Hoiberg to Transfer to Iowa State???

RezClone

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2013
4,734
7,493
113
Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, SD
I deleted that because I was afraid it would be misinterpreted. That wasn't meant as a shot at him in any way; he is who he is. I just meant that he never looked that comfortable or relaxed as the public face of the program. Like he didn't want the attention.

And I say that as someone who had direct experience with the public-facing role of his job. He just never looked like he enjoyed that part at all, and for better or worse it comes with the gig.
Georges was the face of the program. Naz was the Vice President.

I'm only half joking.
 

Mr.G.Spot

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 22, 2020
5,782
149
113
60
It seems strange that Greg McDermott had no success at ISU. He was considered a rising coaching star at UNI when ISU hired him. Creighton wanted to hire McDermott despite his record at ISU and he went on to be very successful there. Why couldn't he enjoy success at ISU? Was Big 12 basketball too tough for McDermott?
He ran his old offense that he did at uni. It's not complicated. Basketball changed and he didn't. He changed to the new way at Creighton. The rest is history.
 

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,581
66,682
113
Colorado
To me, more than anything else the McDermott era was so boring. There was a hard floor and a hard ceiling and it was just pure mediocrity every single year. There were inarguably higher highs under Prohm but man, stop and think about where the program would have gone had he not been fired and you get the willies. It was somehow going to get worse!

It seems forgotten that McD was slated to come back for 2010-11 until Creighton came calling. After underachieving with Brackens, Gilstrap, Hamilton and Co., who all left after 2010. It wasn’t setting up to be pretty…
 

ClonesTwenty1

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2018
17,927
21,886
113
It seems forgotten that McD was slated to come back for 2010-11 until Creighton came calling. After underachieving with Brackens, Gilstrap, Hamilton and Co., who all left after 2010. It wasn’t setting up to be pretty…
That Brackens, Gilstrap and Hamilton team should have been NIT at worst. I really have no idea how McDermott didn’t succeed here, but at the end of the day I’m glad we eventually got Hoiberg and TJ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dormeezy

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,979
41,724
113
Waukee
That Brackens, Gilstrap and Hamilton team should have been NIT at worst. I really have no idea how McDermott didn’t succeed here, but at the end of the day I’m glad we eventually got Hoiberg and TJ.

That team had three future NBA players plus Gilstrap, a very good JUCO transfer.

How the floor for that isn't AT LEAST an NCAA tournament evades me.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ankency

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,391
39,496
113
Prohm was a crappy coach who could usually recruit well enough to overcome his coaching. ISU had so much talent some of those years and did so mediocre.

I sort of agree. But he achieved what every other “good” coach has here.
 

Pat

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2011
2,411
3,543
113
That team had three future NBA players plus Gilstrap, a very good JUCO transfer.

How the floor for that isn't AT LEAST an NCAA tournament evades me.

Top-heavy roster, injuries, dubious point-guard play, and LaRon Dendy all factored prominently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aauummm

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,413
55,331
113
I sort of agree. But he achieved what every other “good” coach has here.

Repeating but imo he actually had ISU playing as good of overall basketball (both ends, team ball, etc.) as I'd seen in a long time with his first two teams at the end of the seasons.

There were also some weird losses and situations that called for a quicker action to make changes or planning that were red flags for. Like it seemed like he catered to other teams' strengths instead of trying to make THEM do the adjusting.

There were several times we heard 'yeah we should have done that earlier' after a loss or several losses when it was painfully obvious the simple solution was doing that thing to start with.

And I'm not convinced players knew where they stood which trickled down to dynamic issues. Sometimes that disconnect happens with the best of coaches but it seemed to be a common deal.

Water under the bridge and I'd guess being back in Murray, KY is a great deal for him.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: aauummm and Pat

MJ271

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 9, 2012
2,130
2,763
113
Atkins
I sort of agree. But he achieved what every other “good” coach has here.
This is where I'm at. Yes, the end of Prohm's time at Iowa State was as bad as it gets. But six years with 3 NCAA tournaments and a Sweet Sixteen is still in line with most other coaches of the modern era at Iowa State. McDermott didn't make any tournaments, Morgan was 1/3, Eustachy (though he had the ultimate peak of success) was 2/5, and Orr was 6/14 (6/10 in the 64-team tournament).

The obvious response is that Prohm only made it 3/6 years because of the talent that Hoiberg left. Sure, that's largely true, but the coach still has to get them there. There's an interesting comparison with McDermott. In each of the years he was at Iowa State, McDermott had at least 2 players who had a cup of coffee in the NBA (and in his last three years, he had 3 such players). Despite that level of talent, he never made the tournament and never even went .500. In comparison, every season that Prohm had at least 2 such players, he made the NCAA tournament.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,600
23,497
10,030
This is where I'm at. Yes, the end of Prohm's time at Iowa State was as bad as it gets. But six years with 3 NCAA tournaments and a Sweet Sixteen is still in line with most other coaches of the modern era at Iowa State. McDermott didn't make any tournaments, Morgan was 1/3, Eustachy (though he had the ultimate peak of success) was 2/5, and Orr was 6/14 (6/10 in the 64-team tournament).

The obvious response is that Prohm only made it 3/6 years because of the talent that Hoiberg left. Sure, that's largely true, but the coach still has to get them there. There's an interesting comparison with McDermott. In each of the years he was at Iowa State, McDermott had at least 2 players who had a cup of coffee in the NBA (and in his last three years, he had 3 such players). Despite that level of talent, he never made the tournament and never even went .500. In comparison, every season that Prohm had at least 2 such players, he made the NCAA tournament.
The takeaway is that despite having some of the best rosters in the Big 12 during several of those years, Iowa State severely underperformed under several coaches. McDermott had some great players and didn't even get to the Big Dance. Hoiberg and Prohm both had elite talent.

TJ got scrubs to the Sweet Sixteen. Here's to the future!
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,780
13,417
113
Prohm inherited a very talented roster. I think 6 guys made the NBA. Thomas, Long, Niang, Morris, Burton, Abdel Nader. Think about that guys, 6 NBA players!!!!! They finished 5th in the Big 12. I like watching them and was happy with the team, but when I went to Chicago and watch them in the sweet 16 (there was an upset in the first round so we caught a break in the second round)I couldn't believe how unprepared they were. Complete lack of a game plan, came out with dear in the headlights and got behind big. Prohm didn't not have them ready to play. That is when I first started to question if he was a good coach or not. Not being prepared to play and game plan in the NCAAs happened again Purdue the next year and Ohio State in 2019. We had no business losing to Ohio State, we should have ran them off the floor.
The takeaway is that despite having some of the best rosters in the Big 12 during several of those years, Iowa State severely underperformed under several coaches. McDermott had some great players and didn't even get to the Big Dance. Hoiberg and Prohm both had elite talent.

TJ got scrubs to the Sweet Sixteen. Here's to the future!
As painful as it was, at times, under McDermott and Prohm, we got our man after each. Indeed, here's to the future!
 

clone52

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2006
8,329
4,468
113
Top-heavy roster, injuries, dubious point-guard play, and LaRon Dendy all factored prominently.

I think you're a little off here.
You had Diante Garrett as a Junior PG. If any of his play was dubious, I'd argue it was because of the scheme.
You had Brackins who was a stud.
You had Gilstrap was was awfully good.
You had Justin Hamilton who ended up having a nice career
You had a 43% three point shooter in Christopherson.

The only injury to speak of was Lucca Staiger. and I guess Jamie Vanderbeeken who wasn't playing a ton.

I guess the top heavy roster makes sense. You had an really good starting lineup, but bench depth was weak. If Staiger and Vanderbeeken had stayed healthy, then maybe you'd have a solid 7 man rotation.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Pat and Sigmapolis

Pat

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2011
2,411
3,543
113
I think you're a little off here.
You had Diante Garrett as a Junior PG. If any of his play was dubious, I'd argue it was because of the scheme.
You had Brackins who was a stud.
You had Gilstrap was was awfully good.
You had Justin Hamilton who ended up having a nice career
You had a 43% three point shooter in Christopherson.

