Stanford is in a heck of a tough spot with Shaw too.They do, and Stanford is horrible. But ND does have the #2 class for next year, if they can retain them.
Stanford is in a heck of a tough spot with Shaw too.They do, and Stanford is horrible. But ND does have the #2 class for next year, if they can retain them.
I don’t think they really care.Stanford is in a heck of a tough spot with Shaw too.
What happened to Stanford? They had a great run for awhile and have fallen off a cliff it seems like.Stanford is in a heck of a tough spot with Shaw too.
Huard is losing his ****.these announcers are idiots on this USC game
Yea he is! Man this game is bumping. These fans are loud!Huard is losing his ****.
I seem to recall an inadvertent whistle costing us a big play in the early 2000s. I feel like it was a home game against Colorado.Timeout during the play? I've never heard of that before.
insane. couldn't believe they added those seconds back.Timeout during the play? I've never heard of that before.
It was the refs mistake to stop the clock during the play. Once the error had been made, they really didn't have any choice but to put the time back on.insane. couldn't believe they added those seconds back.
weird and bad rule.It was the refs mistake to stop the clock during the play. Once the error had been made, they really didn't have any choice but to put the time back on.
USC is going to be really good with Riley. Of course their opponents are about to get in the B1G, but he’ll have them competing.
I get why it seems that way, but there's no other way for it to work. If a ref accidentally blows a whistle, it has to be the end of the play. You can't have players playing beyond the whistle, even if it's inadvertent and in error. There's just no way for it to be any other way. A whistle can't be subjective, no matter when it's blown. Because if players can keep playing beyond a whistle, it opens up possibilities of all kind of stuff you don't want to happen.weird and bad rule.