Kum & Gone

CyDude16

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2008
22,492
11,757
113
Heads in the sky
The new team would be in the USL Championship which is right below MLS. Unless plans have changed.

The Menace are in USL2 which is like the 4th or 5th tier. The naming scheme is confusing intentionally I think, to make the USL amateur league sound higehr in the soccer pyramid than it actually is.

You’re right, I was mistaken. Could have sworn it was originally going to be the tier under championship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nor'MidWester

NickTheGreat

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 17, 2012
10,803
4,773
113
Central Iowa
Didn't he just sell his dad's company for $2 billion? You'd think he could use some of that money for his hobby.
 

Cyclone06

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
4,025
2,750
113
Urbandale
Sports teams are a business and if fans want them in their city why shouldn't they at least pay for some of the stadium cost? 50/50 sounds right to me.
And then when he sells the team and stadium he will split the profits 50/50 with the tax payers?

Its the "you pay to get me here, then I reap all the reward" that is the problem. If you want the full reward, pony up the full ante.
 

werdnamanhill

(⌐■_■)
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 23, 2017
3,396
6,125
113
28
Eastern IA -> Raleigh, NC -> Madison, WI
I agree it happens everywhere, and it is disgusting. Holding cities and states hostage threatening to move pro teams to suckle even more tax payer teet... I am sick of seeing it. And I sure as hell do not want to see it in "my backyard."

If that means no, very low level pro soccer in DSM, so be it.
USL Championship is only one step below MLS
 

deadeyededric

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
15,836
13,622
113
Parts Unknown
And then when he sells the team and stadium he will split the profits 50/50 with the tax payers?

Its the "you pay to get me here, then I reap all the reward" that is the problem. If you want the full reward, pony up the full ante.
If you don't pony up some other city will.
 

mayor4prez

New Member
Mar 18, 2012
12
0
1
Several mentioned that the toxic site will be cleaned up, but the construction plan is just a rebuilding of the existing "cap" for the site. It's hard to imagine it hasn't been leaking to the river right next door for years. No one else wants to touch it so it's cheap land.
 

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
35,491
31,651
113
Sports teams are a business and if fans want them in their city why shouldn't they at least pay for some of the stadium cost? 50/50 sounds right to me.

Seems like the general public never gets to have a say in these things. Let it go to a general election ballot in a November election. We all know only a third of the population will vote in it but it would be a wider cross section of the populace that usually gets a say.

Nothing against this project in particular I just get tired of seeing the general population support millionaire and billionaire hobbies that they sell of for hundreds of millions when they get tired of them. In this case I'm guessing it might be worth low millions when sold really have no idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 06_CY

deadeyededric

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
15,836
13,622
113
Parts Unknown
Seems like the general public never gets to have a say in these things. Let it go to a general election ballot in a November election. We all know only a third of the population will vote in it but it would be a wider cross section of the populace that usually gets a say.

Nothing against this project in particular I just get tired of seeing the general population support millionaire and billionaire hobbies that they sell of for hundreds of millions when they get tired of them. In this case I'm guessing it might be worth low millions when sold really have no idea.
I still don't understand why the general public doesn't think they should help pay for rich people's "hobbies" when they utilize the entertainment themselves. Just as a matter of principle. I don't look at stadiums any different than any other infrastructure projects honestly. You want big business and entertainment in your town you pay for it. I've lived in a few towns with pro sports teams and I guess I never expected to benefit monetarily from them. You rent basically rent them as a taxpayer the same way you pay monthly fees for things like Netflix. Just the way I look at it anyway.
 
Last edited:

cycloneML

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2008
5,207
2,071
113
I still don't understand why the general public doesn't think they should help pay for rich people's "hobbies" when they utilize the entertainment themselves. Just as a matter of principle. I don't look at stadiums any different than any other infrastructure projects honestly. You want big business and entertainment in your town you pay for it. I've lived in a few towns with pro sports teams and I guess I never expected to benefit monetarily from them. You rent basically rent them as a taxpayer the same way you pay monthly fees for things like Netflix. Just the way I look at it anyway.
True story. I read this and thought “this is a guy who’s at peace and sleeps well.” Then I see you posted at 3 am….
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nor'MidWester

Mr.G.Spot

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 22, 2020
5,748
180
113
60
American Equity was suppose to donate $5 million towards the project. With them being set to be sold to Canadian company Brookfield I wonder if that puts that money in danger.
If they are buying the stock of AE, you get all commitments and liabilities. It would be highly unusual to someone "cancel the commitment." If they are buying the assets of AE, then this commitment could be easily excluded. I have no idea of the acquisition structure. Brookfield is a great company. Great question.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneDaddy

Farnsworth

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
17,368
5,864
113
Des Moines, IA
I still don't understand why the general public doesn't think they should help pay for rich people's "hobbies" when they utilize the entertainment themselves. Just as a matter of principle. I don't look at stadiums any different than any other infrastructure projects honestly. You want big business and entertainment in your town you pay for it. I've lived in a few towns with pro sports teams and I guess I never expected to benefit monetarily from them. You rent basically rent them as a taxpayer the same way you pay monthly fees for things like Netflix. Just the way I look at it anyway.

I'm with you for the most part but Netflix isn't a great comparison. I pay for Netflix but I don't pay again every time I want to watch something, aka a ticket to use the venue.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,581
23,428
10,030
I still don't understand why the general public doesn't think they should help pay for rich people's "hobbies" when they utilize the entertainment themselves. Just as a matter of principle. I don't look at stadiums any different than any other infrastructure projects honestly. You want big business and entertainment in your town you pay for it. I've lived in a few towns with pro sports teams and I guess I never expected to benefit monetarily from them. You rent basically rent them as a taxpayer the same way you pay monthly fees for things like Netflix. Just the way I look at it anyway.
I look at it differently because we pay expensive tickets to attend said entertainment. Once they turn a profit, they don’t start paying us.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron