If that was the case, he shouldn’t have transferred to Texas.Sure, they have better offensive players. I just think we'll continue to lose/not attract good offensive players if all we do is run a high post handoff with 3 guys standing around the perimeter. Think Hunter saw that writing on the walll.
He wanted to be a part of that Chris Beard "culture".If that was the case, he shouldn’t have transferred to Texas.
Houston looks good on paper but they haven’t beaten anyone. They played one good team and lost.Last year ISU lost to TCU at home 44-59 (-15)
Then they turned around and beat TCU in FW 54-51 (+3)
Using the transitive property ISU was 18 points better than ISU.
Claiming that all we is run a high post handoff with 3 guys standing around is a clear indicator that you are completely clueless. You must have missed the significant % of possessions where a pure motion offense is run or too flippin dumb to recognize it.Sure, they have better offensive players. I just think we'll continue to lose/not attract good offensive players if all we do is run a high post handoff with 3 guys standing around the perimeter. Think Hunter saw that writing on the walll.
Wow! Now if that would translate to real life, fantastic!! My own opinion on a different team is that U Conn is the best team in the USA!Strictly working with the #s against a single common opponent, the answer is YES! Beyond that, probably gonna go with a negative.
(All stats are from barttorvik.com)
Opponent is North Carolina A&T
Score
ISU 80-43 (+37)
Houston 74-46 (+28)
Game Tempo
Both games had a tempo of 68 which I find interesting
Adjusted Offense (highest # better)
ISU 111.2
Hou 103.6
Adjusted Defense (lowest # better)
ISU 72.2
Hou 76.2
Game Score
ISU 99
Hou 97
Now North Carolina A&T's #s
Adj O
vs ISU 79.6
vs Hou 90.8
Adj D
vs ISU 112.1
vs Hou 94.8
GS
vs ISU 2
vs Hou 38
So there it is people undeniable proof that we are in fact better than Houston.
Last year ISU lost to TCU at home 44-59 (-15)
Then they turned around and beat TCU in FW 54-51 (+3)
Using the transitive property ISU was 18 points better than ISU.
Last year ISU lost to TCU at home 44-59 (-15)
Then they turned around and beat TCU in FW 54-51 (+3)
Using the transitive property ISU was 18 points better than ISU.
We are a defensive-minded team. We don’t have players with good offensive skills.Claiming that all we is run a high post handoff with 3 guys standing around is a clear indicator that you are completely clueless. You must have missed the significant % of possessions where a pure motion offense is run or too flippin dumb to recognize it.
Not sure why you a quoting me. I made no assertions about Houston. My only point there was the fallacy of transitive property in sports scores since the transitive property I used "proved" that Iowa State was 18 points better than Iowa State.Houston looks good on paper but they haven’t beaten anyone. They played one good team and lost.
I award you zero points and may God have mercy on your soul.Claiming that all we is run a high post handoff with 3 guys standing around is a clear indicator that you are completely clueless. You must have missed the significant % of possessions where a pure motion offense is run or too flippin dumb to recognize it.
They won’t be for long.Is Houston really #1 team? I am not impressed with Houston.
UH was #1. Now #5.Is Houston really #1 team? I am not impressed with Houston.
Well can you honestly say ISU wasn't 18 points better than ISU...granted it'd be rough with our offense going against our defense..sadly I think the defense would score moreLast year ISU lost to TCU at home 44-59 (-15)
Then they turned around and beat TCU in FW 54-51 (+3)
Using the transitive property ISU was 18 points better than ISU.
I'm perturbed.The transitive property in sports is kind of like how I can prove that I am my own grandpa.
I'm kind of disappointed that nobody got the reference.