Soooo ur sayin the coach is a good fit for the Sukeyes…. OK GREAT , let’s go with that !
***2025-26 Mens College Basketball Thread***
- Thread starter BigJCy
- Start date
NCState F4 last year because of a wild run and doesn't even have the chance this year.
How does Rodney Terry still have a job? Texas looks like ass. I thought they were supposed to have great players but they don’t play team ball at all.
I'll side with anyone who has a better resume than "a bunch of wins against terrible teams and a few losses. "
But yes, keep framing it as me being all about Oklahoma when you're the one that keeps bringing them up. I just demonstrate how even OU is more worthy. Yes, they have a few more losses because they played a bunch of top 20 teams. But they also didn't drop games to terrible teams like Murray State. We want the committee to reward taking on a tough schedule, and that means not punishing a team simply because they had an extremely difficult one.
They should have replaced him by now but haven’t. I am not sure they care about basketball.
They lost to LSU at home! That was literally LSU's only road win of the entire season.
Which is still a much better loss than 2 of drakes losses, so that is pretty irrelevant. Losing to Murray State at home is so much worse
Not to mention Drake needed overtime to avoid a few quad 4 losses. Theyre not even remotely one of the best 37 at large teams.
They got screwed when he made the run in the tournament with Beard's team there. They knew he wasn't the guy but there was no way they could fire him at that point.
Can't imagine they don't move on after this year.
Nonsense. You can always fire an interim. It was obvious he was out over his skis.
I'm done beating a dead horse over this. They'll be in the NCAA tourney regardless of what happens tommorow.
If they are are left out ill gladly admit you're right. I doubt you'll give the same courtesy though if I'm proven right.
You do love your straw men, that's not what I've ever been arguing.
The committee may very well do the wrong thing because (as we saw last year with our own seeding) it has a good number of members who can't wrap their heads around the metrics and are pretty simple. That doesn't make Drake one of the best 37 at larges regardless.
I really think that they should bring back the “last 10 games” into the criteria. Obviously wouldn’t be great for ISU this year, but I feel like how you’re playing leading into the tournament should mean more than what you did in November.
Ok, here's my final prediction, Drake is a lock to make the tournament right now.
What's your prediction? We'll come back to this next Sunday.
ACC conference play had zero (0) games where a ranked member played another ranked member.
ZERO
ZERO
You're moving goalposts.
You've likely figured out you're wrong in arguing the actual resumes, and have now moved on to "well this is what i think the committee will do"
I legit forget that they play games on the CW.
Man, has that league fallen.
