Happy Gilmore 2

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,480
39,287
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
This was humorous but seemed like nothing but a vehicle to get as many celebrity cameos as possible in a feature length film. I don't think I will ever watch it again.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,304
7,181
113
My Playhouse
The amount of fun haters in here is absolutely crazy.

Imagine the original Happy Gilmore being portrayed by a 60 year old.

It would’ve been impossible to replicate the same dumb humor. In fact, they even made a play on it with his dream no longer being hot chicks and booze but now having medium size underwear.

It was designed just to be a good time and nostalgic and people are reacting like it had the final season of Game of Thrones expectations lol
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,740
63,810
113
Not exactly sure.
The amount of fun haters in here is absolutely crazy.

Imagine the original Happy Gilmore being portrayed by a 60 year old.

It would’ve been impossible to replicate the same dumb humor. In fact, they even made a play on it with his dream no longer being hot chicks and booze but now having medium size underwear.

It was designed just to be a good time and nostalgic and people are reacting like it had the final season of Game of Thrones expectations lol
If it’s not on par with citizen cane, it’s pre crap. :jimlad:
 

CySmurf

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2011
4,821
6,436
113
The whole family watched it and laughed. I doubt I'll remember this movie exists in a couple years, but it was fun. It's a good example of why I think comedies should always be 90 mins.

Zalatoris being the caddie kid from the first movie was the best joke of the movie.
Wouldn't Zalatoris be like 45 years old now if he was 15 years old 30 years ago?
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,363
55,275
113
His kids performances weren't the issue (although his wife is just a terrible actress). The issue is he had to write characters for them, so all the sudden we had a daughter that needed a dance school and an AA plot that went absolutely nowhere and added nothing to the story.

A story of Shooter still being the top dog and Happy leaving his job as a hockey coach to face Shooter one last time would of been a far better and more compelling story. And killing off Virginia...just why? Well, because he had to shoe horn his daughters story lines in there somehow. The guy cares more about getting his friends and family in a movie than the actual movie itself. Its just terrible.

This has been the case for about his entire movie making career.

I don't know why it's a problem now, especially for a sequel to a movie from 30 years ago that was not much more than Billy Madison on a golf course.
 
Last edited:

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,795
31,167
113
Behind you
The amount of fun haters in here is absolutely crazy.

Imagine the original Happy Gilmore being portrayed by a 60 year old.

It would’ve been impossible to replicate the same dumb humor. In fact, they even made a play on it with his dream no longer being hot chicks and booze but now having medium size underwear.

It was designed just to be a good time and nostalgic and people are reacting like it had the final season of Game of Thrones expectations lol
It wasn't funny. Sorry. It's like Jerry Lewis and Dean Martin making a sequel to one of their movies from the 1960s using the same type of humor/comedy/bits/etc. from back then but trying to pull it off to a 1990s audience and expecting the same laughs.

The original Happy Gilmore was brilliant. This one was just kind of lazy and unfunny because 30 years later the same old jokes don't hit the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,363
55,275
113
It wasn't funny. Sorry. It's like Jerry Lewis and Dean Martin making a sequel to one of their movies from the 1960s using the same type of humor/comedy/bits/etc. from back then but trying to pull it off to a 1990s audience and expecting the same laughs.

The original Happy Gilmore was brilliant. This one was just kind of lazy and unfunny because 30 years later the same old jokes don't hit the same.

Repeating (again) but the Sandler type humor started losing that 'edge' around The Waterboy.

I never understood the love for Big Daddy in that way.
 

SolterraCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
2,425
3,341
113
38
I thought Zohan was actually not that different than Waterboy but a lot of them were bad like Chuck and Larry or that remote control thing. I’m not saying Zohan is The Godfather or When Harry Met Sally but it’s in the ballpark of his stupid yet beloved movies yet nobody tends to agree w me on that.

Him swimming in Zohan is one of the biggest laughs I’ve gotten from any movie. Pretty much everything with Tuturro in that movie is hilarious too.

The Wedding Singer to me is the only movie of his that’s both that sstupid/funny yet also a “good” movie in terms of what a film critic looks for.
In addition to TWS, I thought Big Daddy was a good, touching movie that also still had the 90s Sandler slapstick comedy elements.
 

NickTheGreat

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 17, 2012
10,805
4,774
113
Central Iowa
We watched this last night and I really liked it. But then again., the first one is one of my favorite movies.

If you didn't like #1, you aren't going to like #2.
 

Letterkenny

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 26, 2023
1,797
3,652
113
I watched it last night and liked it. Not the best comedy of all time, but it was good.

I feel like people who don't like it either didn't like the first one, or have completely forgot what type of humor was in the first one, because they're basically the same. Some really funny stuff, and some really corny not that funny stuff.

Chubb's son was the lowlight for me. Added nothing. I actually thought his daughters were pretty good.
 

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,906
11,983
113
36
Dubuque
Read over the wkd that Sandler had written a script before Carl Weathers died and when Carl died he had to rewrite the whole movie. I guess Chubs was a major character in the original script. Def a bummer, because I'd guess that was a MUCH better script than what we got.

I'm just bummed because this had so much potential yet Sandler went in about the worst direction with it. Also, shoe horning all his kids in it made it terrible.
I don't have a problem with his kids being in his movies. His younger daughter especially seems pretty talented. He's done this for years with his closest buddies, why not his family now that they're of age? His real life wife was also the dance instructor if I'm not mistaken.
 

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,906
11,983
113
36
Dubuque
I watched it last night and liked it. Not the best comedy of all time, but it was good.

I feel like people who don't like it either didn't like the first one, or have completely forgot what type of humor was in the first one, because they're basically the same. Some really funny stuff, and some really corny not that funny stuff.

Chubb's son was the lowlight for me. Added nothing. I actually thought his daughters were pretty good.
Chubbs son was fine. Boban Marjanovic as new Mr Larson was a bit more of a miss for me.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: drmwevr08

FarminCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 14, 2009
4,679
2,993
113
Nowhere and Everywhere
It was entertaining and what to expect from Sandler at this point (minus Uncut Gems).

I’ll agree with others that the whole Maxi Golf ending killed it for me. I laughed at a lot (especially John Daly and Buscemi) but the ending was just so random and out there that it missed what made the first movie so good.
 

CHim

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 20, 2006
1,214
424
83
Chubbs son was fine. Boban Marjanovic as new Mr Larson was a bit more of a miss for me.
I like Boban so that part was a highlight for me. But going the opposite direction also would have been funny.

It was entertaining. Not a good movie by any stretch but it was entertaining. I thought the pro golfers did as well as you could hope trying acting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyinthenorth

CycloneRulzzz

Gameday Guru
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 13, 2008
53,827
79,119
113
44
Nevada, IA
I don't have a problem with his kids being in his movies. His younger daughter especially seems pretty talented. He's done this for years with his closest buddies, why not his family now that they're of age? His real life wife was also the dance instructor if I'm not mistaken.

Correct. I mean when you see the scene of instructor and daughter together even if you didn't know, the family resemblance is obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyinthenorth

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron