So the cops registered 60 decibels outside the apartment? That is what makes this so incredible. That is low...like under normal converstion low. A crowded resturant would be around 80 decibels.....wow.
pretty sure they do the reading outside the building as in the street not outside the actual apartment door. 60 would be loud if it was taken from the street
I think Hines tweeted that Ames's ordinance for that time of day is 55, so it was technically too loud, but pretty closeBut would it be against the law loud????
One thing missing here is that as much right as the neighbor has to his rights, BDJ has the right to listen to music at a non-illegal level as well.
But would it be against the law loud????
One thing missing here is that as much right as the neighbor has to his rights, BDJ has the right to listen to music at a non-illegal level as well.
But would it be against the law loud????
One thing missing here is that as much right as the neighbor has to his rights, BDJ has the right to listen to music at a non-illegal level as well.
It's pretty amazing to read this thread and see so many jump on the neighbor making the complaint as though somehow in all of this, he is the bad guy.
According to the story, he reported this to the police several times, and seemed to try and handle it before it got to this point. If the meeting with BDJ, the police, the neighbor and CFH did indeed take place, and it was agreed by all that the problems would cease, then they should have stopped. If BDJ just ignored CFH in all this.....then sorry, but I have a problem with that, and I am guessing that CFH might have a problem with it too. It's not like BDJ was a choir boy before he came to Ames. He already had a history, and he was given another chance by CFH. If he then pisses on that relationship and opportunity by not doing what CFH asked him to do.... To me the onus is on him to live up to the agreement. It's not like he is some mis-behaving 16 year old or even a freshman in college. He is a 22 year-old, 5th year senior....it's time to grow up a little bit.
you're eliminating the possibility that some neighbors are just whiny a-holes. Consider yourself lucky if you've never had one. One neighbor routinely called child services on my parents and my parents were incredible parents. Some neighbors simply want to start ****.
Someone posted that 55 is the Ames limit at that time, so yes.
Obviously, these guys have failed at working out their differences. That much is obvious.
In terms of the program, it just comes down to how this relates to the relationship between BDJ and Fred. If it's a matter of blatant disrespect, Fred will handle it. If not, play on and learn to be a good neighbor.
Someone posted that 55 is the Ames limit at that time, so yes.
Obviously, these guys have failed at working out their differences. That much is obvious.
In terms of the program, it just comes down to how this relates to the relationship between BDJ and Fred. If it's a matter of blatant disrespect, Fred will handle it. If not, play on and learn to be a good neighbor.
I"m not eliminating that at all, but it really is besides the point. So what you are saying is that because the neighbor might be a whiny little brat, that BDJ should just ignore what CFH asked him to do in the meeting, if it took place as claimed? I don't care what the neighbor did, or what he is like. If it was bad enough that it took a meeting with the police, CFH, BDJ and the neighbor, and BDJ agreed to change the behavior, then he is in the wrong for not doing it. He is not a child. Time to grow up a little and act like a man, not some kind of an idiot.you're eliminating the possibility that some neighbors are just whiny a-holes. Consider yourself lucky if you've never had one. One neighbor routinely called child services on my parents and my parents were incredible parents. Some neighbors simply want to start ****.
Obviously we don't know what Fred's stance is, but I can make the argument that Fred thinks this kid is a loser and BDJ is fine. It will be in the middle, but it goes both ways.I"m not eliminating that at all, but it really is besides the point. So what you are saying is that because the neighbor might be a whiny little brat, that BDJ should just ignore what CFH asked him to do in the meeting, if it took place as claimed? I don't care what the neighbor did, or what he is like. If it was bad enough that it took a meeting with the police, CFH, BDJ and the neighbor, and BDJ agreed to change the behavior, then he is in the wrong for not doing it. He is not a child. Time to grow up a little and act like a man, not some kind of an idiot.