So what you are saying is the officials aren't very good and inconsistent in their calling and could easily catch mistakes with replay? Thanks for proving my point.If you don’t think we get calls during game, you’re not being objective. We committed back to back PI against Texas in the end zone yesterday. Neither got called and they didn’t score.
My main point behind all of this is that in both football and basketball we, the viewers can see things better from 1000 miles away than a lot of these referees and umpires. There are many reasons for this, but I don't understand why we don't utilize more technology to provide a better officiated game. It is absolutely possible.
Heck, you could even have juries deciding plays as fast as officials do right now. And if you say that the whole thing would slow down because their are infractions on every play. Then you have just proven my point again. The officials are having to pick and choose what is and what isn't worth calling on every play which is the definition of inconsistency.
For instance. I could have looked at the quarterback hit yesterday and replayed it twice before I had to call roughing the passer while sitting in the comfort of my home (or a back room at the stadium) It is easier to see that that hit was bang, bang, not driven to the ground using excessive force or purposefully rolling over on (or whatever stupid excuse they would have given if questioned) than some dude seeing it out the corner of his eye and assuming it "must have been bad" because they are watching the field and didn't see the whole combination of events from a good vantage point.
I believe there are ways to make this better and to get rid of some of the biases that individuals have by crowdsourcing. Go ahead and beat me up on this. But, I think it is a viable answer to the problem.