I do think the playoff (especially if they get to 16) definitely makes it more likely that a lower-talent team could win a game or two.I'd be surprised if the current B12 configuration ever has a top 10 team on talent (as determined by recruiting rankings). I went back through 2010 on 247 and didn't find a single year where any of us were in the top 15. NIL and the TV money gap probably isn't going to make that better.
I think the silver lining is that NIL also seems to be killing off the superteam era where Bama/Clemson/tOSU/SEC#2 were miles ahead of everyone else because they could stockpile talent. Michigan won it last year and was borderline by that criteria. Washington and TCU made the last two title games and were well outside of it. The #1 team right now is Texas, and while they're good I don't think of them as untouchable. We played them fairly close last year.
I'm hoping that even if we can't get top end talent in the B12, that talent will be more spread out at the top and give us more games like Michigan-TCU where we have a puncher's chance.
That Michigan TCU game was absolutely wild, though, and required so many things to go TCU’s way.. two pick sixes.
I feel like we are more likely to see some upsets (if nothing else because there are more opportunities), but I feel like it’s incredibly unlikely for a team of a “lesser” talent level to win it all. Now you don’t have to get “lucky” once or twice, you have to do it 3 or 4 times.
Obviously this is all relative, and I think it’s clear that ISU has a lot of talent, even if it’s not necessarily reflected in recruiting rankings.
I think we WILL see a lot more parity between some of the big name programs.