Joe Lunardi Seeding

wonkadog

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2006
4,857
399
83
Ames, IA
So I guess Lunardi isn't updating his brackets as someone said he said over Twitter? Thought he was going to fix our seed and move us to the proper spot.
 

SerenityNow

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2009
3,929
1,779
113
Central Iowa
He does a good job predicting who makes it in, not so much predicting where they land. My admittedly unprofessional and biased opinion goes like this:

Lose today - 4
Win today - 3
Win tomorrow - 2
 

mkcrawford

Member
Mar 20, 2006
744
12
18
I think we're solid at #3 after yesterday. Maybe the "weakest" #3 since there's a log-jam at the 3/4 seeds. A win today and we're the top #3 seed. Win tomorrow and we're #2.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,602
23,501
10,030
Slim chance of 2 even with win today and tomorrow, but probably just as slim of chance at 4... regardless of today. Log-jam at top and incredibly week at the bottom (hence why Iowa is even above the bubble) - going to be an interesting tourney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonestate78

Cyclonestate78

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2008
12,115
646
113
Slim chance of 2 even with win today and tomorrow, but probably just as slim of chance at 4... regardless of today. Log-jam at top and incredibly week at the bottom (hence why Iowa is even above the bubble) - going to be an interesting tourney.

Seeding will be difficult because there are a lot of good teams but this year it seems like there are no "elite" teams.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,602
23,501
10,030
Seeding will be difficult because there are a lot of good teams but this year it seems like there are no "elite" teams.

Agree - the top 10 teams are all beatable by 15 and pretty much anybody in the dance will be capable of upending just about every other team. While upsets are always plentiful, this year's parity will make it hard to call anything an upset.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,602
23,501
10,030
Expect a 4 unless things go our way tonight.

Not a chance - it's easy for pundits to put us at the 4 spot but I don't see the selection committee making that type of mistake given all the stats in our favor.
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,572
39,419
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
I'm not trying to slam anyone but people who believe ISU is a 4 seed please post the resumes of the 12 teams that have better resumes and will be seeded on the 1 through 3 lines. If you look at them critically - like say, using the selection committee's nitty gritty sheets - I don't think they are there.

Please, if I am wrong, convince me.

That's not to say ISU won't be dropped to that line, but I just don't see the 12 teams deserving of placement above ISU.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,634
23,892
113
Macomb, MI
I'm not trying to slam anyone but people who believe ISU is a 4 seed please post the resumes of the 12 teams that have better resumes and will be seeded on the 1 through 3 lines. If you look at them critically - like say, using the selection committee's nitty gritty sheets - I don't think they are there.

Please, if I am wrong, convince me.

That's not to say ISU won't be dropped to that line, but I just don't see the 12 teams deserving of placement above ISU.

It's because some Cyclone fans wear their nut cups over their brains, not over their nuts.
 

Dingus

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2013
3,050
1,286
113
I don't disagree. A 2-seed is still out there if we win out and some other stuff goes down for teams competing for a 2.

With that said, I'd say our odds today are:

65%- 3 seed
25%- 4 seed
10%- 2 seed

This is about how I feel; expect a 3, would be disappointed with a 4, would be shocked and elated at a 2.

I'm one of those that has said we have no chance at a 2 seed, but this is probably closer to how I feel; perhaps 'slim chance' is more accurate than 'no chance'.

We got a 2 the Fizer/Tinsley year after dominating the Big 12 regular season and tournament. Just because.
 

Beyerball

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 18, 2013
7,476
6,829
113
Texas
Wouldn't we want to be say the best 4 seed rather than the worst 3 seed? Just from a standpoint of being put in the Midwest?
 

Psyclone Brian

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,507
237
63
42°00'50"N 93°
Does anybody have that stat about ISU being just behind Kansas vs. the top 50, (or something like that?) I hope the selection committee looks at that. Not to mention we still have the fewest over-all losses vs. other teams in our conference.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,634
23,892
113
Macomb, MI
Wouldn't we want to be say the best 4 seed rather than the worst 3 seed? Just from a standpoint of being put in the Midwest?

Who says we're the worst 3-seed? And what makes you think, as the best 4-seed, we would stay in the Midwest? We would get paired with the worst 1-seed, and for all we know that means we get shipped out West.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
Who says we're the worst 3-seed? And what makes you think, as the best 4-seed, we would stay in the Midwest? We would get paired with the worst 1-seed, and for all we know that means we get shipped out West.
West may be easiest place to be shipped for us to win....