It wasn’t horrible. My only thing is when you allow hand to hand combat down low then call hand checks 30 feet from the hoop. But overall it was pretty consistent.
That’s the way they called it when I was in HS. Feel free to bounce a posts head off the lane but don’t you dare hand check the point.It wasn’t horrible. My only thing is when you allow hand to hand combat down low then call hand checks 30 feet from the hoop. But overall it was pretty consistent.
Even the announcers were commenting on it.No one is saying we were robbed or whatever...some (myself included) thought the refs were letting it get way too physical on BOTH sides and missing or deciding not to call obvious fouls (Heise's dunk attempt for one). Then it has evolved into a discussion of what type of officiating benefits/hurts ISU. That is all...
Yeah but that’s never been the case for college basketball officiating.Raise the standard. They should be consistently good. It’s their job. Jobs are hard. People are still consistently good at hard jobs every day.
I thought Jackson getting hacked by two guys at the basketball looked pretty egregious19 Final Fours between those three guys last night.
They're going to let you play. Absolutely nothing egregious.
TL;DR: Welcome to league play in the Big 12.
My preference for ISU and as a fan is:let them play is good
Other than I am fine if calls go against Kansas because it’s time for the opposition to Kansas to get calls or calls go against Iowa because who doesn’t like to see a Mad Fran meltdown.As long as they call the game consistently, I'm fine with the officiating. Teams can adjust to the officiating so long as the calls are consistent