ISU/WVU post game thread

Tornado man

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2007
11,913
-539
113
63
Ames, IA
Yes they can. This is a tough team to get ready for on short notice. If you are a team that has never played ISU, that would make it even harder.
Sure, we're tough to get ready for with regard to how to defend us. But any coach playing us will say to his squad, "we're going to get lots of offensive rebounds, put-backs, and lots of points because we play harder than they do."
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,602
23,497
10,030
People that are either surprised by the loss or blame the season on Prohm are just delusional. This is the same team we've had for several years minus our strongest leader sidelined by injury, a bipolar starter, and 2 role players in Cooke and Ashton that wouldn't play a minute for OU, KU, or even Iowa.

Considering the fact that Hoiberg gave Prohm probably the weakest bench in the top 7 of the league, I'd say we are sitting right about where we should be. We don't have players with the defensive skillset to keep games where we need them despite scoring above our potential with basically 3 legit scorers. Even though Nader is playing great O, his 20+ pts don't offset the 40 pts he gives up each game.

Prohm is coaching the **** out of these guys, but that only does so much. Had Fred been all-in the past two years with recruiting and coaching, we'd be in a much better position. Yes, it feels like wasted potential, but that blame shouldn't reside solely on the characters currently on the roster and staff, in fact I'd say very little of it does. The players are who they are and the coaches are doing the best job given the team makeup.
 

isufbcurt

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2006
27,550
44,523
113
46
Newton
hmmm...reminds me of his predecessor's demeanor

Exactly!!

I sure hope the people complaining about Prohm's demeanor on the sidelines ******* about their hero Hoiberg too because all he did was stand there with his arms up.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,618
12,056
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
Would you rather be up 10 with 5 mins left and all of our starters in the 33-35 minute range, or down 10 with 5 mins left and most our starters under 30 mins?
 

Klubber

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
1,783
2,101
113
Aurora, IL
Like it or hate it, Prohm is never going to get too aggressive with the refs. If you remember when Prohm was hired, JP said that he went to refs to ask them to recommend well behaved coaches.

Today was as close to working the refs as you're going to see from Prohm.

Wow. If true, that is astounding. Why on earth would an AD who claimed there was a Big XII officiating conspiracy against ISU ask for coaching recommendations from officials? I seriously would believe this though, seeing how Pollard puts so much importance on things not related to actual coaching during the hiring process...
 

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
12,491
10,806
113
Des Moines
Exactly!!

I sure hope the people complaining about Prohm's demeanor on the sidelines ******* about their hero Hoiberg too because all he did was stand there with his arms up.

Hoiberg at least knew when to stick up for his players. The technical in the Big 12 championship game against Kansas comes to mind. Nothing wrong with Prohm getting a T in the right situation. The best coaches like Izzo and Self are the masters of the strategically placed T.
 

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,807
3,698
113
Menlo, Iowa
Exactly!!

I sure hope the people complaining about Prohm's demeanor on the sidelines ******* about their hero Hoiberg too because all he did was stand there with his arms up.


You are wrong. Prohm works the refs harder that Fred every did.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,602
23,497
10,030
Prohm needs to trust the bench and give either Cooke or Ashton 5-10 more minutes. We can't play 6 guys the rest of the year, no way. Cooke has paid his dues and his upside is a lot more than Ashton's I think you have to play him and see what he can give you at this point. We need him to give Morris a break 5-10 each game. He's shown previously he can run the point.

Neither of those 2 would even sniff the court for a top 10 team, period. Both have a minute or two of potential mixed in with practice squad caliber play. The fact that they are our best options off the bench tells you how non existent our bench is. Not to pick on our own players as I hate that more than anything, but let's be honest and say they are not Big 12 level backups right now. I love how it's always the coach doing a ****** job because he isn't playing the scrubs and people can't figure out why. I've seen them in practice, there is a reason they don't play more even with no other options.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,052
21,037
113
Wow - these "liabilities" you refer to - what exactly are they? Let me sum it up: effort. Teams know that we do not have the intensity - or interest - on defense that we do on offense. "Talent" - would apply to both ends of the floor, not just on the O...
I don't really think its a terrible lack of effort on defense, I think it's lack of defensive talent. Georges lacks in every measurable that matters on defense. McKay is rail thin and lacks strength. Burton is 6'4 trying to guard post players. Top it off with 38 mins per game for most of them, so they are gassed. I think it's really simplistic to equate effort equaling good defense. These guys do not look like they have been well coached on defense during their careers. Often it's over rotating, engaging/ leaving a double team at the wrong time, mix-ups on pick and roll. Not really lack of effort but just lack of know-how.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
People that are either surprised by the loss or blame the season on Prohm are just delusional. This is the same team we've had for several years minus our strongest leader sidelined by injury, a bipolar starter, and 2 role players in Cooke and Ashton that wouldn't play a minute for OU, KU, or even Iowa.

