In his interview CFH said that he was probably wrong to not have played Percy and Daniel more to give us a better chance in the game against bigger front courts.
Last night against Kansas, we didn't get into foul trouble, but we also played some pretty lame defense, and really gave up the easy bunny shots and dunks early on. This kept Melvin and Georges from really getting into foul trouble.
That brings me to my actual question. What is the deal with Gibson and Edozie? They seem to give us positive minutes when they are in, and as long as Gibson doesn't try to be all world, they both play their role pretty well.
Is it just that we were playing an NBA B League team and needed our best talent at all times? Or is it that those two really aren't there yet? Or is it something entirely different?
Randy Peterson, you have access to these media events, please ask about this.
Last night against Kansas, we didn't get into foul trouble, but we also played some pretty lame defense, and really gave up the easy bunny shots and dunks early on. This kept Melvin and Georges from really getting into foul trouble.
That brings me to my actual question. What is the deal with Gibson and Edozie? They seem to give us positive minutes when they are in, and as long as Gibson doesn't try to be all world, they both play their role pretty well.
Is it just that we were playing an NBA B League team and needed our best talent at all times? Or is it that those two really aren't there yet? Or is it something entirely different?
Randy Peterson, you have access to these media events, please ask about this.
Last edited: