Oliver Luck Will Serve as a Consultant to the Big 12

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,858
62,435
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Who made the decision? Was it Bob Bowlsby, the AD's, a board? Who? Did Luck himself apply to the Big 12 to offer his services? Will his charge be to take the Big 12 in a new strategic direction, be the point person to negotiate new alliances or sell the Big 12 for parts and find us soft landing places. I don't think we'll know that until we see a final report.

I've been a consultant, hired consultants and been "consulted" out of a job. Most of the time the recommendation and action steps were not unanticipated and were developed to give cover to those who have to make hard decisions on the future of the company.

Have some decisions already been made and Luck has been brought in to make these happen, or is he here to truly chart a new dynamic course and make that happen?

I'm simply not familiar enough with the XFL and his leadership. What was the final read on him for his efforts there?

Regarding the XFL, I think it's hard to read one way or the other, as Luck's timing was quite unlucky.

It is curious though, as to me, it signals that someone feels the need for more firepower than just Bowlsby.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,839
63,959
113
Not exactly sure.
Remember, with the potential lawsuit. This allows the big 12 and teams to have someone talk to all conferences, media companies, other teams about expansion, or whatever they dream up; without technically talking to them since they can say their consultants did that on their own.

What do consultants normally do in these matters? They meet and ask you would you are wanting done and what you would like to see and then do it. If we are looking to expand, it maybe good or bad. It may mean our options are shot, or it means we have found another media partner (like Amazon or such) that says they will keep us in a similar ballpark as now but need to be 16 teams or something.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,215
7,785
113
Dubuque
Doesn’t it seem like this hire is to facilitate life after OU/Texas leave? Especially with the alliance announcement coming tomorrow?
Could be creating a transition plan once Bowlsby leaves due to retirement or being pushed out. But, I doubt they are looking that far ahead from a personnel standpoint.

IMO the Big12 is bringing on a seasoned college sport administrator whose FULL TIME responsibility is to navigate the Big12 through realignment. Determining if the Big12 is an adder of schools or if the 8 will have landing places elsewhere.

Just like schools hiring search firms when hiring a head coach, bringing on Luck provides the same advantages. He can probably contact people discreetly.

Also bringing on Luck allows Bowlsby to spend his workday leading the Big12, after all there is still a conference until 2025 if OU/UT honor their GOR.

Also if this becomes a litigation sheet show, my guess is Bowlsby will be pretty busy. And Luck might take on a day-to-day role.

Lastly with Luck's XFL experience he might have some new media approaches for Big12.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclone87

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
I love the idea, but we need at least ten teams to have a championship game, right? Otherwise we're leaving extra money on the table.

Correct, we need either 10 teams with a round robin, or at least 12 teams with divisions, or we need to get the NCAA’s permission to have a CCG. For example the American got permission to have a CCG with 11 schools and 2 divisions after UConn bailed, but that permission is only a 2-year waiver and it might not be renewed.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: CYCLNST8

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,054
21,049
113
This will be a tough balancing act for Bowlsby, Luck and the ADs and Presidents if some teams have opportunities and some do not. Not only how/if expansion is pursued, but the motivation to drag out any OU/UT/ESPN legal issues.

Bottom line is, what's best for some of the individual schools may not be best for the conference.
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
This will be a tough balancing act for Bowlsby, Luck and the ADs and Presidents if some teams have opportunities and some do not. Not only how/if expansion is pursued, but the motivation to drag out any OU/UT/ESPN legal issues.

Bottom line is, what's best for some of the individual schools may not be best for the conference.

Any school who gets interest will be incentivized to keep it quiet or else the other Big 8 schools without interest could try to torpedo it. Especially in a KU/K-State situation if one has a potential lifeboat and the other’s best option is keeping the 8 together, as they answer to the same political leaders.

I don’t envy their jobs now but I’m sure they understand that if ISU and KU got B1G invites, we absolutely have to take those. There isn’t really any negotiation to be had at that point. Same with WVU and the ACC, and same with any of us and the Pac-12 honestly.
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,534
31,877
113
This will be a tough balancing act for Bowlsby, Luck and the ADs and Presidents if some teams have opportunities and some do not. Not only how/if expansion is pursued, but the motivation to drag out any OU/UT/ESPN legal issues.

Bottom line is, what's best for some of the individual schools may not be best for the conference.

I would bet good money that the strategy isn't to drag out the OU and UT debacle. They are going to settle and it will probably happen sooner rather than later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclones1969

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,940
32,331
113
Parts Unknown
Everyone is crapping on Bowlsby but what exactly could or or should he have done? Beebe is the one who completely effed things up and it seems like Bob has actually done a pretty good job keeping things together. He was never going to stop OU and UT from leaving.

Bob isn't the bad guy here. Oklahoma, Texas, the SEC and ESPN can all **** themselves sideways with the money grab circle jerk
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,534
31,877
113
Any school who gets interest will be incentivized to keep it quiet or else the other Big 8 schools without interest could try to torpedo it. Especially in a KU/K-State situation if one has a potential lifeboat and the other’s best option is keeping the 8 together, as they answer to the same political leaders.

I don’t envy their jobs now but I’m sure they understand that if ISU and KU got B1G invites, we absolutely have to take those. There isn’t really any negotiation to be had at that point. Same with WVU and the ACC, and same with any of us and the Pac-12 honestly.

I still don't see how you can handcuff the remaining 8 institutions. Isn't their a legal argument to be made that they were basically forced to explore their options due to financial obligations etc? OU and UT will have to pay but I can't see anything against the remaining 8 holding up in court. At this point it's all posturing IMO.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,054
21,049
113
I would bet good money that the strategy isn't to drag out the OU and UT debacle. They are going to settle and it will probably happen sooner rather than later.
Generally speaking I'm sure that's the case, but there's probably a tradeoff between dollars and time. Schools that feel like they have opportunities are going to be more willing to take less money and want to dissolve the conference. Schools that don't feel good about their prospects are going to want to drag it out, max the cash and maybe even enforce GoR for remaining teams that try to leave.

To me the ideal is to get it done quickly with enough cash to enable schools to leave and endure reduced media rights to make themselves more attractive to conferences. Obviously part of that needs to be no recourse for OU and UT if the conference dissolves shortly after, but that goes without saying.
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,534
31,877
113
Generally speaking I'm sure that's the case, but there's probably a tradeoff between dollars and time. Schools that feel like they have opportunities are going to be more willing to take less money and want to dissolve the conference. Schools that don't feel good about their prospects are going to want to drag it out, max the cash and maybe even enforce GoR for remaining teams that try to leave.

To me the ideal is to get it done quickly with enough cash to enable schools to leave and endure reduced media rights to make themselves more attractive to conferences. Obviously part of that needs to be no recourse for OU and UT if the conference dissolves shortly after, but that goes without saying.

The thing that doesn't get talked about enough is the possibility of individual schools going after OU and UT. Lets say Baylor or TCU gets left in the cold in this whole deal. They would have a really solid platform to go after both OU and UT for a crap ton of money. Just my two cents but this discussion doesn't just stop and start with the league as a whole.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyputz

Cyclones1969

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
8,885
6,077
113
55
I still don't see how you can handcuff the remaining 8 institutions. Isn't their a legal argument to be made that they were basically forced to explore their options due to financial obligations etc? OU and UT will have to pay but I can't see anything against the remaining 8 holding up in court. At this point it's all posturing IMO.

I would assume it’s part of the negotiations with the potential landing spots. Everything will be in place when the conference dissolves.

But they have to get through the legal stuff first.

Then middle Tennessee and south Alabama can come in to the conference, and we can start playing in the new and improved big 12
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,054
21,049
113
I still don't see how you can handcuff the remaining 8 institutions. Isn't their a legal argument to be made that they were basically forced to explore their options due to financial obligations etc? OU and UT will have to pay but I can't see anything against the remaining 8 holding up in court. At this point it's all posturing IMO.

I guess it depends if there is some sort of reset of GoR in a post-OU/UT world. It surely should not be punitive to remaining schools that leave, but again, if half or more of the schools feel like they don't have suitors and are best served sticking together and expanding you might see a push to handcuff schools from leaving.