While I agree with most here that Burger King is, in almost every way, complete garbage 95% of the time, I still have to vote Starbucks for a couple reasons.
1) Burger King's onion rings, while a prime contender for the Subway sandwich phenomenon (not really even being the thing they advertise anymore, but a new product entirely), are way better than they have any right to be, especially paired with their horseradish-heavy Zesty sauce. I prefer them over any other mass-produced fry or onion ring.
2) I considered Chick-fil-A because of their garbage political views and because I simply think the Popeye's chicken sandwich is about 100 times better (would never pay for Chick-fil-A, but have had it at work conferences), but I respect their right to be bigots and refuse to try to force my beliefs on them (if only they would do the same).
3) Starbucks coffee isn't very good. I'm not a coffee snob, but I don't really get it. It's just not very good and their teas are comparable to something you could get at Target for $2.99 per 900 bags and make at home.
1) Burger King's onion rings, while a prime contender for the Subway sandwich phenomenon (not really even being the thing they advertise anymore, but a new product entirely), are way better than they have any right to be, especially paired with their horseradish-heavy Zesty sauce. I prefer them over any other mass-produced fry or onion ring.
2) I considered Chick-fil-A because of their garbage political views and because I simply think the Popeye's chicken sandwich is about 100 times better (would never pay for Chick-fil-A, but have had it at work conferences), but I respect their right to be bigots and refuse to try to force my beliefs on them (if only they would do the same).
3) Starbucks coffee isn't very good. I'm not a coffee snob, but I don't really get it. It's just not very good and their teas are comparable to something you could get at Target for $2.99 per 900 bags and make at home.