The only injury to speak of was Lucca Staiger. and I guess Jamie Vanderbeeken who wasn't playing a ton.

I guess the top heavy roster makes sense. You had an really good starting lineup, but bench depth was weak. If Staiger and Vanderbeeken had stayed healthy, then maybe you'd have a solid 7 man rotation.

My bad on Garrett, though his role/impact changed wildly his senior year. My memory of that season is 1) McDermott suspending Colvin, then un-suspending him early because they were running out of warm bodies, 2) feeling really bad for Brackins, who probably cost himself millions of dollars by coming back, and 3) Dendy single-handedly costing us the UNI game by hoisting an terrible shot instead of holding the ball, while all of Hilton screamed “No!” in unison. Good times.
 

CtownCyclone

Flirtin' with Disaster
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 20, 2010
16,843
9,146
113
Where they love the governor
I think you're a little off here.
You had Diante Garrett as a Junior PG. If any of his play was dubious, I'd argue it was because of the scheme.
You had Brackins who was a stud.
You had Gilstrap was was awfully good.
You had Justin Hamilton who ended up having a nice career
You had a 43% three point shooter in Christopherson.

The only injury to speak of was Lucca Staiger. and I guess Jamie Vanderbeeken who wasn't playing a ton.

I guess the top heavy roster makes sense. You had an really good starting lineup, but bench depth was weak. If Staiger and Vanderbeeken had stayed healthy, then maybe you'd have a solid 7 man rotation.

I recall that Hoiberg said something about DG being able to average like 16 ppg when he was hired. This board had a field day about how out of touch Fred was.

That season, DG averaged more than 17 a game after only being a 9 a game guy.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pat and Sigmapolis

clone52

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2006
8,329
4,468
113
My bad on Garrett, though his role/impact changed wildly his senior year. My memory of that season is 1) McDermott suspending Colvin, then un-suspending him early because they were running out of warm bodies, 2) feeling really bad for Brackins, who probably cost himself millions of dollars by coming back, and 3) Dendy single-handedly costing us the UNI game by hoisting an terrible shot instead of holding the ball, while all of Hilton screamed “No!” in unison. Good times.

Think of how much money could have earned had he played 1 year for Hoiberg.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,979
41,724
113
Waukee
I recall that Hoiberg said something about DG being able to average like 16 ppg when he was hired. This board had a field day about how out of touch Fred was.

That season, DG averaged more than 17 a game after only being a 9 a game guy.

I remember early in that first Hoiberg season watching Diante turn into an entirely different player than the one under McDermott. The offense was 90% giving Diante the ball, setting a high screen for him, and letting him use his quickness to break down the defense, which usually ended in Garrett finishing at the rim in some creative fashion, a pick'n'pop back out to JVB, or a pass to Thug Life for a corner three.

During the non-con one time, I remember a play that happened right in front of me where Diante blew by the guy guarding him, split between two help defenders with a nasty crossover at full speed, and then a pretty finish at the rim with a reverse layup to stifle the shot blocker. Yes, it was against Three Blind Mice State, but he never showed that sort of quickness or creativity under the McDermott scheme.

I remember yelling out, "Where the hell was this the past three years!?!?"

@Alswelk replies, astutely and pithily, "McDermott told him not to."

McDermott had a dynamic scoring-PG on the roster with low-end NBA talent. He just didn't use him right.
 
Last edited:

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,979
41,724
113
Waukee
Brackins was still a mid first round pick. For one reason or another, his game just didn't translate.

Where was he projected had he come out as a sophomore?

And how was the salary structure for draft picks setup then in terms of guaranteed money?

I thought his game would translate well to the NBA -- but guys bust all the time.

He just happened to be one of them. He's had a nice overseas career, though.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron