2024 NCAA Tournament Thread

Ms3r4ISU

Me: Mea culpa. Also me: Sine cura sis.
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 7, 2008
12,917
8,464
113
Ames
Sure seems like a lot of fouls being ignored. UConn- Duke game.
 

theshadow

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
20,020
19,727
113
Every E8 game this weekend is 1 vs 3.


SUNDAY 3/31
12:00 (ABC) - (3) Oregon State vs (1) South Carolina (at Albany)
2:00 (ABC) - (3) N.C. State vs (1) Texas (at Portland)

MONDAY 4/1
6:15 (ESPN) - (3) LSU vs (1) Iowa (at Albany)
8:15 (ESPN) - (3) UConn vs (1) USC (at Portland)
 

Three4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
4,260
2,889
113
West Des Moines
They aren’t deep at all, They typically only play 7 girls. They are an average shooting team, decent at defense and physical but foul trouble has played them all year.

They are relentless on the offensive glass. If it’s a super physical game where they call a lot of fouls that will hurt LSU just as much as it does. Iowa, probably a little bit more….
LSU is the 17th best shooting team in NCAA women's basketball, that is above average. They are 3rd in scoring offense (85.9 ppg), and they allow teams to score 62.5 points per game (128th). LSU out rebounds their opponents by 12.6 per game. LSU holds their opponents to 36.6% shooting.

Iowa isn't really that deep, they play more players but those extra players play very few minutes, just look at the Iowa/WVU box score. Iowa has the 304th best defense in NCAA Women's basketball (71.1 ppg). Iowa is # 2 in field goal percentage, and first in points per game. Iowa ou rebounds their opponents by 7.6 per game. Iowa holds their opponents to 39.6% shooting

In LSU's five losses, they had one foul out total in the five losses. In those five losses they had 87 fouls, their opponents had 86 fouls. If foul trouble was such an issue, they wouldn't be 31-5.

LSU is a better defensive team than Iowa and has no issues playing at Iowa's pace. Iowa likes to play fast, and that is how they beat teams. LSU can play fast, and Kim will have no issues pushing the officials.
 

cmhawks99

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2008
1,468
-14
48
55
Bourbonnais, Il
LSU is the 17th best shooting team in NCAA women's basketball, that is above average. They are 3rd in scoring offense (85.9 ppg), and they allow teams to score 62.5 points per game (128th). LSU out rebounds their opponents by 12.6 per game. LSU holds their opponents to 36.6% shooting.

Iowa isn't really that deep, they play more players but those extra players play very few minutes, just look at the Iowa/WVU box score. Iowa has the 304th best defense in NCAA Women's basketball (71.1 ppg). Iowa is # 2 in field goal percentage, and first in points per game. Iowa ou rebounds their opponents by 7.6 per game. Iowa holds their opponents to 39.6% shooting

In LSU's five losses, they had one foul out total in the five losses. In those five losses they had 87 fouls, their opponents had 86 fouls. If foul trouble was such an issue, they wouldn't be 31-5.

LSU is a better defensive team than Iowa and has no issues playing at Iowa's pace. Iowa likes to play fast, and that is how they beat teams. LSU can play fast, and Kim will have no issues pushing the officials.

I’ve watched them both play 50 times. Seen all their losses in fact. I doubt you’re going to add any insight to what I’ve seen. I do appreciate you trying.

But you want them to lose, so your reviewing best envisions it happening.

Iowa opened as a favorite by the way. It will be a hell of a game and I believe Iowa wins….

Good call bringing up the West Va game. I read a recap that suggested although some might be concerned after that game, they shouldn’t be….

It was a really telling game. Iowa shot terribly and won by 10, holding West Va to their 2nd lowest output all year. Iowa has proved they can win in any game.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Three4Cy

BoxsterCy

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 14, 2009
48,478
47,409
113
Minnesota
I’ve watched them both play 50 times. Seen all their losses in fact. I doubt you’re going to add any insight to what I’ve seen. I do appreciate you trying.

But you want them to lose, so your reviewing best envisions it happening.

Iowa opened as a favorite by the way. It will be a hell of a game and I believe Iowa wins….

Good call bringing up the West Va game. I read a recap that suggested although some might be concerned after that game, they shouldn’t be….

It was a really telling game. Iowa shot terribly and won by 10, holding West Va to their 2nd lowest output all year. Iowa has proved they can win in any game.

Wonder what the TV viewer numbers will be for the game? Colorado game was at 3.3M, less than the WVU game of 4.9M but still one of the top views of the season. Not an ABC game but still should be a yuge viewing.

BTW, I might be the only one here that doesn't believe (1) Clark is bad person (2) Clark hype is bad for WBB (3) Clark's teammates hate her (4) Bluder is a terrible coach (5) my DR niece graduated from a terrible school. :rolleyes:

Absent those I am able to just watch as a WBB fan. Your task of trying to have any reasonable or remotely objective discussion is probably going to be futile. I've looked for a place to talk WBB hoops but other than the Boneyard, and it's deep east coast bias, there just isn't anywhere that isn't elite team centric.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cmhawks99

cmhawks99

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2008
1,468
-14
48
55
Bourbonnais, Il
Wonder what the TV viewer numbers will be for the game? Colorado game was at 3.3M, less than the WVU game of 4.9M but still one of the top views of the season. Not an ABC game but still should be a yuge viewing.

BTW, I might be the only one here that doesn't believe (1) Clark is bad person (2) Clark hype is bad for WBB (3) Clark's teammates hate her (4) Bluder is a terrible coach (5) my DR niece graduated from a terrible school. :rolleyes:

Absent those I am able to just watch as a WBB fan. Your task of trying to have any reasonable or remotely objective discussion is probably going to be futile. I've looked for a place to talk WBB hoops but other than the Boneyard, and it's deep east coast bias, there just isn't anywhere that isn't elite team centric.

Well let’s be honest. I’m an Iowa fan and I love watching her play, but I get irritated as hell watching her at times and over the top coverage is too much. I didn’t like it when my kids did it and you’ll find most of the fans I’ve interacted with don’t condone it nor does her dad.

With that said… after 20,000+ peewee, junior high, high school, college, professional, sporting events anybody that has got themselves convinced she is somehow the worst of the worse is bitter and jealous. It’s that simple….

As far as LSU goes, they’re a tough out, but they’re not any better than they were last year and metric wise Iowa has been.

Her teammates clearly don’t hate and she’s definitely not bad for women’s basketball… I’ll admit I haven’t read much about her over here, but I can imagine what fans are saying.
 

acoustimac

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2009
9,273
10,873
113
Lamoni, IA
Wonder what the TV viewer numbers will be for the game? Colorado game was at 3.3M, less than the WVU game of 4.9M but still one of the top views of the season. Not an ABC game but still should be a yuge viewing.

BTW, I might be the only one here that doesn't believe (1) Clark is bad person (2) Clark hype is bad for WBB (3) Clark's teammates hate her (4) Bluder is a terrible coach (5) my DR niece graduated from a terrible school. :rolleyes:

Absent those I am able to just watch as a WBB fan. Your task of trying to have any reasonable or remotely objective discussion is probably going to be futile. I've looked for a place to talk WBB hoops but other than the Boneyard, and it's deep east coast bias, there just isn't anywhere that isn't elite team centric.
I’m not sure anyone on here believes that Clark is a bad person. Most don’t like her on court demeanor. That doesn’t make her a bad person. She's doing some wonderful things with her charity and relates to the public quite well. I’m also not sure how anyone could think she's bad for WBB. She's definitely made it more relevant and put it in more people's radars. Been lots of talk about how the WBB is more viewable than the men’s tournament. I might fall in the "don’t like Bluder" as a person category, but she has surrounded herself with some top notch assistants that develop talent.
 

theshadow

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
20,020
19,727
113
At least one of the 3-point lines in Portland is wrong. They appear to be different on each end of the floor -- shorter on camera left.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: throwittoblythe

BoxsterCy

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 14, 2009
48,478
47,409
113
Minnesota
Well we got the "nobody believed we would be in this place, right here" from Staley.

Sort of in the same WTF category as Angel Reese's comments yesterday.

Such underdogs! Nobody expected us to be this good this year! We had to prove everyone was wrong! We believed in ourselves when nobody else did. Yada yada yada.

I'll admit to really hating the "nobody believed in us" crap. It's sort of pet peeve of mine.
 

Three4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
4,260
2,889
113
West Des Moines
I can't remember her name but the 40ish white woman with the black hair always worn in a ponytail moved up to reffing the men's games. She was in Hilton multiple times this yr
Amy Bonner

We used to see her a lot until she got promoted to the men's side.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NWICY

ClubCy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 8, 2023
4,403
6,928
113
NCAA women's tourney only has to have two floors for the S16/E8 and they still manage to screw it up.
Was this pointed out during the Sweet 16? I can’t imagine they played 2-3 games on TELEVISION and no-one noticed a difference until now.