The idea that you can not consent while under the influence of alcohol is ridiculous.
Drunk sex is not tantamount to rape.
Is there a double standard here? Men are treated as potential rapists, and women as their helpless victims. If two young people get hammered and have drunken sex, he is responsible for his behaviour, but she is not responsible for hers. Even if she does say "yes" its up to him to figure out whether she means it.
To be clear, obviously someone who is passed out or near unconscious cannot consent to sexual intercourse. Men have physical strength on their side and have some extra duty to rein in disinhibitions. Some dudes really are predators, and prey on women. But in my opinion, the truth is that most drunk sex basically involves "stuff I wouldn't have done when I was sober". It used to be that this was an unfortunate learning experience and you move on. Today, she's told its a devastating trauma that's is not her fault.
In any other circumstance other than sex, if you get drunk and act like an idiot you are liable for your actions. If a woman gets hammered and acts like an idiot in public, she is liable for her actions and could be arrested. If you get wasted and get behind the wheel of a car, you are responsible for that decision as well. Why would sex be any different?
This idea "infantilizes women, strips them of there agency and treats them like victorian damsels of distress".
I'm sure I'll be labeled as a misogynist, rapist enabling, pig by some idiots like CyPhillis on here.