First thing I got from the write-up was that two teams that moved from the B12 are doing better in the SEC than they were in the B12. Could this possibly be interpreted as an indication that the SEC prowess has been overblown? It may not be true, but it at least should have been noted as a topic for discussion.
A&M is better than the have been recently but they were one of the better teams in the big 12 when it first formed. Mizzou was a top 5 team for a few years in a row and playing for big 12 titles as well, IMO both have picked up right where they left off. Mizzou would have had a down year last year even if they were in the big 12.