*** Official SEMO vs IOWA STATE Game(Day) Thread ***

Beyerball

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 18, 2013
7,473
6,814
113
Texas
My Thoughts:

Dekkers looked pretty darn good for first start..Had the 1 bad throw.

Felt Dekkers threw a really nice ball and he can sling it.

XH is a freaking stud.

Totally bumbed about Norton..ugh and ugh. Man he was looking all of the part. Really hope he didn't pull his hammy..

I thought it took 2 qtrs but OL finally started to assert itself and get a rythym and Brock ran hard..

On D. I thought our DB's looked pretty good. LB's did not. SEMO QB I felt was actually very solid and can run but our LB's did not play well.

We basically shut down any run game by them which is good but those QB scrambles killers..

Heacock didn't get fancy at all.. Very basic soft coverage stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: t-noah

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,815
26,839
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Relaxing opening-day win for a change. I got a tiny bit nervous at end of 1st half, but holding to FG and then the 2nd half drive and it was cruise-control.

Running game got going well after half. Seemed unbalanced in 1st half, but actually I like to see stretching the field, getting some quick passes in space, to open up and pile up some TDs, then follow by more methodical ground-pound. Usually it's vanilla runs and safe passes in early stages and one-dimensional the other way, sometimes kind of stagnant.

If we can replicate that approach vs. Iowa, I like the chances.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,581
23,430
10,030
Good outing. Strong on O with a well rounded game. Defense showed up in the second half. ST wasn’t out in any real positions to make a difference either way, which is good in itself. Great day.
 

Big Daddy Kang

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2021
653
816
93
49
Nice game. Learned a couple things:

1. It's pronounced (Beau) Freeler.
2. Crotch stink is a thing.
 

CentexCyclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2015
5,255
4,182
113
Relaxing opening-day win for a change. I got a tiny bit nervous at end of 1st half, but holding to FG and then the 2nd half drive and it was cruise-control.

Running game got going well after half. Seemed unbalanced in 1st half, but actually I like to see stretching the field, getting some quick passes in space, to open up and pile up some TDs, then follow by more methodical ground-pound. Usually it's vanilla runs and safe passes in early stages and one-dimensional the other way, sometimes kind of stagnant.

If we can replicate that approach vs. Iowa, I like the chances.
The style of play Cyclone Offense showed today has a chance to replicate the Purdue play book from last year: working mainly short to mid-range routes, attack the edge in the run game.. ... forcing 4 picks on Defense would help too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: t-noah and MugNight

ComCY

Well-Known Member
Oct 31, 2016
1,538
2,150
113
A game by Offense. B on defense. C on ST. Weak kickoffs, weak returns, no pressure on punter, almost gave up a blocked punt, pretty good coverage on kickoffs.
we had 3 or 4 touchbacks, and a blocked FG... the bad kickoffs were into the wind
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron