Matt Campbell quit on this team.

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,668
63,735
113
Not exactly sure.
While I don't think it ultimately would have mattered, he definitely quit and just accepted a loss. Down 17 points (3 possession game), our offense is playing with zero urgency and we punt on 4th and 5 with 8 or 9 minutes to go from our own 35 or 40. This is essentially waving the white flag as we aren't going to get the ball back until about 5:30 to play; making a 3 possession comeback nearly impossible. The way our defense was playing, if we don't convert, we worst case would have likely held them to a FG, making it still a 3 possession game. Again, probably wouldn't have mattered but extremely frustrating.
You have no clue. If he would have quit, he would have kept running the ball and not passed. He would have ran out the clock and not tried to kick the FG. You guys who think he quit are some of the biggest babies that don’t know anything about Campbell or the game it appears. Everything he did was to give ISU the best shot at winning. If one game gives you this type of crap to spew, please become Hawkeye fans because that is the stupid crap they yap about.

Did you leave a second before the game was over? If so, any of you then would be the quitters.
 

CysFam

Well-Known Member
Jul 24, 2021
211
318
63
38
Although these are kids, this isn’t little league anymore. Brock, Breece, Hutchinson we’re the ones who were not executing. If you don’t execute then put someone in who is or at least have a chance to. That’s what Campbell did.
This thread is embarrassing.
 

loyalsons4evertrue

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2020
2,960
3,578
113
26
Really no way for us to know what was the "right" decision. The future will tell, I suppose. Gotta trust CMC on this one. One thing is FOR SURE, though -- you can bet your ass every coach and player on this team is extremely unhappy with this result.

It comes back to one of those questions we often see people post on this forum: "would you be happy with an 11-1 or 10-2 regular season if it means one of those losses is to Iowa?" Almost everyone would say "yes", but it will always be painful when that loss comes.

I still think a big portion of the frustration isn't necessarily that we lost, but how we lost. Kinda like the last few losses to EIU-- we seem to just keep making critical mistakes and beating ourselves instead of Iowa making plays.
it gets exhausting when the defense plays lights out, but has to try to bail out our offense and special teams....they work way too hard to be put in the situations they are
 

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
12,461
10,784
113
Des Moines
It sounded like he was dinged up during summer camp so becnhing him probably had to do more with keeping him as healthy as possible.
He has to be dinged up, he doesn't look nearly as explosive as last year. I would play the other guys as much as possible and let him rest next weekend.

He had the most carries in college football last year also which I was concerned about going into this season .
 

isufbcurt

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2006
27,527
44,485
113
46
Newton
on the bright side, we won't play against a tougher defense than Iowa the rest of the season and I believe that. On the other side, Brock has looked a little shaky to start and I'd be curious to see if Dekkers gets some time against UNLV. That said, I love Brock and I feel like Tom Manning is turning us away from our potential. He runs the least inspiring, most bland style offense in CFB. I'm not saying we need to be flashy and do trick plays but it's like he has the exact same game plan no matter who we're playing and barely changes things up.

Our game plan should be the same for every team:

1. Feed Breece
2. Feed Breece
3. Feed Breece
4. Playaction TE's and WR
5. Repeat
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,648
79,975
113
DSM
Our game plan should be the same for every team:

1. Feed Breece
2. Feed Breece
3. Feed Breece
4. Playaction TE's and WR
5. Repeat

Our game plan also needs to include QB runs. Both designed and scrambling. tOSU won’t let Stroud run; LOST. ISU and/or Brock won’t run; LOST.

Also we need a Deshaunte Jones type receiver bad bad bad bad bad bad bad.
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,884
32,235
113
Parts Unknown
I knew when our first loss happened this year it would be epically bad around here but a take insinuating Matt quit is just awful. Like when did you forget about everything else he’s done here the last 5 years?

Or the NFL money he left on the table. Generational wealth type of cash.

The OP can pound sand. Absolute garbage
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,000
20,966
113
Sure, I don't like they amount of time chewed up getting plays off when Dekkers was in, but you have to set him up for success. That meant running the ball and taking a long time between snaps. In the end it was too conservative and we ran out of time.

But the bagging on Campbell is pretty ridiculous. My only major criticism is ISU has looked terrible in September consistently now for 6 years. Campbell knows it, and if he knew the answer he'd address it. He isn't fine with sucking in September, and it isn't some stupid thing like he doesn't care as much about Iowa as the conference games or as Mac did, or whatever idiotic nonsense people want to throw out there. If you want to achieve the goals that Campbell wants to and knows are attainable, you can't go into every conference season 2-1, and you can't lose conference game 1, which happened every year until 2020.

Look, until last year ISU had a swoon in November and December. They got a little better in correcting that each year. Every week you have a finite amount of time, and how much you focus on general fundamentals, your own execution of details and working against what the other team wants to do is adjusted throughout the year, and is adjusted based on your own performance. It is not a simple formula. How you do that, how much contact stuff you do, etc. all effects how well you play in September, October, November, and December, and there are tradeoffs for everything.

Their approach before led ISU to poor play in games 1-4, great play in games 5-8, and poor play in games 9-12. It seems like they have adjusted their approach, as well as developed the depth to be playing much better in games 9-12. They haven't cracked the game 1-4 nut yet. I'm not sure how you can't trust Campbell to eventually figure it out. Maybe ISU will always be a slow starter, but I bet they get ISU to the point where we can start playing much better and get out to a 4-0 start.
 

dafarmer

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2012
7,232
6,910
113
SW Iowa
15 yard curl by our tight ends? That was pretty much what Petras was throwing, but it was a 6 yard curl. Love our defense, but it is hard to get an interception if the pass is thrown before the receiver has mad his cut,
 

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,895
11,979
113
36
Dubuque
Maybe deckers actually sees the field and throws it, instead checking down all the time.
Let's be real here, Dekkers looked good but he only took what Iowa was giving him, and Iowa was giving him a lot more than they were giving Purdy. They were almost in full prevent mode by the time Dekkers came in and could have had 2nd stringers in for all we know. Dekkers wasn't doing much other than throwing 7-10 yard passes on crossing routes over the middle against a soft Iowa zone. Turn the page/burn the book whatever you gotta do. Brock is still the QB.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,668
63,735
113
Not exactly sure.
15 yard curl by our tight ends? That was pretty much what Petras was throwing, but it was a 6 yard curl. Love our defense, but it is hard to get an interception if the pass is thrown before the receiver has mad his cut,
Refs allowed non stop contact, big 12 refs don’t. We need to be more physical with big 10 refs.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,668
63,735
113
Not exactly sure.
Let's be real here, Dekkers looked good but he only took what Iowa was giving him, and Iowa was giving him a lot more than they were giving Purdy. They were almost in full prevent mode by the time Dekkers came in and could have had 2nd stringers in for all we know. Dekkers wasn't doing much other than throwing 7-10 yard passes on crossing routes over the middle against a soft Iowa zone. Turn the page/burn the book whatever you gotta do. Brock is still the QB.
They never put in second stringers so don’t even try that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lewey24

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,895
11,979
113
36
Dubuque
Brock had a stretch last year where he played poorly. Then at halftime of the Baylor game be snapped out of it and played really well the rest of the season. Some of the things that happened today were flukes. Two of the interceptions were tipped balls. On the first interception, I thought our guy was held. Breece Hall normally doesn't fumble. In the first half we had terrible field position - which, admittedly was partially due to sub-par special teams play. Good teams make their own luck, but we're not enough better than Iowa to overcome the things that went against us. It's silly to give up on this team. We have a whole conference season to play. We knew the stars would have to align to have a chance at the playoff. We got beat by a pretty good team - one which has a decent chance to win the conference.
Props to Iowa and all, but let's be real here...prior to the season nobody was saying or expecting this. Iowa is fluky. Could they win the conference? Maybe, Ohio St looks human this year. But this can't really be one of the best KF teams. Very opportunistic and fortunate so far this year. When they play someone that doesn't turn the ball over and has some semblance of competent offense, they will struggle to keep up.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron