Now explain it to me like I’m 5.It’s not too tough to grasp.
There are 68 total teams in the field, meaning there has to be 4 teams eliminated before we have a field of 64, which is divisible by 16 and 4. 4 regionals with 16 teams in each region = 64.
There are 4 at large teams who have to play in the first four games (the other 4 teams are not at larges…in the tournament via autobid for winning a small conference tournament), hence “in the tournament” (field of 68) but they do not receive a bye since they have to play an extra game to get into the field of 64.
The “last 4 with byes” are already in the field of 64, meaning they do not have to play an extra game in “The First 4”.
USC would be a bad matchup for usLatest from The Field of 68. I would take this. I know many wouldn’t. I also would love to see Iowa vs Oklahoma in a 5/12
USC would be a bad matchup for us
The NCAA not wanting to call Dayton play in games makes it confusing. 68 team field with 60 byes, whatever.Now explain it to me like I’m 5.
Don’t know their MO but their size could bother us.That’s why I said many wouldn’t like it.
Not disagreeing with you, but considering our struggles, what team would be a good matchup for us?USC would be a bad matchup for us
A team who doesn’t come at your with a bunch of ball pressure would be preferable, I think.Not disagreeing with you, but considering our struggles, what team would be a good matchup for us?
@jereseib not sure why you’re disagreeing. I’m not a bracketologist. Just putting out what I’m seeing from those who do call them bracketologists.Tennessee starting to move to the 2 line. Replacing Villanova or Purdue, looks like.
USC would be a bad matchup for us
I just don't think the SEC will get three #2 seeds. I think Tennesse is slightly behind Kentucky and Auburn in that conference.@jereseib not sure why you’re disagreeing. I’m not a bracketologist. Just putting out what I’m seeing from those who do call them bracketologists.
From Andy Katz:
"Xavier has five Quadrant 1 wins, but the Musketeers went 2-8 in their final 10 games -- and even though the committee doesn't officially have "Last 10 Games" as a category, it's hard to say they were playing like an NCAA tournament team when the season ended. How do they compare to a Texas A&M team that was completely out of the picture a month ago, but has won seven in a row entering Sunday and has racked up three Quadrant 1 wins over that span?"
I'm sure ISU is comfortably in, but I also believe that late season performance is in the heads of selection committee members. Even though it's not an official selection criteria.
If Richmond wins does it hurt us in anyway?
Teams like Iowa that don't play defenseNot disagreeing with you, but considering our struggles, what team would be a good matchup for us?