A couple comments:
- A shot blocker doesn't just block shots of the opposing team's 5. The analytics mantra pushes the efficiency of 3 point shots and points at the basket. So a guy like Ward has a huge value in defending shots at the basket. Just think back at this past season and the number of shots ISU players missed at the basket. Shot blockers impact more than just shots they block.
- IMO there is a trend among elite teams of having a traditional post offensive threat. What better way of freeing up 3 point shooters than forcing defenses to double down on a low post offensive threat.
Ward might not fit the role of low post offensive threat, but his athleticism would fit in well if we decide to run more this season and in running the PNR.
1.) We do need shot blocking, he's not saying that. He's implying a singular shot-blocker isn't what it used to be in this regard. Cato used to be able to live in the paint.
2.) Ward isn't handling a traditional post offensive threat without a double. Stockard did a lot of that for VCU. He's more a 4 that has limited offense, so he plays 5.
I really like his defense, but more for guarding ball-screens, the numerous two-4 lineups we see, and for help defense (challenging at the rim the opposing guards and wings). On offense, Conditt and Jones were not really finishers either, so he could help there. I doubt he can distribute at the high post like Conditt, but I think that could be a good thing, if it means we change the offense