You do know Auburns three point defense is one of the best in the country right
I'm in the 'throw the metrics out in the first round' camp.
You do know Auburns three point defense is one of the best in the country right
Nevada and AZ st play Wednesday, then again Friday. Both Iowa St and TCU play the play in game winners on Friday.We play Friday don’t we? It would be Wednesday
3 of the play-in game winners play on Friday so one of the matchups will play on Tuesday instead. Lucky us, it's the Pitt MSST game that was chosen (don't know why)We play Friday don’t we? It would be Wednesday
3 of the play-in game winners play on Friday so one of the matchups will play on Tuesday instead. Lucky us, it's the Pitt MSST game that was chosen (don't know why)
Been saying it on here for a couple of weeks, how in the heck does the #1 ranked conference by every metric get fewer teams in than the SEC and the B10? I thought the rankings matter, if that is what the numbers say, then Ok. State and even TT belonged in before some of the lower ranked NET teams from the B10 and SEC.
I'm guessing because those two were higher on the master seed list than Arizona State and Nevada.3 of the play-in game winners play on Friday so one of the matchups will play on Tuesday instead. Lucky us, it's the Pitt MSST game that was chosen (don't know why)
Just filled out my first bracket. Obviously put loads of effort into it.
Kansas repeats as champs.
Houston and Bama lose 2nd round.
Yeah I don’t get that.Nevada and AZ st play Wednesday, then again Friday. Both Iowa St and TCU play the play in game winners on Friday.
Miss st and Pitt get extra day I guess
I don't think anybody's being naive here about the Big XII being the best conference. And of course the metrics mattered to the committee.I just think we've had a lot of naïve folks around here lately. End of the day, the committee members are humans using judgement to figure this all out. Doesn't matter what's on the "team sheet' or not, or what the stated metrics and criteria are.
They didn't like the big 12 as much as the metrics did. I tired to suggest the big 12 is "overrated", while still being the best conference and people told me I was a moron.
Anyway, seed doesn't matter, you have to play great teams regardless.
Go cyclones
I think that will be an interesting game. I don't know a thing about Auburn, but the fact that they are a good defensive team doesn't help Iowa. The Hawk can still get stupid hot from the outside, and they will not throw the game away with turnovers.Auburn will **** Iowa
Naturally, that means if they play Iowa State they will shoot 65% from the field, 50% from three and 100% from FTs.So looking at MSU stats, they shoot 43% from the field, 64% from the line and like 27% from 3.
This ibased on ESPN stats so they could be wrong, but that is ugly
They kind of remind me of ISU of last year. They hit the boards hard.
So looking at MSU stats, they shoot 43% from the field, 64% from the line and like 27% from 3.
This ibased on ESPN stats so they could be wrong, but that is ugly
They kind of remind me of ISU of last year. They hit the boards hard.
Houston loses to Auburn then?
I meant the idiot beside beside Kellogg. read my edited version.The "idiot" beside him is Jay Wright. Former head coach of Villanova. Who's been to multiple final fours and has won a nation title. I think he knows a thing or two about basketball. The guy to his left...Seth Davis, is moronic foolbrain.
Yeah that's the only explanation that makes sense. I would have put the other game on Tuesday just due to those teams' travel distance and needing to play the next one in Denver vs. GreensboroI'm guessing because those two were higher on the master seed list than Arizona State and Nevada.