. There’s a really nice crop of euros/foreign guys this year, but more of the freaky long 6’8” guys that can handle, have a passable 3 ball, guard 3-4 spots and block shots variety.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: CRCySpy

singsing

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2007
2,303
1,658
113
Any chance he is one and done? I think he needs another year for the speed and physical play of the NBA, but NBA teams draft on youth and potential. Milan has a high ceiling.
That fadeaway jumper is going to be broadcasted nightly on ESPN. I think we'll get another year, but if I was a NBA gm I couldn't help not seeing a future Larry Bird. I agree, body development is about the only thing he needs at this point too. I think it's up to him because I think he'd get drafted pretty early if he chose to go.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CRCySpy

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,358
47,032
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
OSU was up against the 8 ball given their circumstances but it still looked like they played with a decent amount of energy. This was probably the best we've looked all year from about the halfway point of the first half on with intensity, ball movement (best I've seen all year), and consistent attacking. There were a few rough possessions but the shot selection was typically outstanding. It was a great teak effort.
I agree with this. Per my favorite metrics site (haslametrics), it was our best defensive efficiency game since holding Grambling to 37. But we still missed our expected offensive efficiency output slightly, because of the missed 3s. If we are hitting our 3s - even 35%, with the same ball movement and intensity, we can beat anyone on any court.
Aside from Ward who has been a force, the most positive development has been the evolution of Milan. He's now looking a lot more comfortable against the better athletes and has actually played some very solid defense. He's taking good shots and looking more comfortable with his timing and having to get shots off quicker when being defended by athletes. His rebounding, which was a pretty glaring deficiency is also getting better. He's not just standing there, watching and waiting for the ball to fall in his lap, he's bodying up and or attacking the ball, anticipating how it's coming off the rim. It may not sound like a lot, but that kind of play takes away 2 to 3 extended possessions from the opposition.
Milan is starting to figure out how to be assertive and aggressive against BigXII defenses. I think he still has a chance of leading the team in scoring on the season if he and Tamin get that figured out and they run the offense through him a bit more (he's currently 25 points behind Tamin)
It's the best we've looked all year. Hopefully we will be able to take this on the road and perform much better than wr typically have under Otz but we will have to see.
I think we get at least one on this road trip this week, and have a legit shot in both. I think we match up pretty well against both teams, but I'll save that for another post
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRCySpy and ZRF

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,284
55,188
113
Great team, but I wouldn't call it deep. The starting five all averaged well over 30 minutes, and the only other player with significant minutes was the 6th man Shirley.

I guess I'm talking talented/quality depth. Having a guy come off the bench that would spend some time in the NBA is not common at ISU.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron