*** Official #24 IOWA STATE VS #13 Washington State Game(Day) Thread ***

cyclonefan1983

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2009
1,758
173
48
42
I will say it. When was the last game Iowa State had a player called for targeting with an ejection before tonight under Campbell?
 

IcSyU

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2007
28,309
6,981
113
Defense is going to have to force 2 or more turnovers in the second half to have a chance. WSU doesn't give a few plays away throwing down the field...just kill ya with 1,000 paper cuts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Die4Cy

cyclones12321

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2009
8,258
1,772
113
38
Newton Ia
Hoping for players to react to Campbell like Kansas always do when self gets a technical. Hopefully the officiating also reacts the way they do when self gets a technical
 

harimad

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2016
7,731
12,320
113
52
Illinois
No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)

Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:

  • Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
  • A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
  • Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
  • Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
I'm sorry I keep coming back to this. I am livid. Read the rule. Targeting REQUIRES at least one of the four bulleted indicators. Ewa's play satisfies ZERO indicators.
1. No launch.
2. No crouch followed by upward thrust
3. No leading with anything to the head or neck area. First contact was hands to chest.
4. No lowering the head or attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet. It was inadvertent contact.
 

CNECloneFan

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2012
21,821
2,115
113
I'm sorry I keep coming back to this. I am livid. Read the rule. Targeting REQUIRES at least one of the four bulleted indicators. Ewa's play satisfies ZERO indicators.
1. No launch.
2. No crouch followed by upward thrust
3. No leading with anything to the head or neck area. First contact was hands to chest.
4. No lowering the head or attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet. It was inadvertent contact.
Apparently the "crown of the helmet" extends down to the Iowa State defender's eyebrows.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron