Here comes the doomsday thread, sorry

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,846
2,723
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Probably because the ACC has teams people want to see. The new Big 12, as far as football goes, doesn't really have that.

LOL. I can think of maybe 4-5 teams people want to see in that conference. I'm including ND in that count.
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,626
10,111
113
38
They care exactly like the Big Ten cares about “academics”.

I mentioned when I outlined who has really been relegated that they don‘t count because they don’t care. If this was even 1% about academics like you claimed they’d have been the jewel above any Big Ten or Pac school.
Man I respect you but you’re letting emotions affect your reading comprehension. I never said anything about this committee being about academics.

Again those schools got relegated to another current P4 conference so not even relegation. Considering how much of disaster the Pac leadership was you can’t be surprised when you waste hundreds of millions on conference offices a failed network and private jets.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: nrg4isu

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,626
10,111
113
38
If? Lol. Sanky already tried a huge power grab with the college playoffs and the whole Texas OU fiasco. Paired with ESPN trying to blow up the big 12 during that. We already know their preferred outcome.
I don’t know anything about the inner workings of the SEC but it takes two to tango. OUT really didn’t want to be in the Big12 and even after those moves the Big12 is intact with a great media deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1UNI2ISU

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,688
66,033
113
LA LA Land
Man I respect you but you’re letting emotions affect your reading comprehension. I never said anything about this committee being about academics.

Again those schools got relegated to another current P4 conference so not even relegation. Considering how much of disaster the Pac leadership was you can’t be surprised when you waste hundreds of millions on conference offices a failed network and private jets.

You expressed yourself very poorly here I guess. If this was 100% sarcasm than I agree.
"Good thing these are institutions of higher learning not businesses."

Tiers of demotion I previously posted:
- WSU/Ore St got relegated, it's real, it sucks
- Cal/Stan demoted to a ridiculous island, doesn't matter, they don't care...but for their student athletes that's a horrible solution
- UConn/USF, doesn't matter they had only gotten just promoted to a very weakened fb conference
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,626
10,111
113
38
You expressed yourself very poorly here I guess. If this was 100% sarcasm than I agree.
"Good thing these are institutions of higher learning not businesses."

Tiers of demotion I previously posted:
- WSU/Ore St got relegated, it's real, it sucks
- Cal/Stan demoted to a ridiculous island, doesn't matter, they don't care...but for their student athletes that's a horrible solution
- UConn/USF, doesn't matter they had only gotten just promoted to a very weakened fb conference
I said that in direct response to your very post “You cannot trust people to want something to be profitable in 20 or 50 years, you can expect people to want to maximize their payday now. This is almost a universal constant in the business world.”

And I accurately pointed out that they aren’t business they are institutions of higher learning whos mission has nothing to do with maximizing profit. Again I get you’re fired up but read exactly what I’m saying not what you think I’m saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneErik

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,688
66,033
113
LA LA Land
I said that in direct response to your very post “You cannot trust people to want something to be profitable in 20 or 50 years, you can expect people to want to maximize their payday now. This is almost a universal constant in the business world.”

And I accurately pointed out that they aren’t business they are institutions of higher learning whos mission has nothing to do with maximizing profit. Again I get you’re fired up but read exactly what I’m saying not what you think I’m saying.

Sure, they're institutions of higher learning that easily rejected two of the top three universities in the world.

That's insane. If I'm fired up it's over that nonsensical statement more than the reality of what's been happening for decades.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,180
27,854
113
Dez Moy Nez
I don’t know anything about the inner workings of the SEC but it takes two to tango. OUT really didn’t want to be in the Big12 and even after those moves the Big12 is intact with a great media deal.
Great? If half of the B1G and SEC payout is 'great' then ok.
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,626
10,111
113
38
Sure, they're institutions of higher learning that easily rejected two of the top three universities in the world.

That's insane. If I'm fired up it's over that nonsensical statement more than the reality of what's been happening for decades.
Yeah they rejected two awesome schools because it’s about athletic membership? Your comment was entirely about short term profit which is what I was responding to with that statement.

Also those two schools are still in the P4. If they would have cared enough to have responsible Pac12 leadership this wouldn’t have been an issue but they don’t care about sports so they let their conference be be run into the ground.
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,626
10,111
113
38
Great? If half of the B1G and SEC payout is 'great' then ok.
Texas has had more money than anyone for decades and it hasn’t don’t much for them. Vanderbilt and Indiana have had more money for the big 12 for decades as well and they haven’t done anything with it.

