I imagine there is tons of misinformation in a "documentary" like this. If you have ever seen a 60 minutes or dateline story about something you have first hand knowledge of you know how loose these types of shows are with the "facts" as they build their one sided cases. Haven't seen it, might watch it, but the brief research I did leads me to believe the proper people are probably in jail. People outraged should be calling for a new trial not a pardon.
Just finished the series tonight. Wow, what a ride. I have about 99% confidence that Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey didn't do it based on what was shown in the series. The sheriff's, police, and judicial departments in that county are crooked as **** and definitely had it out for Steven. They definitely called in some favors to the state and are protecting their own.
I imagine there is tons of misinformation in a "documentary" like this. If you have ever seen a 60 minutes or dateline story about something you have first hand knowledge of you know how loose these types of shows are with the "facts" as they build their one sided cases. Haven't seen it, might watch it, but the brief research I did leads me to believe the proper people are probably in jail. People outraged should be calling for a new trial not a pardon.
The brother and ex rubbed me the wrong way to. Maybe it is just the fact that he works for the Packers though.
I don't know if SA is innocent but they didn't have any conclusive evidence to say it was him imo. As you mentioned he apparently was smart enough to completely clean the garage of any DNA but not properly get rid of the car?
Sorry if already posted but a juror apparently came forward and said that they thought Avery was not guilty but feared for their own personal safety and voted guilty.
http://www.nbcchicago.com/entertain...-364234661.html?_osource=SocialFlowFB_CHBrand
"The juror contacted us directly ... and went on to describe the jurors ultimately trading votes in the jury room and explicitly discussing, 'If you vote guilty on this count, I will vote not guilty on this count,'" Ricciardi said.
The juror told the filmmakers that they hoped a split verdict would send a message to the appellate courts to give Avery a new trial.
"That was sort of their plan but obviously it didn’t work out that way," Ricciardi said.
WTF kind of logic is that? Jesus ****** if I ever get a "jury of my peers" I'll just walk into jail myself and skip the 3 weeks of pretend. **** that.
not only is it poor logic, but I'm pretty sure it goes against the very jury instructions that I'm sure they were given before they went into the room.
As dumbfounding as the shoddy police work was, what happened with the jury is the most mind-boggling thing about this case.
The DA and sheriff going on TV to outline what they concocted from a coerced confession before the trial started was the beginning of the end. Good luck with an impartial jury unless the jurors were from at least two states away.
hhAlright is anyone not thinking the brother and the ex? there was one TV interview that they did that was really really sketchy.
And the fact that it only took 25 minutes to find the RAV 4 is waaay too coincidental, the lot was 40 acres, it would take days do find that if it was already there, and the way it was "covered" up was really terrible, wouldn't they crush it and just get rid of it all together?
Just a lot of weird things that were to supposed to happen, didn't. Like no evidence of theresa ever being in the trailer, much like brendan, no evidence of him.
At the end of the trial, the prosecution even said there is one man, and one man only that did this... Wouldn't that make the defense that much easier? Blows my mind that both of them are in jail.
not only is it poor logic, but I'm pretty sure it goes against the very jury instructions that I'm sure they were given before they went into the room.
As dumbfounding as the shoddy police work was, what happened with the jury is the most mind-boggling thing about this case.