Just curious. Not trying to start a political war. But, why is everybody making a huge deal about "Saudi" money? Aren't they one of our allies? I know they have horrible laws, but how many athletes and movie stars take Chinese money? Is it more to due with the PGA not wanting the competition?
I have spent way too much time thinking through this and I really struggle with coming to a final conclusion. On one hand, the Saudis are ******* awful in pretty much every humanitarian aspect you could be. This is not to be debated and it's the simplest part of this whole equation.
In Stephen A. Smith's voice- HOWEVA
I have a little trouble with arguments posed at times. First, they're an American ally who the president is going to visit here shortly. Now, I fully realize that those two things are wildly different and the US relationship with them is born out of necessity while golf is just an entertainment product. The problem with that line of argument is that if it's
just and entertainment product, then why such a big deal? To me, you can't have it both ways where you downplay the importance of golf but then elevate the importance in regard to "sportswashing," which will bring me to my second point. The idea is that the Saudi's are doing this to help launder the perception people have a of them. The idea that that can actually work is almost offensive. I don't think people are that stupid and I don't think people are out there saying "Hey, Phil's playing for them, they must be good guys." It's just outrageous to me.
I will say that I would hold a different perspective on that side of things if this thing were ever to be profitable to the Saudi's. As it stands, the guys playing are simply taking money out of their pockets and it's most certainly not going to be returned in the short run to it's not like they are helping to fund the Kingdom. Again, if they were, totally different to me.
Then, I would like just one person to tell me where we're drawing the line on what is blood money and how many degrees of separation there needs to be for it to be acceptable. We know how Nike is making their products. So, it's fine for Rory to take Nike's money, partially made through human exploitation in China because it's been run through Nike? To be clear, I have zero problem with that but to me if we're going to talk "sportswashing" that's at least some level of it. I'm not going to sink to the level of "Well, did you drive your car today" as that's ridiculous but there has to be some sort of line. Maybe the line is just direct tie to the Saudi's and if it is, that's fine but I'm not sure that's really as virtuous as some may think. The China thing kind of boggles my mind. I'm still not really sure why people just willfully ignore what they have been and doing and continue to do over there. It's just kind of odd to me.
I think a lot of the outrage is born out of the frustration that there's nothing the existing golf establishment can do because the Saudi's are the only people out there who have the runway to do this. The PGL could probably offer a little more than the TOUR but they aren't offering these numbers. As I've said before, the TOUR has way too many liabilities on the balance sheet to even sniff those numbers and they're essentially just going to have to sit around and see what happens. If it's money, they're going to lose.