OT: Making A Murderer on Netflix

packattack425

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 25, 2010
2,544
1,882
113
Des Moines
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    85.4 KB · Views: 482

ThatllDoCy

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2009
17,991
11,144
113
53
Minneapolis, MN
www.katchllc.com
I imagine there is tons of misinformation in a "documentary" like this. If you have ever seen a 60 minutes or dateline story about something you have first hand knowledge of you know how loose these types of shows are with the "facts" as they build their one sided cases. Haven't seen it, might watch it, but the brief research I did leads me to believe the proper people are probably in jail. People outraged should be calling for a new trial not a pardon.

I agree with you on this point. I didn't come away necessarily thinking that Avery is innocent, but I did not come away thinking Adnan Syed is innocent from Serial/Undisclosed/Truth&Justice. I think it is natural to want to believe that the protagonist is innocent in a story, but this is real life. I think that Avery is a suspect, but I don't believe they proved his guilt.

The investigation got a conviction not the truth. Which gives me reasonable doubt. If Manitowoc had actually not been involved the framing defense would not have validity, but they were involved.

The sad part is that there will be no effort on the part of the State to investigate this crime and to find out what happened because they have their conviction and will defend that rigorously.
 

Dannynoonan

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 5, 2015
899
944
93
54
Just finished the series tonight. Wow, what a ride. I have about 99% confidence that Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey didn't do it based on what was shown in the series. The sheriff's, police, and judicial departments in that county are crooked as **** and definitely had it out for Steven. They definitely called in some favors to the state and are protecting their own.

A lot is going on right now towards trying to get a mistrial. hopefully this is a good week for their attorneys getting what they need. this documentary has many people near manitowoc worried!
 

wxman1

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 2, 2008
19,946
16,336
113
Cedar Rapids
I imagine there is tons of misinformation in a "documentary" like this. If you have ever seen a 60 minutes or dateline story about something you have first hand knowledge of you know how loose these types of shows are with the "facts" as they build their one sided cases. Haven't seen it, might watch it, but the brief research I did leads me to believe the proper people are probably in jail. People outraged should be calling for a new trial not a pardon.

I agree we only got mostly one side. What everyone is upset about is how badly the investigation and trial were handled. He very well may have been guilty but they have not proven that which is the injustice.
 

VTXCyRyD

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2010
5,650
3,015
113
The brother and ex rubbed me the wrong way to. Maybe it is just the fact that he works for the Packers though.

I don't know if SA is innocent but they didn't have any conclusive evidence to say it was him imo. As you mentioned he apparently was smart enough to completely clean the garage of any DNA but not properly get rid of the car?

Except they found DNA in cracks on the floor of the garage, it belonged to SA. There was no clean up of the garage and no DNA from from Teresa was found. Should have been plenty if she was shot multiple times in the head in the garage.

This show makes me angry and really sad for the education system in Wisconsin.
 

Skidoosh

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2012
2,699
769
113
The best part was when Halbach's brother is talking to the reporters about Brendons confession:

Brother: "I think anyone who watches Brendons confession will know that Steven is guilty"
Reporter: "Have you watched the confession?"
Brother: "No I have not"

Amazing how he just makes up his mind instantly.
 

Skidoosh

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2012
2,699
769
113
Sorry if already posted but a juror apparently came forward and said that they thought Avery was not guilty but feared for their own personal safety and voted guilty.

http://www.nbcchicago.com/entertain...-364234661.html?_osource=SocialFlowFB_CHBrand

"The juror contacted us directly ... and went on to describe the jurors ultimately trading votes in the jury room and explicitly discussing, 'If you vote guilty on this count, I will vote not guilty on this count,'" Ricciardi said.


The juror told the filmmakers that they hoped a split verdict would send a message to the appellate courts to give Avery a new trial.
"That was sort of their plan but obviously it didn’t work out that way," Ricciardi said.




WTF kind of logic is that? Jesus ****** if I ever get a "jury of my peers" I'll just walk into jail myself and skip the 3 weeks of pretend. **** that.
 

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,457
4,721
113
Altoona
WTF kind of logic is that? Jesus ****** if I ever get a "jury of my peers" I'll just walk into jail myself and skip the 3 weeks of pretend. **** that.

not only is it poor logic, but I'm pretty sure it goes against the very jury instructions that I'm sure they were given before they went into the room.

