Predictions / What do you need to see against OU?

Final Score vs OU

  • OU by 20+

    Votes: 44 14.7%
  • OU by 10-19

    Votes: 136 45.5%
  • OU by 1-9

    Votes: 82 27.4%
  • ISU by 1-9

    Votes: 28 9.4%
  • ISU by 10-19

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • ISU by 20+

    Votes: 2 0.7%
  • Meteor Strike

    Votes: 6 2.0%

  • Total voters
    299

deadeyededric

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
15,836
13,623
113
Parts Unknown
A 10-point loss would be a moral victory to me. I think we lose by 4tds. The defense plays well but gets worn out because they are on the field the whole game.
 

stewart092284

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2021
2,452
2,300
113
40
You've nailed it on my confliction. I HATE that we're at the point where moral victories are good enough, but we are. To me, that means we look competitive in each phase of the game and keep it close through 3 quarters. Yes, that's nothing more than a moral victory, but I don't know that I can realistically hope for more than that based on what we've seen thus far. If we do those things and show development, I'll be pleased enough. But we need to continue to see growth and development each game. OSU had maybe the worst defense we'll play all year and still couldn't run the damn ball. Growth and development includes coaching staffs that are willing to adapt in-game.
I understand and can't disagree with you - but in year 7, I just can't get my head on board being happy with any kind of moral victory. Yes, we don't have a ton of experience. But allegedly we're a good development program which means being competitive IMO should be the baseline. Do I expect to beat the Oklahoma's of the world on the regular?

Nope. Maybe 1 out of 4 or 2 outta 5. Something like that.

But while I recognize your logic and realize what you are saying, I just can't be happy with that this late into a regime. If we had lost 20 players to gambling, or had a massive staff exodus like a whole new offensive staff, it'd be a little different. But we went in for a grease and oil change, not a complete body overhaul in the off-season.

I think we ran the ball reasonably well - key word reasonably - once we decided to spread them out, established the passing game and didn't try running into 8-9 man boxes, which even CMC talked about the number of hats in the box.

We're not going to turn into the Eagles or the 2022 Carolina Panthers but it showed a little sign of life.


Essentially, we're just opposite side of the coin. Where some might take being competitive for 3 quarters with Oklahoma as a moral victory, I see it as not being sure when - or ever - we're going to close to a point where we think we have a real chance of winning instead of just being competitive. That's why in year 7 its frustrating to be looking for moral victories. Coming off of missing a bowl and a 6 loss season the year before, all momentum is at dangerous risk of stalling within the program IMO.

I fully expect us to be 2-3 by tomorrow night. I just can't see that as a good thing or come out of that feeling OK. Hopefully there are positives in terms of growth and development - I'm just gonna be depressed overall knowing with each "moral" victory - the chances of another bowl season spent home increases
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jer

2122

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2021
1,447
1,851
113
63
If I put $100 on 20 point dog 'clones to win tomorrow, what would it pay?
 

CycloneSpinning

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2022
1,055
1,354
113
44
In fairness, who have we really played to say that we are any good? Iowa just got shutout and OSU only scored 7 points against South Alabama. Not to mention that same OSU offense put 27 points and over 400 yards of offense on our defense. In terms of OU's schedule, they have played SMU, who is located in a recruiting hotbed and has talent at the skill positions, particularly at receiver and quarterback. They are similar to a UCF in terms of being in a recruiting hotbed and landing under-the-radar athletes. Then they played Cincinnati, who has a former power-five quarterback that played in Dan Mullen's high-powered Florida offenses, on the road and held them to two field goals. Cincinnati also went on the road and beat Pitt, a power five team. In other words, it's not like OU played The Citadel four-straight games. I think objectively speaking, OU has played a tougher schedule than us and has been tested more than we have up to this point.
Oh I’m not saying we’re better…or that their schedule has been easier than ours. I actually didn’t even consider that. I only am not yet convinced they have a top 5 defense. They may…but they haven’t played anyone good enough to warrant that kind of talk yet.
 

cyclone1209

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2010
3,860
2,531
113
Denver
I would say that we lose by at least three touchdowns. I would love to be wrong….
I'm still not fully convinced this version of OU is on par with the Lincoln Riley OU teams..

Campbell historically does really well in this game.

I want to see our pass rush develop something, we have not had sacks since the UNI game. If three don't get there, blitz more people, this is big boy football. Cannot let a QB sit back there for 6 seconds.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BigCyFan

joefrog

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2008
8,207
2,543
113
Clive, Iowa
Honestly, I want a Kempt repeat.

I want CMC to go for the win.

Go routes on the first play, and have Rocco heave it.

Play to win.

Predictable (CampbellBall) ISU has no chance winning this game.

Chaotic (joefrog) ISU has a slim chance of winning this game.

I'll always take slim over none.

Be bold Matt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: werdnamanhill

z001

New Member
Sep 27, 2023
15
5
3
Oh I’m not saying we’re better…or that their schedule has been easier than ours. I actually didn’t even consider that. I only am not yet convinced they have a top 5 defense. They may…but they haven’t played anyone good enough to warrant that kind of talk yet.
I think it will be a really good test for a young team, win or lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone

gocy444

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 15, 2008
2,832
6,077
113
Ames, IA
OU 24-14. We give up a non defensive TD. Think Rocco has a solid game, but we are under 50 yards rushing.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron