Let’s talk about the refs

burn587

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 14, 2006
4,582
5,414
113
Denver, CO
They scored one TD that wasn't aided by a turnover or targeting penalty.... Play this game 10 times and ISU wins 9 of them. Today wasn't our day.
Montgomery’s fumble should’ve been whistled dead for having his forward progress stopped imo, but they seem to rarely blow the whistle until they’re on the ground anymore.
 

Yellow Snow

Full of nonsense....
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 19, 2006
2,498
2,213
113
Osage, IA
Montgomery’s fumble should’ve been whistled dead for having his forward progress stopped imo, but they seem to rarely blow the whistle until they’re on the ground anymore.

Problem is... that we were on the other end of that against Texas in 2013 I think. J. George got the strip fumble and was running the other way before the guy was down, but the ref blew the play dead due to "forward progress"... which isn't an actual rule in college.
 

CloneFan4

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2010
5,882
5,593
113
West Des Moines
In all of my life I have never seen a worse officiated game than this and I thought I'd never say that after last year's KSU fiasco. From the ground crew to the replay crew it was a total **** up.

-I counted at least three false starts on WSU (One for 6, another to secure the win) that the inept line judge failed to call.
-Minshew's knee was down on the near intentional grounding (not even a review)
-An argument to be made for Monty's forward progress being stopped on the fumble.
-Enyi's targeting call and ejection

With all of that I have also never seen a worse particular call and review than the Eaton "drop". The guy makes three football moves with clear possession, is down by contact before the ball comes out and is ruled incomplete ALL WITHOUT A BOOTH REVIEW causing us to challenge the obvious catch only to lose the challenge and a timeout.

***** and moan about penalties and turnovers we created all you want, but if you can't see that with fair officiating we win this game get ******.

As infuriating as it was to watch this unfold, I felt a cruel helplessness seeing the dejected faces of our players. Just as they were robbed of a win in Manhattan last year, they were robbed of an Alamo Bowl win tonight.
 

ArgentCy

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
20,405
11,148
113
In all of my life I have never seen a worse officiated game than this and I thought I'd never say that after last year's KSU fiasco. From the ground crew to the replay crew it was a total **** up.

-I counted at least three false starts on WSU (One for 6, another to secure the win) that the inept line judge failed to call.
-Minshew's knee was down on the near intentional grounding (not even a review)
-An argument to be made for Monty's forward progress being stopped on the fumble.
-Enyi's targeting call and ejection

With all of that I have also never seen a worse particular call and review than the Eaton "drop". The guy makes three football moves with clear possession, is down by contact before the ball comes out and is ruled incomplete ALL WITHOUT A BOOTH REVIEW causing us to challenge the obvious catch only to lose the challenge and a timeout.

***** and moan about penalties and turnovers we created all you want, but if you can't see that with fair officiating we win this game get ******.

As infuriating as it was to watch this unfold, I felt a cruel helplessness seeing the dejected faces of our players. Just as they were robbed of a win in Manhattan last year, they were robbed of an Alamo Bowl win tonight.

They did review that catch because Campbell challenged. It was literally about 5 seconds, because, well minds were already made up.
 

cc1091

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2007
1,146
305
83
Minneapolis
***** all you want about the terrible referees (and they were terrible), but the biggest problem was when we gave them their first touchdown (on the second interception.. well plus a couple of plays). We had multiple examples of the team not being focused (false starts, other penalties, turnovers, untypical Cyclone play). The best way to avoid terrible referee calls is to not commit anything that looks like it should be called.

Anyway, given that we played so poorly, I'm glad we actually did as well as we did. Afterall, WSU, deservedly or not, was ranked #13 going into this thing, and we pushed them all night. Given that we had a bad night and still had a very good chance to win the game, I think that's something. A different night with different refs, and this could easily have been a win.
 

Thomasrickj

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2012
7,870
5,773
113
Arlington, VA
The refs were terrible, but this was still a game we could've won fairly easily. Purdy had two horrible interceptions, the offensive line jumped way too much, and at the most critical time on the 2PC, plus our kicker just missed that 50 yarder off the post. I wish ISU had gone for it instead of kicking the field goal since the offense was cruising at the time, but oh well. Had ISU fixed two of those three mistakes, we would've won by a touchdown. This one can't be pinned on the officiating..
 

harimad

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2016
7,708
12,243
113
52
Illinois
Lol, ISU is undefeated. They’ve only lost to the refs. Rinse and repeat.

Actually, Peavy should have been ejected. So the refs did you a favor...
For a late hit out of bounds? Sure he should have been penalized... for unnecessary roughness. Not for targeting, numbnuts.
 

tolfbfan

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2015
2,927
4,634
113
59
Ohio
Was Washington State simulating the snap count causing way too many false starts?
If you noticed, their line was shifting late almost every snap. okay unless they were making a shift call that was intentionally trying to draw our o line into movement. If so, one of the referees....never mind.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: quasistellar