CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Huh. I don't look at 2022 as long into the future, but that's cool, I guess.
because the people that are ranting are doing so because the situation is not unfolding in a way they like and they want to change it.Curious why silence from Jamie Pollard a good thing. I understand ranting on twitter is not professional.
Pollard meamwhile...This is good (for us). When JP or Wintersteen starts jacking jaw on social media then I’ll know we’re officially ******.
Circulating around as a B16 model. Placates WVU. Strong Texas presence. No issues with BYU in this group.
![]()
The less he says right know the greater his options IMO. Only if they think they need to send a message to someone will they release things that way, which seems unlikely, especially given the scramble ISU has in front of it. The biggest challenge has to be that there is no established end game or set of rules here that the schools, or even the conferences are sure of. Well, perhaps the SEC has a plan but I'd bet everyone else if guessing at it a bit.because the people that are ranting are doing so because the situation is not unfolding in a way they like and they want to change it.
Nebraska took a reduced share for 7 years, Rutgers and Maryland I believe still are taking a reduced share. I am pretty sure anyone will though.Exactly. That's what people need to grasp. There's a lot of real estate between what we'd get from a zombie B12 and a full-fledged Big 10 member. If ISU gets in the Big 10 it's likely forgoing plenty of media share for a while.
You're missing the part where Ohio state would act like texas and threaten to leave if they don't get extra cash. It's voting for that under duress. You think the big 12 schools took that on willingly? Luckily for you guys, you don't have to deal with those clowns..although I'm sure osu does throw its weight around a bit.I'm going to go ahead and bet that the B10 isn't going to change the model that's led to it's long term stability while nearly every other conference (outside the SEC) has had defections or threats of defections. Adopting the revenue model that collapsed the B12 seems like a pretty foolish decision and there's no scenario where any B10 schools would vote for it.
A more likely outcome would be tOSU leaving the B10 if they felt they could either A.) Make significantly more money elsewhere. or B.) No longer compete for national championships in the B10. In order to avoid that playing out, the B10 needs to make a move to create a better football conference, that's why I think you're going to see the B10 join up with the top of the P12.
The boost doesn't really come from a "per team added" basis, that's just functionally how it's measured. The boost will come because there is no longer a B12 or P12 conference to bid on, so you've consolidated premium inventory and reduced competition, increasing the bid for the B10 inventory. Would a merged B12/P12 get a bid? Absolutely, but if you remove Texas/OU/USC/Oregon/Etc. the bid might be $12M per school instead of $35M per school - the difference would get bid towards the B10 contract.
Circulating around as a B16 model. Placates WVU. Strong Texas presence. No issues with BYU in this group.
![]()
Circulating around as a B16 model. Placates WVU. Strong Texas presence. No issues with BYU in this group.
![]()
Circulating around as a B16 model. Placates WVU. Strong Texas presence. No issues with BYU in this group.
![]()
Curious why silence from Jamie Pollard a good thing. I understand ranting on twitter is not professional.
Curious why silence from Jamie Pollard a good thing. I understand ranting on twitter is not professional.
Iirc he's usually quiet when things are OK or he's got stuff figured out.
Or maybe he's just on vacation and knows nothing.