Considering the fact that Hoiberg gave Prohm probably the weakest bench in the top 7 of the league, I'd say we are sitting right about where we should be. We don't have players with the defensive skillset to keep games where we need them despite scoring above our potential with basically 3 legit scorers. Even though Nader is playing great O, his 20+ pts don't offset the 40 pts he gives up each game.

Prohm is coaching the **** out of these guys, but that only does so much. Had Fred been all-in the past two years with recruiting and coaching, we'd be in a much better position. Yes, it feels like wasted potential, but that blame shouldn't reside solely on the characters currently on the roster and staff, in fact I'd say very little of it does. The players are who they are and the coaches are doing the best job given the team makeup.

Ehh, there's enough blame to go around. Fred and the players included but I'm not ready to give Prohm a lifetime contract either. He looks like just another coach to me. Usually it takes more than that to win in a tough league like this.

We will see next year in the next two years when he has shaped the roster in his mold but I'm in wait and see mode on him.
 

BeneventiCy28

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2015
630
575
93
32
Granger
Refs. They bad. You're telling me ISU fouled more times than WVU? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

ISU rebounding. Just as bad.

Both games, one of the least fouling teams in the nation out fouled West Virginia. Let me say that again. BOTH AT WEST VIRGINIA AND AT HILTON COLISEUM, WE OUT FOUL A TEAM THAT FOULS MORE THAN ALMOST ANY TEAM IN THE NATION. Yes we could've done things better, but in absolutely no fathomable universe should that ever be remotely possible and it makes me sick that it is even realistic to think so.
 

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
12,491
10,806
113
Des Moines
Neither of those 2 would even sniff the court for a top 10 team, period. Both have a minute or two of potential mixed in with practice squad caliber play. The fact that they are our best options off the bench tells you how non existent our bench is. Not to pick on our own players as I hate that more than anything, but let's be honest and say they are not Big 12 level backups right now. I love how it's always the coach doing a ****** job because he isn't playing the scrubs and people can't figure out why. I've seen them in practice, there is a reason they don't play more even with no other options.

Good thing Fred cut players like SDW and Custer. Gibson also although he would be gone by now. We go from cutting guys like Amardi to having walk-ons coming off the bench in just a year.
 

Cycl1

Well-Known Member
Mar 14, 2012
8,506
1,890
113
38
North Liberty
People that are either surprised by the loss or blame the season on Prohm are just delusional. This is the same team we've had for several years minus our strongest leader sidelined by injury, a bipolar starter, and 2 role players in Cooke and Ashton that wouldn't play a minute for OU, KU, or even Iowa.

Considering the fact that Hoiberg gave Prohm probably the weakest bench in the top 7 of the league, I'd say we are sitting right about where we should be. We don't have players with the defensive skillset to keep games where we need them despite scoring above our potential with basically 3 legit scorers. Even though Nader is playing great O, his 20+ pts don't offset the 40 pts he gives up each game.

Prohm is coaching the **** out of these guys, but that only does so much. Had Fred been all-in the past two years with recruiting and coaching, we'd be in a much better position. Yes, it feels like wasted potential, but that blame shouldn't reside solely on the characters currently on the roster and staff, in fact I'd say very little of it does. The players are who they are and the coaches are doing the best job given the team makeup.
Best job...

Will likely have the worst big 12 record of any isu team in 5 years. Preseason top 10 to 6th best in the Big 12.
 

CyJack13

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2010
12,666
1,665
113
Neither of those 2 would even sniff the court for a top 10 team, period. Both have a minute or two of potential mixed in with practice squad caliber play. The fact that they are our best options off the bench tells you how non existent our bench is. Not to pick on our own players as I hate that more than anything, but let's be honest and say they are not Big 12 level backups right now. I love how it's always the coach doing a ****** job because he isn't playing the scrubs and people can't figure out why. I've seen them in practice, there is a reason they don't play more even with no other options.

Morris is playing over 40 min/game in conference play, you have to find a way to steal mins along the way. There are plenty of opportuniites to get Ashton or Cooke a min or two before a timeout to extend the rest for a starter.
 

CycloneDaddy

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2006
8,410
7,855
113
Johnston
Hoiberg at least knew when to stick up for his players. The technical in the Big 12 championship game against Kansas comes to mind. Nothing wrong with Prohm getting a T in the right situation. The best coaches like Izzo and Self are the masters of the strategically placed T.
1 T in his college coaching career and you are killing coach Prohm who hasn't even coached 1 year at Iowa State.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron