OT: The Witch

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,202
25,072
113
Minneapolis
Some critics that I follow have said that it is not a horror movie. It is a really good movie with some creepy parts. But they have said that if you go in expecting horror, you will be disappointed.

Yeah it's not a typical horror movie at all. All about mood and pace and tension and build up. Last 15 minutes are supposedly the reward to the build up.
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,202
25,072
113
Minneapolis
A bunch of reviews hit Metacritic today. A horror movie averaging 83/100 is very rare, and there are many perfect 100/100 reviews.
 

cyrocksmypants

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2008
91,284
89,027
113
Washington DC
Some critics that I follow have said that it is not a horror movie. It is a really good movie with some creepy parts. But they have said that if you go in expecting horror, you will be disappointed.

This makes a lot of sense. Seems like a film worth checking out.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,264
36,044
113
Honestly the film kind of has a crucible vibe IMO. Wonder if it will have a religious persecution angle.
 

Dannynoonan

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 5, 2015
899
944
93
54

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,202
25,072
113
Minneapolis
Ok. I'm not sure how I'd even categorize this movie. Technically a horror movie but like none I've personally ever seen before. It doesn't rely on a bunch of blood or jumps though there are a handful of those. The pacing is slow and meticulous which builds this sense of doom and dread as the movie unravels. I ended up feeling...genuinely disturbed almost like I just saw something raw and too real. Did I like it? It's an excellently made movie. From the cinematography to the score it is all great. That being said this ain't a movie that I think the masses will love. It's a slow burn and makes you earn the terror and fear. People are gonna see 'horror' and 'scary as hell' etc from critics and think it's gonna be something they've seen. It's not that.

I thought it was great. Original. Disturbing as eff. I'd definitely recommend it full aware that some people are gonna hate it and be bored by a lot of it. Such is the way with a lot of horror movies.
 
Last edited:

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,202
25,072
113
Minneapolis
most disturbing may be that it's loosely based on a handful of documented instances from the Puritan era.
 
Last edited:

cyrocksmypants

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2008
91,284
89,027
113
Washington DC
Ok. I'm not sure how I'd even categorize this movie. Technically a horror movie but like none I've personally ever seen before. It doesn't rely on a bunch of blood or jumps though there are a handful of those. The pacing is slow and meticulous which builds this sense of doom and dread as the movie unravels. I ended up feeling...genuinely disturbed almost like I just saw something raw and too real. Did I like it? It's an excellently made movie. From the cinematography to the score it is all great. That being said this ain't a movie that I think the masses will love. It's a slow burn and makes you earn the terror and fear. People are gonna see 'horror' and 'scary as hell' etc from critics and think it's gonna be something they've seen. It's not that.

I thought it was great. Original. Disturbing as eff. I'd definitely recommend it full aware that some people are gonna hate it and be bored by a lot of it. Such is the way with a lot of horror movies.

I know you said its original, but if you were to compare the style, what's a film you'd compare it to.

You've actually really got me interested with the slow development and feeling of doom.
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,202
25,072
113
Minneapolis
I'm gonna have to sleep on that question about comparing it to something else.

Final thought for the night: something happens in the first fifteen or so minutes that tells you what this filmmaker is capable of doing. Remember that. That hooked me and though it was a slow and deliberate pace for a great deal after that instance you knew things were gonna get pretty disturbing by the end.
 

RyCy04

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2007
2,697
642
113
Omaha, NE
I would say it is a mix of The Crucible and The Shining. Crucible because of the era, setting, and witches. Shining because of the isolated family and sense of dread.
 
Last edited:

Cyclones_R_GR8

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 10, 2007
23,990
25,973
113
Omaha
Just saw it. I don't mind a slow burn but felt it ended just as it was finally getting somewhere.

When it ended the very first thought in my head was "wtf did I just watch?"

I will say it was very well made. Great music, genuinely eerie stuff. I would have changed how it ended.
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,202
25,072
113
Minneapolis
Just saw it. I don't mind a slow burn but felt it ended just as it was finally getting somewhere.

When it ended the very first thought in my head was "wtf did I just watch?"

I will say it was very well made. Great music, genuinely eerie stuff. I would have changed how it ended.

I know one thing. I will never own a black goat!
 

BBHMagic

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2009
4,370
1,379
113
Ok. I'm not sure how I'd even categorize this movie. Technically a horror movie but like none I've personally ever seen before. It doesn't rely on a bunch of blood or jumps though there are a handful of those. The pacing is slow and meticulous which builds this sense of doom and dread as the movie unravels. I ended up feeling...genuinely disturbed almost like I just saw something raw and too real. Did I like it? It's an excellently made movie. From the cinematography to the score it is all great. That being said this ain't a movie that I think the masses will love. It's a slow burn and makes you earn the terror and fear. People are gonna see 'horror' and 'scary as hell' etc from critics and think it's gonna be something they've seen. It's not that.

I thought it was great. Original. Disturbing as eff. I'd definitely recommend it full aware that some people are gonna hate it and be bored by a lot of it. Such is the way with a lot of horror movies.

I agree with everything you said. One thing I was impressed with was how real it felt; right down to how they talked. Sometimes it was hard to understand their conversations due to heavy accents and just the way they talked back then (thee, thou, dost). It added to the realism though, which made the sense of dread more real.
 

CRAZYGREG

Well-Known Member
Feb 29, 2008
3,276
297
83
Des Moines
Just got back from this movie. I only went to see it based on this thread. I want to know who is going to be sending me my money back? Someone also owes me two hours of my life back!
 

Shawker

This May Not Be Accurate
Jun 19, 2014
3,130
4,951
113
39
Des Moines
I definitely want to see this, but I'm going to be disappointed if this is like It Follows. That was such a letdown for me.
 

JohnnyFive

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2012
5,159
2,522
113
I definitely want to see this, but I'm going to be disappointed if this is like It Follows. That was such a letdown for me.

I thought It Follows was better than I expected it to be and kind of a throwback to when horror movies were legitimately creepy and didn't rely so much on jump scares to get a rise out of its audience. Or maybe it was the creepy 80s synthesizer music that made me nostalgic.
 

JohnnyFive

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2012
5,159
2,522
113
I agree with everything you said. One thing I was impressed with was how real it felt; right down to how they talked. Sometimes it was hard to understand their conversations due to heavy accents and just the way they talked back then (thee, thou, dost). It added to the realism though, which made the sense of dread more real.

The Puritan English threw me off a few times too.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron