No one needed to see that pic. Kids visit this site.
Sounds like a parenting issue.
No one needed to see that pic. Kids visit this site.
Because everyone recovers from injuries/surgeries exactly the same way.
I have to be reading this wrong. Neither was Morris? Players don't come more point guardy than ISU's point guard. He was brought in as the ISU point guard of the future but ended up playing next to Kane his freshman year because Fred brought in Kane after Morris had committed. If not for Kane, Morris likely would have started at the point his very first game at ISU. If I am misreading your meaning, please set me straight.
That was also in March of 2013. How did Ware fare last year?
Sorry if somebody else already touched on this as I just didn't feel like reading through all the posts.
I don't have the foggiest idea what Clayton is looking for in his next school but I could see him doing very well playing for Bob McKillop at Davidson. The guy is a freaking offensive genius and his system would be a lot of fun to play in for a point guard that can shoot. If Wake Forrest is in play as someone else mentioned then Davidson wouldn't be much different geographically.
Again, nothing more than wild speculation on my part, but if he liked Hoiball then this might be worth his time to check into.
Ware is not a valid comparison as his injury, as with Niang, was a broken bone. Not all injuries/surgeries/rehabs are equivalent. Broken bones heal very well.
Recovery from shoulder tightening surgery is generally 1-4 weeks:
http://my.clevelandclinic.org/servi...logy/diseases-conditions/shoulder-instability
From his statements post-surgery, sounds like he won't have any issues and should be ready to go full contact by April:
http://iowastate.scout.com/story/1479055-darien-williams-signs-with-iowa-state
Hallice should be ready to play around June, assuming no complications:
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bas...e-cooke-iowa-state-cyclones-set-hip-surgeries
http://www.methodistorthopedics.com/labral-tears-of-the-hip
You mean that offense that got destroyed by the Iowa frickin Hawkeyes?
But he flat said he's not even thinking about it this year, he will look at it and decide after next year. No reason to not believe him on that.
The woman in this photo knows a thing or two about basketball and I'm pretty sure she has primary access to Monte' ear.
I agree with your assessment of Monte's game. However, the same perspective given by the staff in November 2012 on bringing in Morris was given when they brought in Cooke.
They loved both players' ability to play pg or with a pg. It may be hard to believe, but Morris brought in because he may be the pg of the future, and if not, would be able to play alongside the pg of the future.
Kane coming in is a perfect example of that.
Cooke could well be. But we invested a lot of time in recruiting Clayton - thought he had the makings of a winner. Something went south in this kids Iowa State career and I hope it does not happen too often in the future. Cooke is a transfer and could well be a God send; as a rabid fan I am sold on Hoiberg's use of transfers but, BUT it is only part of of being a successful program.I think the fact that Clayton is transferring is probably a very good indication that Cooke is healthy and will be playing some PG IMO.
Cooke could well be. But we invested a lot of time in recruiting Clayton - thought he had the makings of a winner. Something went south in this kids Iowa State career and I hope it does not happen too often in the future. Cooke is a transfer and could well be a God send; as a rabid fan I am sold on Hoiberg's use of transfers but, BUT it is only part of of being a successful program.
Kids transfer for a lot of reasons, it's not necessarily because something "went south".
Kids transfer for a lot of reasons, it's not necessarily because something "went south".
Exactly.
Someone touched on this earlier, but I'm pretty sure he has a girlfriend who goes to the U of Pittsburg.
So we spend years courting, evaluating, expending a scholarship and coaching a kid - investing - and then rationalize that they leave for lots of reasons? Those in good standing leave for FEW reasons and usually it has to do with amount current of potential of playing time. That is good and bad. Sure kids leave programs and it is cool but the less it happens the better; and, something had to go south otherwise they'd still be in with us.Kids transfer for a lot of reasons, it's not necessarily because something "went south".
Pittsburgh State or PITT?