As dumbfounding as the shoddy police work was, what happened with the jury is the most mind-boggling thing about this case.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,626
14,429
113
45
Way up there
I go back and forth on whether or not Avery is guilty but the bottom line is, the investigation was tainted so they have no case against him right now, every piece of evidence found during the 8 day seizure of his property should be thrown out. The most damning thing for the Manitowoc police is that even if he did kill this woman, their presence alone should be enough for a mistrial, why would they be there illegally if not to manipulate the case? That's the thing they can't explain, the thing they have been allowed to lie (under oath) about.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,682
80,072
113
DSM
not only is it poor logic, but I'm pretty sure it goes against the very jury instructions that I'm sure they were given before they went into the room.

As dumbfounding as the shoddy police work was, what happened with the jury is the most mind-boggling thing about this case.

Except it becomes a lot more clear after watching the series what the people are like up there. Very Dur-dur-dur up there. The "smart ones" up there are what we Iowans would call "drive-thrus" or "people that don't go to the movies to watch the films", yeah? Yeah.
 
Last edited:

Tailg8er

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2011
7,893
4,743
113
38
Johnston
I saw this on FB the other day, wasn't sure if it'd been posted here yet

[video=youtube;yRguRPcGMQA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRguRPcGMQA[/video]


Every damn phone conversation it seemed like lol. Yeah... yeah..
 

CYCLNST8

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2008
11,370
13,523
113
Urbandale
www.gimikk.com
I understand the documentary was one-sided, but if you were to watch just the court proceedings, I don't know how you can't come away with reasonable doubt. The investigation was an absolute mess. The prosecution's theory on the series of events was an absolute mess. The interrogation of Brenden was a ******* joke. The lack of questioning other suspects is a ******* joke.

I seriously lost sleep after watching the show wondering if someone was going to frame me for something.
 

Skidoosh

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2012
2,699
769
113
I wonder if he would even be convicted if they didn't get the Dassey "confession". If they jury truly did make their decision because thy "feared for their safety", it was probably because they heard that Avery raped, mutilated, and burned the victim - which would not have even come up outside of Dassey.

Beyond that, I feel the worst for the parents. They seem like honest, hard-working folk who just got their family absolutely shredded in every way.
 

Colorado

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2008
2,472
1,316
113
Colorado
The DA and sheriff going on TV to outline what they concocted from a coerced confession before the trial started was the beginning of the end. Good luck with an impartial jury unless the jurors were from at least two states away.
 

ThatllDoCy

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2009
17,991
11,144
113
53
Minneapolis, MN
www.katchllc.com
The DA and sheriff going on TV to outline what they concocted from a coerced confession before the trial started was the beginning of the end. Good luck with an impartial jury unless the jurors were from at least two states away.

That was grandstanding at its finest. That really bothered me, and the guise of impartiality that they presented to the public by not allowing the Manitowoc Sheriff's office to participate was nothing more than theater.
 

Dannynoonan

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 5, 2015
899
944
93
54
Alright is anyone not thinking the brother and the ex? there was one TV interview that they did that was really really sketchy.

And the fact that it only took 25 minutes to find the RAV 4 is waaay too coincidental, the lot was 40 acres, it would take days do find that if it was already there, and the way it was "covered" up was really terrible, wouldn't they crush it and just get rid of it all together?

Just a lot of weird things that were to supposed to happen, didn't. Like no evidence of theresa ever being in the trailer, much like brendan, no evidence of him.

At the end of the trial, the prosecution even said there is one man, and one man only that did this... Wouldn't that make the defense that much easier? Blows my mind that both of them are in jail.
hh

Mike (brother), Scott roommate, and Eric (ex) will all be found out to have, at the least, tampered with the vehicle and lying to police. They deleted TH voicemails from her phone.
Also, Colburn and Lenk called the trio...this will all come out soon. Mistrial!!
 

Dannynoonan

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 5, 2015
899
944
93
54
Kratz should be disbarred for that stunt and allowing Brendan to be interrogated without his lawyer present. Brendan's ******* lawyer should be disbarred for allowing it as well as treating Brendan as he did. He had no desire to defend Brendan. Sickening.
 

Dannynoonan

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 5, 2015
899
944
93
54
not only is it poor logic, but I'm pretty sure it goes against the very jury instructions that I'm sure they were given before they went into the room.

As dumbfounding as the shoddy police work was, what happened with the jury is the most mind-boggling thing about this case.

The excused juror,#11, was excused because his daughter had an accident. He was on record 10 yrs ago that he was going to vote not guilty and not going to change like others did. Remember that one juror was the father of a deputy and another was a family ember of the clerk of court! This accident was set up to get him excused. Fear was now instilled in the jury.