The contract is great because it secures a financial future for years to come with a membership base of peers.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,688
66,033
113
LA LA Land
Yeah they rejected two awesome schools because it’s about athletic membership? Your comment was entirely about short term profit which is what I was responding to with that statement.

Also those two schools are still in the P4. If they would have cared enough to have responsible Pac12 leadership this wouldn’t have been an issue but they don’t care about sports so they let their conference be be run into the ground.

Sounds like you agree with me academic prestige, research, etc is all an afterthought in these purely athletic $$$ decisions. If it mattered you take the world's greatest when available. So maybe claiming "higher learning" mattered was bs on your part.

It's a business, the same way mega churches are businesses even if they aren't technically classified the exact same way as Google or Starbucks.
 

trevn

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2006
5,489
11,715
113
Eastern Iowa
I haven't read much of this thread and I assume what I'm about to say has been said in different ways about 100 times already. There's clearly a need for some organization and oversight over collegiate athletics as the current system isn't sustainable in my opinion. It's a tough call though, because it looks as if organization and oversight leads down the road to a P2 and if that's the case, collegiate athletics will lose a big part of what made it so popular in the first place.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,688
66,033
113
LA LA Land
I haven't read much of this thread and I assume what I'm about to say has been said in different ways about 100 times already. There's clearly a need for some organization and oversight over collegiate athletics as the current system isn't sustainable in my opinion. It's a tough call though, because it looks as if organization and oversight leads down the road to a P2 and if that's the case, collegiate athletics will lose a big part of what made it so popular in the first place.

Big Ten teams don't want more money because it's not a business. That summarizes the past couple pages.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,180
27,854
113
Dez Moy Nez
Texas has had more money than anyone for decades and it hasn’t don’t much for them. Vanderbilt and Indiana have had more money for the big 12 for decades as well and they haven’t done anything with it.

The contract is great because it secures a financial future for years to come with a membership base of peers.
Well the big payout hasn't quite hit yet for the big 2. We're gonna see obscene contracts for coaches in the following years.
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,626
10,111
113
38
Sounds like you agree with me academic prestige, research, etc is all an afterthought in these purely athletic $$$ decisions. If it mattered you take the world's greatest when available. So maybe claiming "higher learning" mattered was bs on your part.

It's a business, the same way mega churches are businesses even if they aren't technically classified the exact same way as Google or Starbucks.
Hahaha no it’s not, and again these are institutions of higher learning not for profit businesses. Comparing them to mega churches is pure emotions talking.

Again your reading comprehension is lacking because I didn’t say anything about research or academic prestige or anything of the sorts. You keep trying to put words in my mouth that I didn’t say.

So to explain, you said businesses can always be counted on for short term profit over long term stability/outlook. I said they aren’t businesses they are institutions of higher learning and aren’t focused on profit. Then you spend the next several posts making comments about completely unrelated things that I never said in reference to my higher learning response.

Hope that cleared it up, if you want to keep going try to quote what I actually said instead of inferring or infusing your own thoughts into my statements.
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,626
10,111
113
38
Well the big payout hasn't quite hit yet for the big 2. We're gonna see obscene contracts for coaches in the following years.
Agree on that one. Especially for assistants. However in what way does that change anything from how it has been? All the new money does is start saying the quiet and obvious part out loud.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,180
27,854
113
Dez Moy Nez
Agree on that one. Especially for assistants. However in what way does that change anything from how it has been? All the new money does is start saying the quiet and obvious part out loud.
It takes the best coaches and when they start paying players it will make it nearly impossible for the Big 12 to compete talent wise.
 

ClubCy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 8, 2023
4,278
6,748
113
Agree on that one. Especially for assistants. However in what way does that change anything from how it has been? All the new money does is start saying the quiet and obvious part out loud.
This is purely speculation on my part but this is what foresee with the revenue sharing inevitably coming. The top recruits have always been getting a bag that is no secret but I will use an example.

Say you have a 3-4 star player whose offer list is Iowa state, Kansas, KSU, Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota. I would imagine majority of the time that type of recruit wasn’t getting induced by money to a school. Now with revenue sharing that recruit will get FAR more money going to any of the big 10 schools than the big 12 schools. That’s where the talent gap will widen, in my opinion.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron