Has to be remembered that these early rankings are all based on early context. They can’t make assumptions about who is good and who isn’t yet.If ISU is not worthy of being ranked then iowa should be nowhere near the top 10.
Probably a Top 10 team, not Top 5, but they deserve their ranking for now, they have the most impressive resume in college football the first 2 weeks.Iowa 5th ahead of Clemson that’s complete bull …. They aren’t a 5th rated team
Probably a Top 10 team, not Top 5, but they deserve their ranking for now, they have the most impressive resume in college football the first 2 weeks.
I wouldn’t get my hopes up on Florida dropping.
Probably a Top 10 team, not Top 5, but they deserve their ranking for now, they have the most impressive resume in college football the first 2 weeks.
I wouldn’t get my hopes up on Florida dropping.
Hate the hoks but have you watched Clemson this year..?Just as bad offensively as Iowa. Barely beat a bad Georgia Tech team last night.Iowa 5th ahead of Clemson that’s complete bull …. They aren’t a 5th rated team
Florida won't drop I don't think they will punish them for almost taking bama to OTMy guess is we should be 12 after yesterday. Florida and UCLA lost in front of us, so I think notre dame moves to 11 and us right behind them and Florida right behind us.
Coaches poll has ole miss jumping us….
AP does the same. Ole Miss up four spots to #13.
The AP (and Coaches) Polls mean whatever the voters think it means. The analytics based rankings are supposed to estimate relative strength.The problem is this: The AP poll is supposed to be a ranking of playing strength, not a ranking of accomplishment.
If Team A beats three ranked teams and Team B beats the bottom three, but Team B is the stronger team, then Team B is supposed to be ranked ahead of Team A despite Team A's clearly stronger resume. In other words, the AP poll is supposed to predict the future, not judge the past. Accomplishments provide evidence that inform this judgment, but they aren't the whole story. So I am very hesitant to use the language of "deserve their ranking for now." Either they are correctly ranked now or they aren't. Nevertheless, I know what you mean: Given all the unknowns at this point, their accomplishments probably outweigh the other factors that go into estimating playing strength.
Doesn’t make much sense at all.