I never noticed the statue until it was pointed in an article I read this morning. Even after that, it took me a while to notice it.
That would be the biggest middle finger ever to George Lucas. I am doubtful they will remake them but as another poster said, they are just going to act like the prequels never even happened and build new storylines.
Since you seem fixated on turning everything back to how much you think the Force Awakens sucked, I have the perfect thread for you:http://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/thr...i-thread-spoilers.212233/page-43#post-5198105And the "soft remake" that was VII wasn't somehow that same middle finger?
The prequels novel story lines and new settings... something The Force Awakens lacked...
Plus the competence and craft behind The Force Awakens... something the prequels lacked...
= actually has considerable potential... they're both deeply flawed but in opposite ways
Much better than them trying to remake A New Hope and Empire in everything but name.
I get it, people - the prequels sucked - but we seem to misunderstand the reasons why.
Don't fix the wrong problem - the iso sets with Georges last year weren't the problem.![]()
The prequels novel story lines and new settings...
Jango Fett was his attempt to correct the wrong of taking a very promising character (Boba Fett) and throwing him away before you really gave him an opportunity to do much of anything interesting.George has an entire galaxy to work with; puts Tatooine in all but one of his movies.
And Jango Fett. Novel idea.
I pretend the prequals don't exist. Apparently they are pretending the prequels didn't happen either if Jyn's father is responsible for the construction of the Death Star when the prequels told us those stupid bug aliens were the ones responsible for it. I'm sure they will have an explanation for it since those movies are canon, but I would be perfectly happy if they just said **** it and retconned it.
Jango Fett was his attempt to correct the wrong of taking a very promising character (Boba Fett) and throwing him away before you really gave him an opportunity to do much of anything interesting.
Since you seem fixated on turning everything back to how much you think the Force Awakens sucked, I have the perfect thread for you:http://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/thr...i-thread-spoilers.212233/page-43#post-5198105
Why don't you try trolling in that thread for a while and see if anyone takes the bait.
scene: over bottomless pit at the heart of Cloud City
"But The Force Awakens was good!"
"Search your feelings. You know it to be true."
"But... *sniffles* NOOOOOOOOOO!!! NOOOOO!!!!!!!!!"
: jimlad :
I just think you should remake bad movies that had conceptual potential. If there's a time where it is appropriate, that is it. Episodes I, II, and III definitely fall into that category.
Super cut of the trailers.
Maybe you know this all ready, but Timothy Zahn is writing a book called Thrawn to retcon the character and bring him in to current canon. I guess they are all ready doing that by including him in Rebels too.I've been listening to audio books of the Timothy Zahn Heir to the Empire trilogy on my drive, which I think is probably the best high quality story we have already that ties directly into the original trilogy without any huge time gap (5 years later).
Just listening to that with the visuals of the Rogue One trailers has me pretty amped that this could be even better than TFA. Even though Rogue One will be more connected to the original trilogy in some ways, it's almost impossible for it to plot recycle like many accuse TFA of.
Maybe you know this all ready, but Timothy Zahn is writing a book called Thrawn to retcon the character and bring him in to current canon. I guess they are all ready doing that by including him in Rebels too.