Now Jamie is arguing over X with the SMU AD. Quite frankly I just wish he'd be quiet.
Not a good look IMO.
Now Jamie is arguing over X with the SMU AD. Quite frankly I just wish he'd be quiet.
Edit: I just realized I'm really behind here. I don't come here that often. and I can see now that you posted this many pages ago. Sorry.Using your example, I'd love to see Iowa State play the P4 OOC teams Alabama has played in the Regular Season since 2006: Duke (ACC), Florida State (ACC) @ Jax, Clemson (ACC) @ Atlanta, Virginia Tech (ACC) @ Atlanta, Penn State (B1G), @ Duke (ACC), @ Penn State (B1G), Michigan (B1G) @ Arlington, Virginia Tech (ACC) @ Atlanta, West Virginia (Big XII) @ Atlanta, Wisconsin (B1G) @ Arlington, USC (Pac-12) @ Arlington, Florida State (ACC) @ Atlanta, Louisville (ACC) @ Orlando, Duke (ACC) @ Atlanta, Miami (Fla.) (ACC) @ Atlanta, @ Texas (Big XII), Texas (Big XII), @ Wisconsin (B1G). If ISU or any other Big XII team played a varied P4 OOC schedule like that over a 19 year spean with a (17-2) record, it would definitely help the Big XII's perception.
It’s neat how they kept ASU and ISU well behind Boise and moved UNLV up so the Broncos can grab that elusive top 20 win… It’s all f*cking scripted.They have totally set it up so that even if Boise St. loses they will be ranked ahead of the Big XII winner and there is zero justification for it.
Do you really think we would be significantly higher if we beat Tech, because I don’t. Our SOS is worse than Indiana’s, and they would stick us behind them. I agree that I still don’t understand why Boise State is where they are though…I am really shocked that they didn’t move up isu and asu closer to the 12 line so that they could would have an easier decision between Boise and the big 12. Kind of hard to justify taking Iowa state from 16 to 10 or 11 so they get the bye one week from now
They should have swapped asu and isu with ole miss and South Carolina.
Mouth breathers.
Of course if we would not have lost to tech we would be in the drivers seat
Speaking of whining, that’s all this entire thread is.Iowa State's two losses were not due to the schedule being too tough. If they only lost one of the games, they would be ranked ahead of Boise for sure and in the same neighborhood as S.M.U. and Indiana (who has at least pummelled teams).
Point is that Jamie likes to whine on twitter, when he could choose a different method. If S.M.U., Indiana and Boise have it so easy, give 'em a call and ask them to come out and play! Win-Win for us all.
He’s not the right person to do that though. And ISU isn’t the right school to call out Indiana or SMU. We didn’t play the other three 2-loss conference teams either. It comes off as hypocriticalI’m fine with Pollard going on social media to make his case. You have no chance of being heard if you don’t say anything, and we have legitimate gripes. It’s a rigged entertainment product and we’re on the wrong side of the haves and have nots. We all knew this from the beginning. Being silent is being complicit to this sham championship format.
That is true and fair. Hell, I am shocked that Alabama went 17-2 vs. those teams!This is a really flawed example. The Alabama you're talking about is the Alabama that had the best run of any program in NCAA history during Saban's run. Of course they went 17-2 against that schedule.
The rest of the SEC couldn't even duplicate that run, and you're saying that to be respected, the Big 12 has to. At least be fair when you're participating in this discussion.
Not a good look IMO.
Unless they get piss stomped, Penn State won’t move down. The committee isn’t gonna punish them for the extra data point. The nutsack they had on at the end of the show really hinted at that. Champ week for the SEC and B1G will only yield net positives for the winner, there won’t be consequences for losing.it won't be Penn St... not now that they're in the Big 10 championship game. Win that and they get first round bye and probably #2 seed; lose that and they fall probably to #6... behind Notre Dame, who'll be the #5.
The funniest thing? I was angry when they fired Mike Shula, thought he was getting a raw deal. I thought it was unfair.That is true and fair. My answer was to someone claiming that Alabama's OOC opponents were conveniently chosen with good names but down years. Hell, I am shocked that Alabama went 17-2 vs. those teams!
Do you really think we would be significantly higher if we beat Tech, because I don’t. Our SOS is worse than Indiana’s, and they would stick us behind them. I agree that I still don’t understand why Boise State is where they are though…
I was a Mike Shula fan too. I saw him play and coach. He did what he was brought in to do and even had a really good team in 2005 (10-2 Cotton Bowl Champion).The funniest thing? I was angry when they fired Mike Shula, thought he was getting a raw deal. I thought it was unfair.
The hindsight on that one is pretty hilarious. I think I just have rose-tinted glasses of Shula setting up Van Tiffin for The Kick.
Not a good look for ADs to be talking smack on X.Not a good look for SMU to point out they lost at home to the Big 12 but cut through an easy ACC like a warm knife through butter.
They only had a tough non conf because they scheduled some of those games when they were a g5 and their new league only plays 8.
It just means more! In fact, it means so much they get to take a crap ton of losses off their resumes.I hate that the SEC is essentially getting rewarded for playing one less conference game. And there never seems to be enough discussion around that.
Well, then ISU might as well go out and win the Big XII Championship! That is truly what matters the most, not who or where ISU might play in the CFP. Beating Arizona State is the most important thing on the schedule!I think we need to accept were likely going to South Bend or Happy Valley. Buckle up. (if we even win this weekend)
Not a good look for ADs to be talking smack on X.