I had never seen the spousal interview for every employee, management many times, but never for baseline workers.
I don't relate. That article describes some pretty invasive and icky stuff. But I don't have any sympathy for the people who agree to work there and later regretted it. Very naïve.
If you don't spend less than you make, there is no advice out there that will help you. Every solid piece of financial advice starts with a budget, that is what he preaches. I'm not a Ramsey fan, but he basically preaches following a budget and having short, intermediate, and long term goals (what his debt snow ball and his baby steps are). Those are the core of basically all financial planning. After those, things are much easier. What core principles would you say should be done instead of those?
Here is the thing whenever people bring up Ramsey his defenders always say he is simplistic for people incapable of intermediate financial literacy. Don’t listen to him on stuff if you are past that stage. This is a perfect example. Assuming they didn’t actually carry a balance who cares that they have it.The one lady who said they hid their credit card from them when her husband was hired, I gave no credence to. If you have any clue about Ramsey and you do that, you are starting out on horrible footings.
Again as I said the “good” parts of Ramsey are not complicated and just basic foundations of personal finance. I am not a fan of the snowball method. Debt stacking or the avalanche method are better. I also hate his stance on credit cards. Credit cards are tools that can be used for significant benefit. I never use cash unless I can’t use my credit card. It also helps as I have electronic records of my spending. I never carry a balance so it costs me nothing.
Here is the thing whenever people bring up Ramsey his defenders always say he is simplistic for people incapable of intermediate financial literacy. Don’t listen to him on stuff if you are past that stage. This is a perfect example. Assuming they didn’t actually carry a balance who cares that they have it.
I mean I don’t really disagree in that part and I don’t really feel sorry for them. That isn’t a defense of Ramsey though. That’s just blaming the victim of an abusive workplace.On the second part: you lied to your employer about one of their hiring rules. You may not agree with it, but it is their rule. Don't get a job from deceit then complain about it afterwards. It shows a tendency to dishonesty, plain and simple. I don't care if he says you have to be left handed to work there, don't say you are and then complain about it because you aren't.
Company policy against pre martial sex? Interviewing the spouse? How is that legal ?
Again as I said the “good” parts of Ramsey are not complicated and just basic foundations of personal finance. I am not a fan of the snowball method. Debt stacking or the avalanche method are better. I also hate his stance on credit cards. Credit cards are tools that can be used for significant benefit. I never use cash unless I can’t use my credit card. It also helps as I have electronic records of my spending. I never carry a balance so it costs me nothing.
Here is the thing whenever people bring up Ramsey his defenders always say he is simplistic for people incapable of intermediate financial literacy. Don’t listen to him on stuff if you are past that stage. This is a perfect example. Assuming they didn’t actually carry a balance who cares that they have it.
That brings up a good question, who is the victim in that one instance. Technicallly the person who got lied to was the victim, so in this situation Ramsey was the victim. It's like taking marriage vows and pledging to be faithful (which I'm sure Hogan did) and then not being faithful, the victim was Hogans wife. In this situation, it woud be like Hogan blaming his spouse. In full bluntness, I don't really care for Ramsey, but for a large percentage of the population, his stuff works.I mean I don’t really disagree in that part and I don’t really feel sorry for them. That isn’t a defense of Ramsey though. That’s just blaming the victim of an abusive workplace.
Is this a religious organization or a business?Didn't realize they had such strict employee conduct rules.
Something like Financial Peace University should be a required course for Congress.It isn’t like it’s some complex advice though.
Stop spending money you don’t have.
Right people on here are like "people knew what they were getting into when they decided to work there", that doesn't mean I can run a very transparent infant fight club as a business.Is this a religious organization or a business?
They would probably tell you both.Is this a religious organization or a business?
How much for ringside seats?Right people on here are like "people knew what they were getting into when they decided to work there", that doesn't mean I can run a very transparent infant fight club as a business.
You provide an infant and it's free. You know the rulesHow much for ringside seats?
Sounds something like a Jim Jones type organization prepunch line.They would probably tell you both.