Didn't take long for the massive overreaction. 2nd post. Congrats.Yep, you are an expert. Fred sucks. Let's fire him. #sarcasm
Epic fail on your first post.
Didn't take long for the massive overreaction. 2nd post. Congrats.Yep, you are an expert. Fred sucks. Let's fire him. #sarcasm
Epic fail on your first post.
So if we would have gotten more rebounds, but made the same shots/amount of shots, and UAB made the same shots/amount of shots who wins the game?
And Uthoff is better at basketball than White.
Regarding Tempo: Iowa State averages the 17th most adjusted possessions per game by Pomeroy at 69.16....This game had 69 possessions.
Regarding defense: Critique whatever you want about getting around screens or boxing out or anything else but UAB score 0.87 ppp in the game. That is miniscule. ISU wins 99% of games where the opponent has a scoring efficiency anywhere near that low.
Whether it was just a bad shooting day or turnovers or UAB causing bad shots or contesting to force misses, the game was lost on offense.
That's all I have to say about that.
Getting more rebounds gives you more opportunities to score the ball which gives you more opportunities to put points on the boards and takes away those opportunities from the opponents. Therefore, if the Cyclones would have grabbed more rebounds they would have taken more shots and likely made more shots. UAB wouldn't have taken as many shots therefore they wouldn't have made as many shots. It's pretty basic.
No one is saying that the poor offensive performance didn't have an impact on the outcome of the game. I'm certainly not saying that. The poor rebounding effort did have an impact on the game as well and that is an area that Edozie may have been able to help in. The players who were on the court were getting outworked for the boards. Some of them can be chalked up as simply bad bounces, but when you get outrebounded like they did it's not all bad luck.
I find it ironic that some "experts" on here bash the OP for claiming to be an "expert" and say his post failed....the OP made some valid points...and nowhere did he say that Hoiberg should be gone or that he would prefer another coach.
Some people on here act like Hoiberg is infallible...he's not, he would readily admit that. He's been a coach for 5 seasons...5 seasons...he still has much to learn and makes plenty of mistakes, which is to be expected. I guarantee there are some things he would do different if he could replay the UAB game.
To do what he's done in 5 seasons is incredible...just wait until he gets some more "in-game" coaching experience and learns some more tough lessons. I think some people are blind to the fact that Hoiberg is still a work in progress when it comes to coaching because of the success he's had so quickly...so just think about that...finishing no worse than 4th in the conference the last 4 years (with two 3rds and a 2nd) and back-to-back Big 12 tourney championships from a coach that has 5 years of coaching experience and room to improve...imagine what he can do with a little more experience. And he's doing it against coaches that have 20-30+ years of head coaching experience.
Heck, even Haase had 12 years as assistant under Roy Williams before he got the UAB job three seasons ago...
All I'm saying is don't be so quick to bash people that critique the program or Hoiberg...it’s OK to do as long as it’s respectful and not full of hate. It doesn’t make someone less of a fan or a troll…maybe it was the OPs way of venting after a tough loss…and he did it in a much nicer way than many people did when they hated on BDJ.
I've now watched the game twice and read almost every single post about the UAB loss. I'm a longtime ISU fan going back to Barry Stevens. I don't live in Iowa anymore but a major metro city, so here is a little detached perspective. I love Fred and think he is a really good coach and could be great one day. I watched every single minute of every all but three games early in the season. However, this loss falls on him. I think the following points need to get made:
1. The team wasn't ready to play. This is on the coach. He has to make sure they are ready to go for the biggest stage of their careers.
2. Their problem was defense the entire year, especially the inability to get over screens. This never got fixed and cost them on the last UAB OB play. This is a coaching deficiency if it occurs over and over. Defense matters especially in the tournament.
3. Fred did nothing to adjust the tempo. You can press for steals and/or tempo. Fred never tried to push the pace with a deeper bench against a 19 win team.
4. They were getting killed on the boards and Edozie never got off the bench. 5-10 minutes of him knocking some people around might have helped. It's not enough to stay close against a UAB, he should have been upset they weren't destroying them making a statement.
5. At no time during the year did Fred ever really get on anyone. Last year he had Ejim and a 25 year old Kane to do it on the floor but not this year. He needs to know when to fill that hole. Calipari has multiple coddled McD AA and he said in an interview before halftime when they weren't playing well that either you perform or you sit. Players want to be challenged. Calm is great but everyone once in while you need to get in someone's grill.
6. Matt Thomas was playing well and sat in the 2nd half. If Long isn't hitting shots then he is liability on the floor because he can't cover anyone. Why not make a substitution? It's one and done. If your Thomas and you play when you aren't performing but sit when you are: what is the message?
7. It was a good season, but the tournament is what matters. If we want a nationally prominent program then you have to perform in the tourney.
If were an 8 seed and this happened, fine. We were a four against a team that had to win its conference tourney to even get into the dance. Fred had nearly a week to prepare. Jared Haase seemed to figure out. He called timeouts before TV timeouts, so ISU could never get into a rhythm. Nice coaching and I'm not saying he is better.
Go ahead lose your minds.
Up to this point, I'm not sure how you could say this wasn't his best year as a coach. He replaced two All-Big 12 players who combined to average about 35 points and 15 rebounds. Yes, last year he did a great job, but this year he actually improved the team's conference record and the team's road record, won another Big 12 tourney title, and finished better in the standings. Considering BDJ was a bit of a flop and we didn't bring in anyone else, I think this year was his best.
Uh oh... BDK is back...
Where was the team's swagger and toughness against UAB? The team showed no energy... no fire the entire game. Where was the team that was taunting the opposing teams fans in Iowa City? Where was the team that was talking trash against Kansas? Where was the team doing chest bumps at media timeouts and throwing down their ridiculous handshakes by the team huddle? They weren't in Louisville.
Where was the toughness on the boards? Outside of McKay there wasn't a single guy that wanted to get out there and physically dominate those UAB kids on the boards.
I watched parts of nearly every game this past weekend and heard the announcers telling stories about the teams and how they did things in the offseason to bond and build that toughness. Utah had a Navy Seal team leader put their kids through a version of hell week to build toughness. That guy kicked their *****. Carrying logs, ridiculous marches, sleep deprivation, etc... the whole nine yards. You don't see Utah being physically dominated on the boards. During an OU game they spoke about how during their entire preseason training all they worked on was defense. They were determined to improve their defense because offense was not an issue for them. Guess what team is still playing in the NCAA Tournament? Oklahoma. I'll be the first person to admit that I think Spangler from OU is a total d-bag. Why? He plays rough, he plays borderline dirty, he plays with an edge, and he doesn't care anyone likes it or not. In hindsight.... I sure would love to see some ISU players play with that toughness and physicality next season. These guys need to get tough!
Agree with one of the earlier posters regarding FH's job this year. We seem to have forgotten how good our two players were that we lost from last year.kane esp was a pretty incredible talent and my opinion is a real competitor.
I think this year it was difficult to fit all the pieces together. We certainly had in comming talent, esp McKay but a coach has to fit everything together. Remember, McKay came in late and we seemed to take a step back as he settled in. Also we had BDJ kind of doing a slow exit all year long and possibly affecting team focus all the while. Additionally, again IMO, I think GN was affected negatively by McKay. Even though we did not run much offense through him, I feel his presence in the middle hurt the spacing GN needs for his game.
Now that we are looking back at the season, I think most can see that we never were consistent, good sometimes, awful sometimes and incredible at others. We probably did as well as could be expected. We walked a tight rope between winning and losing most of the last half of the season (not falling many times).
Next year I am looking for better things and more consistancy. Hoping that our additions find their niche. Also hoping that we can keep the floors spaced better for both GN and MM. I think if we leave things to FH, we'll be fine. In summation, it may be that this was a pretty good job by our coach. It certainly appears that coaching this team was a strain. Next year should be better and more fun for all of us.
If were an 8 seed and this happened, fine. We were a four against a team that had to win its conference tourney to even get into the dance. Fred had nearly a week to prepare. Jared Haase seemed to figure out. He called timeouts before TV timeouts, so ISU could never get into a rhythm. Nice coaching and I'm not saying he is better.