***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***

Mumbai1986

Well-Known Member
Mar 9, 2008
3,530
29
48
Arlington, VA
Big win by California over Oregon. They have swept Oregon, beaten Arizona, and UCLA. The only really bad loss is to Stanford, Washington and Harvard. And those losses are not that bad. Mike Montgomery's team looks like a safe bet for the tournament.
 

Cy$

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2011
24,085
6,031
113
Ames
Big win by California over Oregon. They have swept Oregon, beaten Arizona, and UCLA. The only really bad loss is to Stanford, Washington and Harvard. And those losses are not that bad. Mike Montgomery's team looks like a safe bet for the tournament.

they got a very favorable schedule remaining. @Oregon St., Utah, and Stanford. Also play vs. Colorado. As long as they don't lose to Oregon St. or Utah they'll be in. 4 top 50 RPI wins will look good.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,888
26,935
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Big win by California over Oregon. They have swept Oregon, beaten Arizona, and UCLA. The only really bad loss is to Stanford, Washington and Harvard. And those losses are not that bad. Mike Montgomery's team looks like a safe bet for the tournament.

That was a huge win. Cal went from play-in to "in" right now.

Re: Arkansas — That's one of those sneak-up-on-us teams — they've never truly entered the bubble discussion, but body of work holds up well compared to teams that can't seem to fall off the bubble even if they tried.
 

isuchicago

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
1,354
64
48
BYU in a close one at St Marys. Down 2 with a minute to go.. didn't realize BYU already had 20 wins
 

CycloneDaddy

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2006
8,407
7,855
113
Johnston
BYU in a close one at St Marys. Down 2 with a minute to go.. didn't realize BYU already had 20 wins
Well I don't think it is that hard to get to 20 wins with their schedule. Their best win of the year was against TN State with an RPI of 87 and it was the 1st game of the year.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,888
26,935
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Well I don't think it is that hard to get to 20 wins with their schedule. Their best win of the year was against TN State with an RPI of 87 and it was the 1st game of the year.

BYU is toast for an at-large. No wins against a single team with legitimate at-large merit.

I'm not even sure beating St. Mary's could've lifted the status. SMC's best foot forward is the top-50 losses (twice to Gonzaga, neutral loss vs Notre Dame).
 

isuchicago

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
1,354
64
48
BYU is toast for an at-large. No wins against a single team with legitimate at-large merit.

I'm not even sure beating St. Mary's could've lifted the status. SMC's best foot forward is the top-50 losses (twice to Gonzaga, neutral loss vs Notre Dame).

Agree on both. I hadn't followed BYU after we blew them out. I know they're not a tournament team, but I was pretty surprised seeing them in the top 70 even.

If St Marys loses to Creighton, I don't think they deserve to be in. And if creighton loses, its entirely possible they play their way out. They picked a bad time to play their worst basketball. Could see them losing their last 3.
 

cycloneworld

Facebook Knows All
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2006
30,192
22,545
113
Urbandale, IA
Back in the 12/12 playoff game in Palm's bracket, god I bet he hated having to do that.

And he has Oklahoma as a 7 (similar resume as we have). Speaking of, how is Oklahoma 18th in the RPI? Somehow their SOS is 4. But they are 1-4 against Top 25, 2-6 against Top 50.

Compare that to ISU. We are 2-3 against Top 25 and 2-5 against Top 50. SOS is worse at 77.

RPI is quickly becoming vastly overrated. For example, Middle Tennessee State has a RPI of 23. Their SOS is 104. They are 0-1 against the Top 25 and 0-2 against Top 50. Basically no quality wins.
 

Chitowncy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jan 14, 2009
2,295
1,572
113
Ames
Lunardi has us as a 10 seed moving up against Oregon again.
Bracketology - NCAA College Basketball Brackets and Predictions - ESPN

The way things are trending, ISU could be headed to the dreaded 8 - 9 game again this year. I imagine we'll finish either finishing 12 - 6 in the conference or 11 - 7. This season could finish eerily similar to last year.

However, unlike last year, I think ISU can avoid the 8 - 9 game with a good showing in the Big 12 tourney. Last year this team was 12 - 6 in conference heading into the tournament, then it stubbed its toe. I think if ISU had beaten Texas, they would have stayed at the 7 seed line. If this year's team can avoid that (assuming a 12 - 6 finish), then we might be able to make the 7 seed line. However, if the team finishes 11 - 7 in conference, then they may have to get all the way to the Big 12 Championship game.

I think we'll win out at home, but lose to either OU or WVA.
 

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
The way things are trending, ISU could be headed to the dreaded 8 - 9 game again this year. I imagine we'll finish either finishing 12 - 6 in the conference or 11 - 7. This season could finish eerily similar to last year.

I don't want the 8 - 9 game either this year, but as others have mentioned, it is much less scary this season than it was last year. Kentucky was head and shoulders above the rest last year and we were stuck with them. I'm not afraid to play Indiana or Miami as opposed to Michigan State or Florida... they're all pretty much on the same level.
 

Chitowncy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jan 14, 2009
2,295
1,572
113
Ames
I don't want the 8 - 9 game either this year, but as others have mentioned, it is much less scary this season than it was last year. Kentucky was head and shoulders above the rest last year and we were stuck with them. I'm not afraid to play Indiana or Miami as opposed to Michigan State or Florida... they're all pretty much on the same level.

Agree re: Kentucky last year. This year, I agree regarding all the teams in the field, except Indiana. I think they'll be the team to beat come Tourney time, but they don't have as much talent as Kentucky had last year.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,682
80,074
113
DSM
Honestly the 5/12, 6/11, 7/10, and 8/9 lines this year really don't have as much differentiation as it stands now, 2nd (3rd) round is going to be a similar level opponent. I would like to avoid Michigan and Indiana for as long as possible otherwise bring it on.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,888
26,935
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
I don't want the 8 - 9 game either this year, but as others have mentioned, it is much less scary this season than it was last year. Kentucky was head and shoulders above the rest last year and we were stuck with them. I'm not afraid to play Indiana or Miami as opposed to Michigan State or Florida... they're all pretty much on the same level.

If something close to Lunardi's bracket held, and regional placement was moved slightly, I'd take the 8/9 of this sort:

1. Gonzaga
16. (Sixteen)
8. Iowa State
9. Creighton/WSU

... although I doubt three Midwest teams would end up w/ Gonzaga, since that subregion would probably be Boise ... not enough geographic advantage for a 1.

Now if those types of matchups came in the 2-15/7-10 bracket ...
 

wonkadog

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2006
4,857
399
83
Ames, IA
I liked it better when we were an 11 seed against them. I forget who the 2nd round draw was going to be for that one, but MSU is a tough draw

Geez, take a look at that entire East region in the latest version. That is an absolutely brutal region overall.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron