*** Official Drake VS #23 IOWA STATE Game(Day) Thread ***

tolfbfan

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2015
2,927
4,634
113
59
Ohio
A 2010 study looking at collegiate football injuries showed that FieldTurf may actually be safer than natural grass for injuries in general. ... Wearing cleats made specifically for artificial turf, or better yet turf shoes, may help to decrease traction and therefore reduce lower extremity injuries.Oct 2, 2013

A few different studies have looked into the injury rates of athletes playing on grass and turf surfaces, and generally have found that neither surface leads to significantly more injuries than the other.

So what makes one surface more dangerous to play on than another? According to Mark Drakos, most scientists believe there are two features of turf and grass that affect injury rates: the coefficient of friction and the coefficient of restitution. The coefficient of friction is exactly what it sounds like, how much friction the surface creates. For instance, a low coefficient of friction would cause people to slip a lot, whereas a high coefficient of friction creates a stickier surface. Therefore, surfaces with higher coefficients of friction cause more ACL injuries because there is not as much “give” on the turf or grass. Similarly, a higher coefficient of restitution will, in general, cause more injuries. Basically, the coefficient of restitution means how hard the surface is and is measured with a G-max value. For instance, concrete has a very high G-max value. Consequently, certain grass and turf fields have higher G-max values, which lead to a higher rate of concussions and other contact injuries.

No opinion personally,just copied stuff I found.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Prone2Clone

SpokaneCY

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
13,294
8,489
113
Spokane, WA
giphy.gif

YUM! So - what does your husband eat?
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
That Mike Rose TO TD last week - was that a fumble-6 or a pick-6? Viewing another replay angle that ball never touched the ground so it’s a clear TO no matter what, just curious.
 

CyCloned

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
13,602
6,968
113
Robins, Iowa
That Mike Rose TO TD last week - was that a fumble-6 or a pick-6? Viewing another replay angle that ball never touched the ground so it’s a clear TO no matter what, just curious.

I am pretty sure that it was an INT. Had to laugh watching the play over because the KSU OL was holding Rose really bad, but let go of him after he intercepted the ball.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,290
55,197
113
I think it was determined a fumble because the ball was lost before the quarterback threw the ball.

I was curious to see how they would have called it if it had hit the ground.

Looked like a touch of forward motion from the QB.
 

FerShizzle

person slash genius
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 5, 2013
16,117
20,060
113
Des Moines
That Mike Rose TO TD last week - was that a fumble-6 or a pick-6? Viewing another replay angle that ball never touched the ground so it’s a clear TO no matter what, just curious.
Pretty sure it was ruled a fumble.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron