They only allowed 65 pts. 2 good Sr guards scored 48. The D was good enough to win. I agree on the Offense we need 2 more shoters. Wes not 100% hurts too, it looks like it takes him a bit to get losened up.
ISU vs. CU postgame thread
- Thread starter ISUFan22
- Start date
They only allowed 65 pts. 2 good Sr guards scored 48. The D was good enough to win. I agree on the Offense we need 2 more shoters. Wes not 100% hurts too, it looks like it takes him a bit to get losened up.
Lack of good depth may have something to do with that. I am suprised we didnt see CJ and Boozer more in the 2nd half. They did a nice job when they were in.
Our d against Kansas and today was good, but we need great d to win games with our scoring avg. and we haven't gotten it lately.
I disagree with this. We let the worst team in the conference shoot 55% against us. With this team, allowing the other team to shoot 55% is never good enough to win. If we were to win a game like that, that would be winning despite our defense.
Ridiculously hard to figure out McD's substituting pattern. Always has been. I would have liked to see them get spot minutes as well in the 2nd Half. They sure couldn't do much worse than the other guys that were playing.
I have not seen a worse college team in many years. No shooters, can't pass questionable defense or at least inconsistent. When man out front is throwing to someone, it is always so close to being intercepted--if the defense was awake most should be intercepted. Don't see much hope for next hear. Going to take 2-3 more years to get anywhere like NIT even. My wife got no argument to turn over to the girls state tournament.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQdAIlQL-kQ]YouTube - Kevin Borseth Rant Michigan Coach[/ame]
The D wasnt good but when you hold a team to 65 pts you should win more often than not.
LOL...you are just now learning this? I prefer to say we are below average, but have lots of potential:biggrin:
