IOWA vs IOWA STATE

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,922
12,722
113
Could we start a separate thread for the student section BS? In the end, who really gives a eff? If he's a d-bag I'm guessing he'll be made to feel uncomfortable.
 

CynadoAlley

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2010
2,462
79
48
Siouxland
Some analysis.. Control Marble, get back in transition, and have a normal shooting night = Cyclones win by 10. I've watched Iowa quite a bit so far this season (family are Hawk fans), and their lack of a halfcourt offense is a killer. If they can't get out and run (we need to be smart with the ball) then they rely far too much on Marble to create offense.

Also, their defense has kind of surprised me this season. After seeing what Sherman from ND did to them, Melvin and George shouldn't have much problem. They can't really go to a zone either as we have too many shooters. I'm really interested to see what Mad Fran does defensively to open the game. I can't wait to see if they put Gesell on Kane, if they do we'll see him posting up all night. If they put Marble on Kane to prevent it, that opens up our other wings.

Lets say Iowa starts Gesell, Marble, White, Basabe, and Woodbury. How do we match-up defensively? Thomas on Gesell, Kane on Marble, Hogue on White, Mel on Basabe, and Georges on Woodbury? Then Naz or Hogue taking Marble. Monte and Thomas taking care of either Gesell or Clemmons. Georges, Mel, and Hogue handling any of Woodbury, McCabe, Basabe, Uthof (no idea on spelling) etc. I really like how well we match-up.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
If the guy is willing to sit in the student section, surrounded by rabid ISU fans, that's his problem not ours.
 

Cyclonesince78

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2012
14,395
244
63
If he wears a hawk shirt in the student section then he's a dbag and should be treated as such. If he goes neutral clothing, I guess no biggie since he's with his friends.
 

RoseBowlBound

Member
Sep 13, 2011
595
4
18
Iowa City via WDM
Some analysis.. Control Marble, get back in transition, and have a normal shooting night = Cyclones win by 10. I've watched Iowa quite a bit so far this season (family are Hawk fans), and their lack of a halfcourt offense is a killer. If they can't get out and run (we need to be smart with the ball) then they rely far too much on Marble to create offense.

Also, their defense has kind of surprised me this season. After seeing what Sherman from ND did to them, Melvin and George shouldn't have much problem. They can't really go to a zone either as we have too many shooters. I'm really interested to see what Mad Fran does defensively to open the game. I can't wait to see if they put Gesell on Kane, if they do we'll see him posting up all night. If they put Marble on Kane to prevent it, that opens up our other wings.

Lets say Iowa starts Gesell, Marble, White, Basabe, and Woodbury. How do we match-up defensively? Thomas on Gesell, Kane on Marble, Hogue on White, Mel on Basabe, and Georges on Woodbury? Then Naz or Hogue taking Marble. Monte and Thomas taking care of either Gesell or Clemmons. Georges, Mel, and Hogue handling any of Woodbury, McCabe, Basabe, Uthof (no idea on spelling) etc. I really like how well we match-up.
I agree for the most part but the defense has been pretty good, save second half of game 3 in three days of tourney where Nova was white hot, and game 2 days later where they were obviously running on E.
 

Clones32

Member
Mar 5, 2013
270
98
18
30
Some analysis.. Control Marble, get back in transition, and have a normal shooting night = Cyclones win by 10. I've watched Iowa quite a bit so far this season (family are Hawk fans), and their lack of a halfcourt offense is a killer. If they can't get out and run (we need to be smart with the ball) then they rely far too much on Marble to create offense.

Also, their defense has kind of surprised me this season. After seeing what Sherman from ND did to them, Melvin and George shouldn't have much problem. They can't really go to a zone either as we have too many shooters. I'm really interested to see what Mad Fran does defensively to open the game. I can't wait to see if they put Gesell on Kane, if they do we'll see him posting up all night. If they put Marble on Kane to prevent it, that opens up our other wings.

Lets say Iowa starts Gesell, Marble, White, Basabe, and Woodbury. How do we match-up defensively? Thomas on Gesell, Kane on Marble, Hogue on White, Mel on Basabe, and Georges on Woodbury? Then Naz or Hogue taking Marble. Monte and Thomas taking care of either Gesell or Clemmons. Georges, Mel, and Hogue handling any of Woodbury, McCabe, Basabe, Uthof (no idea on spelling) etc. I really like how well we match-up.
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.
 

RoseBowlBound

Member
Sep 13, 2011
595
4
18
Iowa City via WDM
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.
I hadn't thought about the teams Iowa has played compared to ISU but it's a fair comparison. Hopefully Fran made some adjustments because if the D plays like they did against Nova and ND, Iowa is going to lose by 15+.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.

Huh? You realize Hoiball makes teams play small right...we don't match up against teams, they match up against us.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.

Keep in mind they lost Villanova and played a very tight ball game with ND (at home). Also, we are way better than ND because our front court is far more dynamic. Remember last year when they tried to go small against us (ND)?

I expect this game will be Niang's coming out party this year. He's been fairly low key, playing really well in crunch time against Michigan and BYU, but I see him lighting up Iowa for some reason.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,922
12,722
113
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.

I'm not worried about getting worn down in the least. Foul trouble is my primary concern. If we stay out of foul trouble I'm not particularly concerned. I do think we'll have to deal with it so it will be nailbiting. This game is an interesting matchup and i can't be 100% sure who has the advantage. Hilton is the difference.
 

MartyFine

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2009
15,293
24,308
113
Warren Co., IA
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.

43599193.jpg
 

jkclone

Well-Known Member
Bookie
Jan 21, 2013
5,834
2,360
83
Urbandale
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.
Their quality depth is made up. I don't get why people think they are much better with depth. Yes they have depth but so do we. Only person that has a chance to play that worried me is KJ but even if he plays I think he plays ok. Remember when he does play he is one of the only scoters and he also is trying to prove himself. That makes him press to much and take bad shots. If he would have to play I look for him to play well.
 

Clones32

Member
Mar 5, 2013
270
98
18
30
Their quality depth is made up. I don't get why people think they are much better with depth. Yes they have depth but so do we. Only person that has a chance to play that worried me is KJ but even if he plays I think he plays ok. Remember when he does play he is one of the only scoters and he also is trying to prove himself. That makes him press to much and take bad shots. If he would have to play I look for him to play well.
No it's not. When we played Michigan and BYU only 7 players played 10 or more minuets. When Iowa played Xavier, Villanova, and Notre Dame they had 9 players play 10 or more minuets. I'm not saying we don't have depth, I'm saying that we don't have quality depth. I hope that people like Edozie, KJ, and Gibson don't play because that means that we are probably winning.
 

cyrocksmypants

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2008
91,284
89,027
113
Washington DC
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.

Are you serious? Our depth may not be as experienced, but in terms of talent it's at least equal to Iowa's. And our starting 5 is better than theirs. As long as our youngsters play above their age, which they have most of this season already, depth isn't a concern for ISU.
 

carvers4math

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2012
21,353
17,736
113
If he wears a hawk shirt in the student section then he's a dbag and should be treated as such. If he goes neutral clothing, I guess no biggie since he's with his friends.

Comes here bragging about getting a cheap ticket in student section and ability to sit in front since he attends VodkaU and has no classes on Friday. Dbag determination made.
 

MartyFine

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2009
15,293
24,308
113
Warren Co., IA
No it's not. When we played Michigan and BYU only 7 players played 10 or more minuets. When Iowa played Xavier, Villanova, and Notre Dame they had 9 players play 10 or more minuets. I'm not saying we don't have depth, I'm saying that we don't have quality depth. I hope that people like Edozie, KJ, and Gibson don't play because that means that we are probably winning.

Edozie and SDW are clearly capable of playing more than 10 minutes of quality basketball. Edozie made the play of the game against BYU.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,370
47,073
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
No it's not. When we played Michigan and BYU only 7 players played 10 or more minuets. When Iowa played Xavier, Villanova, and Notre Dame they had 9 players play 10 or more minuets. I'm not saying we don't have depth, I'm saying that we don't have quality depth. I hope that people like Edozie, KJ, and Gibson don't play because that means that we are probably winning.

That doesn't mean we don't have quality depth. And it certainly doesn't mean Iowa has quality depth.

All it really means is that the coaches differ on playing rotation philosophies. Fred plays a 7-man rotation. Fran plays a 9 or 10 man rotation.

I truly think if Fran were coaching this ISU team (*shudder*) he'd play a 10 man rotation with SDW, Edozie and Gibson all getting at least 12 minutes a game.

And if Fred were coaching that Iowa team, he'd play a 8-man rotation (Gessell, Marble, White, Basabe and Olaseni starting, with McCabe, Clemmons and Uthoff off the bench)
 

Clones32

Member
Mar 5, 2013
270
98
18
30
Edozie and SDW are clearly capable of playing more than 10 minutes of quality basketball. Edozie made the play of the game against BYU.
SDW didn't even play against Michigan or BYU and Edozie didn't play against Michigan and only 7 minutes against BYU, but yes he made a good play at the end of the game. So no they aren't clearly capable of playing more than 10 minuets of quality basketball against a quality team.
 

ribsnwhiskey

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 6, 2009
9,075
4,303
113
80246
I don't like how we match up. Their size/length in the front court scares the hell out of me. We haven't played a team like that all year while Iowa has played 2 teams similar to us. Villanova and Notre Dame are similar to us(smaller lineup with a lot of guards that like to shoot 3's). Iowa is like a hockey team with how they sub and that wears down opponents. Not only do they have depth, but they have quality depth unlike us. I think we win, but by 5 max.

BYU had 3 guys 6'10 and up. Didn't seem to matter. We out athlete the hell out of them. And I haven't seen a team this tough since 1999-2001. I think you're just looking for reasons to be worried.